January to June 2012 warmest first half of any year on record

Originally Posted by MuyLocoNC

Yeah, I don't get my info from them. However, I do stand with the 31,000 American scientists that signed the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine's global warming petition against the horseshit that is MMGW. They must ALL be in the Koch brother's pocket.

The Oregon Petition, sponsored by the OISM, was circulated in April 1998
in a bulk mailing to tens of thousands of U.S. scientists. In addition
to the petition, the mailing included what appeared to be a reprint of a
scientific paper. Authored by OISM's Arthur B. Robinson, Sallie L. Baliunas, Willie Soon, and Zachary W. Robinson,
the paper was titled "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric
Carbon Dioxide" and was printed in the same typeface and format as the
official Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Also included was a reprint of a December 1997, Wall Street Journal editorial, "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth", by Arthur and Zachary Robinson. A cover note signed "Frederick Seitz/Past
President, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A./President Emeritus,
Rockefeller University", may have given some persons the impression that
Robinson's paper was an official publication of the academy's
peer-reviewed journal. The blatant editorializing in the pseudopaper,
however, was uncharacteristic of scientific papers.


In addition to the bulk mailing, OISM's website enables people to add
their names to the petition over the Internet, and by June 2000 it
claimed to have recruited more than 19,000 scientists. The institute is
so lax about screening names, however, that virtually anyone can sign,
including for example Al Caruba, a pesticide-industry PR man and conservative ideologue who runs his own website called the "National Anxiety Center."
Caruba has no scientific credentials whatsoever, but in addition to
signing the Oregon Petition he has editorialized on his own website
against the science of global warming, calling it the "biggest hoax of
the decade," a "genocidal" campaign by environmentalists who believe
that "humanity must be destroyed to 'Save the Earth.' . . . There is no
global warming, but there is a global political agenda, comparable to
the failed Soviet Union experiment with Communism, being orchestrated by
the United Nations, supported by its many Green NGOs, to impose
international treaties of every description that would turn the
institution into a global government, superceding the sovereignty of
every nation in the world."

When questioned in 1998, OISM's Arthur Robinson admitted that only
2,100 signers of the Oregon Petition had identified themselves as
physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, or meteorologists, "and of
those the greatest number are physicists."

Hey muyloco

tell us again how you listen to a bunch of nut balls for your disinformation

Originally Posted by ChesusRice

The Oregon Petition, sponsored by the OISM, was circulated in April 1998
in a bulk mailing to tens of thousands of U.S. scientists. In addition
to the petition, the mailing included what appeared to be a reprint of a
scientific paper. Authored by OISM's Arthur B. Robinson, Sallie L. Baliunas, Willie Soon, and Zachary W. Robinson,
the paper was titled "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric
Carbon Dioxide" and was printed in the same typeface and format as the
official Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Also included was a reprint of a December 1997, Wall Street Journal editorial, "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth", by Arthur and Zachary Robinson. A cover note signed "Frederick Seitz/Past
President, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A./President Emeritus,
Rockefeller University", may have given some persons the impression that
Robinson's paper was an official publication of the academy's
peer-reviewed journal. The blatant editorializing in the pseudopaper,
however, was uncharacteristic of scientific papers.


In addition to the bulk mailing, OISM's website enables people to add
their names to the petition over the Internet, and by June 2000 it
claimed to have recruited more than 19,000 scientists. The institute is
so lax about screening names, however, that virtually anyone can sign,
including for example Al Caruba, a pesticide-industry PR man and conservative ideologue who runs his own website called the "National Anxiety Center."
Caruba has no scientific credentials whatsoever, but in addition to
signing the Oregon Petition he has editorialized on his own website
against the science of global warming, calling it the "biggest hoax of
the decade," a "genocidal" campaign by environmentalists who believe
that "humanity must be destroyed to 'Save the Earth.' . . . There is no
global warming, but there is a global political agenda, comparable to
the failed Soviet Union experiment with Communism, being orchestrated by
the United Nations, supported by its many Green NGOs, to impose
international treaties of every description that would turn the
institution into a global government, superceding the sovereignty of
every nation in the world."

When questioned in 1998, OISM's Arthur Robinson admitted that only
2,100 signers of the Oregon Petition had identified themselves as
physicists, geophysicists, climatologists, or meteorologists, "and of
those the greatest number are physicists."

That's awesome, did you get it straight from Al Gore's blog? Or some other blogger of even higher standing? It almost rises to the level of fraud perpetrated by the IIPC and the "cooked" number of climatoligists that signed on with them. That and all the false reports and scaaaary predictions that have now been exposed.

Originally Posted by MuyLocoNC

That's awesome, did you get it straight from Al Gore's blog? Or some other blogger of even higher standing? It almost rises to the level of fraud perpetrated by the IIPC and the "cooked" number of climatoligists that signed on with them. That and all the false reports and scaaaary predictions that have now been exposed.

Nope
Got it from sourcewatch
About as non partisan as it gets
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...e_and_Medicine

Originally Posted by ChesusRice

Nope
Got it from sourcewatch
About as non partisan as it gets
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...e_and_Medicine

Non partisan? You've got to be kidding. But it's an interesting read.

Originally Posted by NoDrama

Everyone is a Hypocrite, some just have more money than others do. Some of us just sit around all day collecting transfer payments. Its not the only Gubbermint subsidy I participate in either.

everyone is a hypocrite, not many people choose to be a hypocrite like you.

add hypocrisy to the list, right below plagiarism and general douchery.

Originally Posted by MuyLocoNC

Non partisan? You've got to be kidding. But it's an interesting read.

No I am not

They expose the money behind the democrats and the republicans

Give it up Muy

You are getting used

Feel dirty yet?

Originally Posted by ChesusRice

No I am not

They expose the money behind the democrats and the republicans

Give it up Muy

You are getting used

Feel dirty yet?

Sourcewatch self-describes as progressive. That is the current preferred term for leftist. cn