You guys made some good points. But even in cases like Sandusky, death would be too easy. It wud be much better justice for him to eat cock meat sammiches every day for life. Also, many men are wrongly convicted, especially in rape cases. Tookie Williams was a good example of a man that was executed because of a false conviction. Plus, I believe criminals should re rehabilitated instead of punished. In Isreal they have a great prison system.
With Dna and forensics it is much rarer for innocent men to be convicted as opposed to 20 years ago..Sandusky will get 3 hots n a cot ..be segregated and have his own cell or be with another scumbag who can't be in gen pop...so 30k a year to keep this piece of garbage alive? fuck that..kill his dirty ass.
Argue for your opinion because it is true, not because it is your opinion.
Please check out my Micropropagation journal
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...tion-grow.html
Monetary restitution if possible is an option. I think the only reason to kill is to defend from immediate threat, although I understand the thoughts of vengeance some people have if their loved one or child was murdered, raped etc.
Low life people exist and I do not want to pay to sustain them, therefore a very small island might suffice to isolate them. I share concerns about executing an innocent person and don't think government sanctioned killing of somebody is harmonious with advancing humanity. Kind of interesting that many religions forbid killing, yet many of their practitioners are all about killing people.
As an aside I think the government has granted itself the power to execute people for a large quantity of pot....so those who support the death penalty...careful what you wish for.
AN ACT OF RESPECT WHEN DEMANDED BECOMES AN ACT OF SUBMISSION
There is not a state in this country that executes people for pot, Some people are born bad..they do disgusting things and are wasting oxygen..kill em...look at that scumbag who killed 50 some women in new mexico..why keep this dirty hillbilly alive?
Federal law for very large amounts can result in death penalty. I'm not in favor of "keeping him alive", I'm in favor of putting him on a very small island...his fate will then be decided by his neighbors.
I won't kill him unless he's threatening me with immediate harm, but if you want to pull the trigger that would be your choice. Why not go carry out "justice" and go do it yourself? Why have a substitute do it for you?
What do hill billies have to do with this?
AN ACT OF RESPECT WHEN DEMANDED BECOMES AN ACT OF SUBMISSION
Bookmarks