Coming to your town soon ... - Page 4

ZenMaster · #31 05-22-2008, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

Oh I've noticed Vi, and it is your republican assholes in congress and the president and his cronies that are responsible. It's just like you to try and shove this off on the democrats, good try, but no cigar. I'm surprised with all your money that you should be concerned at all. Whats 5-10 bucks a gallon to you, small change. Remember when Bush took office, Gas was 1.20 a gallon. He's trippled it ++!

I am curious on how you believe its the republican's fault. Your only reasoning is that Bush made his money from off shore oil refineries, but what has he done to make the gas prices high? You believe its his fault but I want to know exactly, on paper, what he has done to put us in the situation we are in, please.

medicineman · #32 05-22-2008, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenMaster

I am curious on how you believe its the republican's fault. Your only reasoning is that Bush made his money from off shore oil refineries, but what has he done to make the gas prices high? You believe its his fault but I want to know exactly, on paper, what he has done to put us in the situation we are in, please.

I'm not saying it was that Bush called up the oil companies and said, look, now that I'm in, go for it, But it wouldn't surprise me in the least. It is well documented that Bush and his cronies have had oil interests for years. If A+B=C, then this simple formula should make one want to look deeper into this whole white house shenanigans including the price of oil. I say there is a direct link, it just hasn't been exposed yet. Wait a while and youi'll know. I'm also not saying that Democrats aren't complicent in this, but since it was a repuke controlled everything untill '06' and a repuke senate that holds every bill to under the 60 votes needed to pass anything, I think this falls squarely on the shoulders of the republicans. 1.20 a gallon before Bush, 4.00 after, what say you? Believe me, it would take someone way better positioned than me to prove this theory, but being a simple man, it sounds pretty factual.

We TaRdED · #33 05-22-2008, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arabmobster

thats where ur wrong hydrogen technology would take at least a decade to become the main stream engine in cars

No, your wrong. They sell kits that you can but to retrofit your current car into an hydrogen-gas hybrid. You can run hydrogen into an internal combustion engine no problems. You do NOT need a fuel cell. The technology is here but being keep suppressed. The current production cars could use pretty much the same ICE technology except integrate the hydrogen hybrid design into the stock design of the vehicle. It would not take much more equipment or money. The technology is here.

Just a quick search.

YouTube - Water 4 Gas Reviews | Is Water 4 Gas A Scam?

YouTube - Run Your Car On Water Conversion Kit

YouTube - Create your own water car hybrid for under 50

YouTube - Run your car on water Goto water4gasoline.com

YouTube - Run Your Car On Water - The How To Guide

arabmobster · #34 05-22-2008, 09:55 AM

never cn that before i wanna get one of these kits

bush and his family have a couple oil fields in kuwait , and him and goones have money invested in alot of the companies doing supposed construction projects in iraq, thats where the conflict on interest comes in, is he working for the americans our working for his pockets

ZenMaster · #35 05-22-2008, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

I'm not saying it was that Bush called up the oil companies and said, look, now that I'm in, go for it, But it wouldn't surprise me in the least. It is well documented that Bush and his cronies have had oil interests for years. If A+B=C, then this simple formula should make one want to look deeper into this whole white house shenanigans including the price of oil. I say there is a direct link, it just hasn't been exposed yet. Wait a while and youi'll know. I'm also not saying that Democrats aren't complicent in this, but since it was a repuke controlled everything untill '06' and a repuke senate that holds every bill to under the 60 votes needed to pass anything, I think this falls squarely on the shoulders of the republicans. 1.20 a gallon before Bush, 4.00 after, what say you? Believe me, it would take someone way better positioned than me to prove this theory, but being a simple man, it sounds pretty factual.

Well I believe its a collaboration of reasons. You know the chinese are adding 5 million cars a year to their population? They are definitely a global market contender now. Also, the world is basically at maximum capacity for producing oil, meaning, we cannot produce more barrels a day than what we are doing. So that oil is at a set amount now and it is being fought for by the entire world. Its a clichè but its true, supply and demand.

From what I have seen, from what can be proven, from what is fact, it is the liberals hindering expansion of America's independency from foreign oil and energy. Don't get me wrong, I am vaguely suspicious as well since Bush is connected to oil, however there just isn't evidence, or reason for that matter, to link him or his cabinet to the current energy crisis.

We TaRdED · #36 05-22-2008, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenMaster

Don't get me wrong, I am vaguely suspicious as well since Bush is connected to oil, however there just isn't evidence, or reason for that matter, to link him or his cabinet to the current energy crisis.

In my opinion BUSH IS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT! FOCK HIM, WHO IS HE TO TAKE OUR LIBERTIES AWAY.

Guilty until proven innocent I say!!!

medicineman · #37 05-22-2008, 10:15 AM

Zen check the facts. It took 100 years for gas to hit 1.20 and 7 years to tripple+, Is it a coincidence that it was the seven years that Bush was president???

ZenMaster · #38 05-22-2008, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by We TaRdED

In my opinion BUSH IS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT! FOCK HIM, WHO IS HE TO TAKE OUR LIBERTIES AWAY.

Guilty until proven innocent I say!!!

Thats a very disappointing mentality, We. So what you basically said it is Bush's fault no matter what, despite there being no evidence. That is backwards mentality and honestly juvenile.

ZenMaster · #39 05-22-2008, 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

Zen check the facts. It took 100 years for gas to hit 1.20 and 7 years to tripple+, Is it a coincidence that it was the seven years that Bush was president???

I just listed why gas is this high. Over the last 7 years, China is much more mobile, the world has reached its maximum capacity, and liberals won't let us drill. Coincidence that Bush was in office during this time? Yes. It just so happened that China has caught up with the rest of the world, and believe me after Bush is gone, they will continue to put more cars in their streets.

medicineman · #40 05-22-2008, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenMaster

I just listed why gas is this high. Over the last 7 years, China is much more mobile, the world has reached its maximum capacity, and liberals won't let us drill. Coincidence that Bush was in office during this time? Yes. It just so happened that China has caught up with the rest of the world, and believe me after Bush is gone, they will continue to put more cars in their streets.

I guess if I were a Bush bandit like you, I'd be in denial also!