I want to thank VI REDD for this thought bubble.

I understand that in the face of what seems to be the worst economic time in america in my life-time, be i'm only 23, that there seems to be no clear choice in what candidate to choose for, this is generally the reaction I get from most people my age who pay mind to political matters. I have a set of core values that swings my favor one way to a certain cock shaped man, McCain, instead of a certain man who resembles an ape, obama. but either way I feel like I am going to lose, much of this dispair comes from our congress that is giving out money in order to avoid the american public knocking on their doors with pitchforks, and a few judges who have decided that they make the laws instead of interpret them. so it is better to lose by a short mile than a long one, who do you think could lead this country best and what is the thing that sways your favor the strongest?

__________________
insert witty comment here

hi............bye....................I'm HIGH

Are you rich? Can't think of too many other folks who have a lot of reason to vote for McCain. Republicans are good for the rich folks, Democrats are good for the poor folks and the middle-class folks. Since I've never been rich, I've always voted Democrat, since it doesn't make any sense to me to vote for people who like to take away the little money I do have and give it to the folks who already have more money than they can spend in ten lifetimes.

If you're rich, then McCain is the *obvious* choice. Otherwise, a vote for McCain is a vote against your own interests. I mean, McCain wants to make those tax cuts for the rich *permanent*, at a time when our economy is in shambles. Does that make any sense at all? Warren Buffet, one of the richest people on the planet, called those tax cuts "welfare for the rich" and questioned why *he*, of all people, was getting such enormous tax cuts. A McCain presidency, right after this horrid Bush presidency, will destroy our middle class, and if that happens, this country's done, put a fork in it.

Vote third party it may be a waste of a vote now but in times to come possibly on day America may have more than two choice's as a president

__________________
Preacherman, don't tell me, Heaven is under the earth. I know you don't know What life is really worth.

Here's the question......don't vote and let O"bama win, or vote for McCain, and let the moderates ((O'bama)) win. (You get it) If McCain wins, he will be better for the country short term, but bolster and solidify our habit, our leftist habit, at the same time. If O'Bama wins, we veer violently left, at the detriment to all BUT the rich, (who will wait/pray for another Reaganesque figure to fill the void), and hopefully (maybe this is what he's talking about) find our way back to liberty via suffering. Either way we're moving left.....

Third party voting falls into the "don't vote" category, in my opinion......unless it is a true leader, and a patriot, carrying the nomination.

You think Obama looks like an ape? And McCain resembles a penis?

__________________
SeeMoreBuds
HOW TO GROW MARIJUANA - 15LBS IN 80 DAYS
www.SeeMoreBuds.com

i suppose that's one way of looking at it. a short sighted way, but a way nonetheless. short sightedness seems to be the hallmark of the liberal agenda these days and a lot of folks are eating it up. they seem to have forgotten the old saw about giving a man a fish as opposed to teaching him to fish and their message is resonating with those trapped in the growing cult of entitlement. a more proper definition would probably be that conservatives are good for folks who want to be rich and liberals are good for folks who wish us all to be poor. since we have no true conservative contender for the oval office, i suppose it would be most prudent to back the candidate that is the most conservative of the two.

lately i have been looking back over our past presidents and have found that we have never really had a president that truly held to conservative values, at least not within my lifetime. each occupant of the white house has managed to extend the grasp of government a little more into our lives and, with the help of congress, increase the people's dependence on the great american bureaucracy. has there ever been a president who actually advocated any substantial shrinking of government?

the people are now being given a choice between two socialist candidates. one who offers the illusion of comfort in return for your freedoms and the other who offers the illusion of safety for some others of your freedoms. most will make decisions based on a few individual issues - health care, iraq, the economy etc. some will merely be voting a strict party ticket. a very few will be looking beyond the campaign promises and partisan posing. they will be searching for a leader that can see beyond what is best for their party and their own political future, to where their decisions will leave this country in the future. they'll be looking for him, but they won't find him in this short list of losers.

it seems y'all are going to be forced, once again, to chose between the lesser of two evils. you are going to have to decide how much of our freedom you are willing to give up. at this point i have little faith in the american people to look beyond their own comfort and i have little doubt that you will choose to sacrifice america's ability to succeed for the illusions of the nanny state.

__________________
When her work is done, she forgets it. That is why it lasts forever.
If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading.

"I'd rather crawl to the guilliotine than walk to it......" me

please post the video

thank you

__________________
SeeMoreBuds
HOW TO GROW MARIJUANA - 15LBS IN 80 DAYS
www.SeeMoreBuds.com

Of your mother.....I think you own the trademark for that one.....let me know if your willing to release.....