|
View Poll Results: How many of the members are for more or less privatization of governmental entities . | |
Complete privatization of all government entities
|    | 2 | 22.22% | |
Partial privatization of some governmental entities
|    | 1 | 11.11% | |
leave it alone
|    | 2 | 22.22% | |
More governmental control of some entities
|    | 4 | 44.44% | 
05-19-2008, 09:49 AM
|  | Super Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 7,833
| | Privatization | | How do you members feel about privatization of most government entities such as prisons and national parks etc.
__________________ Amendment IV, search and seizure rights. Read about them before they're gone.
Last edited by medicineman; 05-19-2008 at 09:54 AM.
| 
05-19-2008, 09:54 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: um.... where do you live?
Posts: 2,877
| | well, it sure would be alot easier for us to gurilla grow if it was all private land wouldn't it. or at the very least, less harsh penalties (depending on the state). right? or is there something I may not be thinking about. | 
05-19-2008, 09:56 AM
|  | Super Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 7,833
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ORECAL well, it sure would be alot easier for us to gurilla grow if it was all private land wouldn't it. or at the very least, less harsh penalties (depending on the state). right? or is there something I may not be thinking about. | So you think a private owner of a national park would be less inclined to remove your grow and arrest you?
__________________ Amendment IV, search and seizure rights. Read about them before they're gone. | 
05-19-2008, 10:36 AM
|  | Super Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Socialist Republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 7,198
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by medicineman So you think a private owner of a national park would be less inclined to remove your grow and arrest you? | The majority of the businesses government has its hands in could be run more efficiently by the private sector. And, no ... the owner of a private national park would call the government authorities immediately if a grow was discovered on the property. After all ... a private business person wouldn't want to offend the paying customers. Conversely, government offends the paying customers all the time and doesn't give it a second thought. Vi
__________________ Obama wins, we lose. McCain wins, we lose. | 
05-19-2008, 10:39 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: um.... where do you live?
Posts: 2,877
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by medicineman So you think a private owner of a national park would be less inclined to remove your grow and arrest you? | no, i think they would be less likely to spend the time and money searching. | 
05-19-2008, 10:43 AM
|  | Super Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 7,833
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ORECAL no, i think they would be less likely to spend the time and money searching. | Probably and the time and money to keep the parks pristine. With profit comes greed. That is just the natural state of mankind. There is never enough.
__________________ Amendment IV, search and seizure rights. Read about them before they're gone. | 
05-19-2008, 10:45 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: um.... where do you live?
Posts: 2,877
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by medicineman Probably and the time and money to keep the parks pristine. With profit comes greed. That is just the natural state of mankind. There is never enough. | exactly...... they would rather that money be in their pocket than having it taking green plants out of their green forest....... a private owner would realize the stupidity of spending money to take out grows. | 
05-19-2008, 10:47 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: On the planet Earth, just like you! :D
Posts: 2,940
| | There is a lot more incentive for a private company to get things done right and at a fair price because they have competition that would replace them if need be. This is just my opinion from what I have seen and heard about gov't run business.
Should everything be privatized? My answer is no, I DONT THINK THE FEDERAL RESERVE SHOULD BE A PRIVATELY OWNED COMPANY!!! Lets print our own money.  | 
05-19-2008, 11:05 AM
|  | Super Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Socialist Republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 7,198
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by medicineman Probably and the time and money to keep the parks pristine. With profit comes greed. That is just the natural state of mankind. There is never enough. | Right, Med. And the last time I went to Disneyland, there were Marijuana plants growing on the hillsides, in every nook and cranny, and trash heaps were everywhere. LMAO @ your complete lack of a sense of customer service. Sorry, Buddy ... but when you make ludicrous statements like the one above, I just HAVE to counter it. Now, don't take it as a personal attack. Vi </IMG>
__________________ Obama wins, we lose. McCain wins, we lose.
Last edited by ViRedd; 05-19-2008 at 11:08 AM.
| 
05-19-2008, 11:08 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: um.... where do you live?
Posts: 2,877
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ViRedd Right, Med. And the last time I went to Disneyland, there were Marijuana plants growing on the hillsides, in every nook and cranny, and trash heaps were everywhere. LMAO @ your lack of a sense of customer service.
Vi | yeah, but just because there aren't plants growing everywhere, doesn't mean that they are customer service minded......I'm just saying.......
most customer service sucks ass at places that are government run. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | Come Check out a new Poker Forum for the online poker community
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM. |