A US Teenager Who Grew Up In Denver Was Executed WITHOUT TRIAL With a DRONE

Originally Posted by Dr Kynes

ohh deprave is not a "Democrat [tm]", any more than i am a "Republican [tm]"

i support a republic, he does not support democracy, not even the mob rule of "true democracy".

he espouses the surging mindless barbarian hordes of anarchy, but just a little.

not a lot, just a tiny bit of complete lawless fallout 3 type, mad max style anarchy.

only a wee bit of the complete breakdown of all society.

just a few drops of potassium cyanide in our soup.

not too much.

just enough.

no really. he's an expert.

he has very steady hands.

you can trust him.

what? why you giving me that look?

really, he knows what he is doing.

he said so.

several times.

really.

seriously, just a drop or two wont hurt you....

pretty much....not quite a 'well said' but...yea..I am such an 'extreme' libertarian really its bordering on anarchy. I am in between market anarchist and mutalist. That is a pretty wide gap I know but I bounce back and forth between that depending on the issues presented. Market Anarchy I see it as a utopian dream because its impossible to get there, there is no means for us to transform into that without some major breakdown, no viable path. So that is why I am basically say I am left leaning libertarian because it is the most realistic and the middle of those two ideologies which is were I do stand.

I don't believe that we can all share and be like "fuzzy bunnies" and that the world is full of goody gum drops. I am sorry its just not that simplistic. The fact of the matter is that much of the evil in this world is the states and its not from people. Like flys to shit evil people are attracted to the monopoly on power which has no accountability for its actions (the state) so this is why the state can never be good and wholesome because people with ethics don't join up with the mafia. I simply don't believe that the state actually protects people, this to me is a false, they do not have some kind of special powers or something and can not protect us better than we can protect ourselves.

Originally Posted by deprave

pretty much....not quite a 'well said' but...yea..I am such an 'extreme' libertarian really its bordering on anarchy. I am in between market anarchist and mutalist. That is a pretty wide gap I know but I bounce back and forth between that depending on the issues presented. Market Anarchy I see it as a utopian dream because its impossible to get there, there is no means for us to transform into that without some major breakdown, no viable path. So that is why I am basically a left leaning libertarian because it is the most realistic.

there is no market anarchy. there can never be such a thing. a market is a mutual agreement on the value of each person's goods.

anarchy results in the unilateral taking of all property by the guy with the biggest war band, or the fastest spear arm.

markets preclude anarchy. anarchy precludes markets. the two cannot co-exist.

this seems so obbvious that i am unable to comprehend your repeated insistence that anarchy is somehow filled with subtle shadings and gradations.

if a nation borders on an anarchistic stateless territory, then that nation must secure it's borders or also fall into anarchy. anarchy breeds raiders, rampaging hordes led by dominant strongmen, and barbarian armies with plunder on their minds.

anarchy invariably results in the rise of a strongman dictatorship, a feudal state or devolution into barbarism and a new dark age.

for more details, see All Of Recorded History.

Originally Posted by Dr Kynes

there is no market anarchy. there can never be such a thing. a market is a mutual agreement on the value of each person's goods.

anarchy results in the unilateral taking of all property by the guy with the biggest war band, or the fastest spear arm.

markets preclude anarchy. anarchy precludes markets. the two cannot co-exist.

this seems so obbvious that i am unable to comprehend your repeated insistence that anarchy is somehow filled with subtle shadings and gradations.

if a nation borders on an anarchistic stateless territory, then that nation must secure it's borders or also fall into anarchy. anarchy breeds raiders, rampaging hordes led by dominant strongmen, and barbarian armies with plunder on their minds.

anarchy invariably results in the rise of a strongman dictatorship, a feudal state or devolution into barbarism and a new dark age.

for more details, see All Of Recorded History.

See from post your responding to:

Originally Posted by deprave

Market Anarchy I see it as a utopian dream because its impossible to get there, there is no means for us to transform into that without some major breakdown, no viable path.

It is simply a belief in free markets and a stateless society..your right impossible to get there...but it does exist in philosophy.

And it is

DING DING DING


A Right leaning anarchist philosophy!

Originally Posted by deprave

So that is why I am basically say I am left leaning libertarian because it is the most realistic and the middle of those two ideologies which is were I do stand.

Last week you said you hated conservatives. The next day you said you were part conservative. Which is it?

Originally Posted by Dr Kynes

i am a libertarian, and as a libertarian i vehemently oppose all who would curtail my fredoms or attempt to destroy our constitution. alawaki junior was one of those. born in america, but dedicated and declared to be a member of of a foreign group with the destruction of the USA as their prime objective. al quaeda declared war on the us. going to join al quaeda is treason. treason is punishable by death in the courts, and on the battle feild.

get over it. he sacrificed himself when he teamed up with al quaeda. he just didnt get a chance to wear his fashionable hugo boss bomb vest.

I'd say if you are a "libertarian" you might consider refamiliarizing yourself with the tenets of the non-initiation of aggression principle.

Deprave have you ever thought of starting your own political movement?

you can call it the Malcontent Party

Originally Posted by kelly4

Last week you said you hated conservatives. The next day you said you were part conservative. Which is it?

part conservative where did I say that?

Hate is a pretty strong word.....but...Strongly disagree with them on atleast half of what they say is probably the fair way to put it, but I am sympathetic and understanding. I do feel bad for them. There have been times in my life were I thought I was a conservative I will admit.

Originally Posted by ChesusRice

Deprave have you ever thought of starting your own political movement?

you can call it the Malcontent Party

Motto:"Right leaning Lefties for Anarchy"