The important question is how are we going to use the new income we collect from the rich......So far all we have is hire unneeded public union workers that we don't want. Gotta pay back those lobbies...... So far in the last three weeks Obama has fucked up immigration even more, went out publicly trying to funnel money into unions, and covered up a serious crime against humanity. He keeps this shit up, this is going to be a landslide election.
"My god ... it's full of stars!" - David Bowman neerGreen 2: Soilless grow
When a cause comes along and you know in your bones that it is just, yet refuse to defend it-at that moment you begin to die. And I have never seen so many corpses walking around talking about justice." -Mumia Abu Jamal
recession, a country's economy produces less, and people have trouble finding jobs. Government steps in to try to help smooth out these fluctuations and dull the pain of sharp economic downturns.
Adjusting the tax policy is one way to affect the economy, and the U.S. government has been using tax policy this way almost since the inception of the national income tax in 1913. Although economists agree that changing how a government taxes its citizens can have some dramatic effects on an economy, they disagree on which policy is best. Trickle-down theory represents one such idea that can supposedly spur economic growth.
*In a nu*tshell, trickle-down theory is based on the premise that within an economy, giving tax breaks to the top earners makes them more likely to earn more. Top earners invest that extra money in productive economic activities or spend more of their time at the high-paying trade they do best (whether that be creating inventions or performing heart surgeries). Either way, these activities will be productive, reinvigorate economic growth and, in the end, generate more tax revenue from these earners and the people they've helped. According to the theory, this boost in growth will ultimately help those in lower income brackets as well. Although trickle-down economics is often associated with the policies of Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, the theory dates back to the 1920s. The name also has roots in the '20s, when humorist Will Rogers coined the term, saying, "The money was all appropriated for the top in the hopes it would trickle down to the needy"
It worked post Kennedy. It worked post Reagan. Will it continue to work? I don't know, the world is a different place than it was in Kennedy's time. It seems to me the biggest head wind the US faces is the economic recovery of Europe post WWII and the rise of the Asian countries as competitors in the economic sphere. After WWII the US was more or less the only economy left standing and the US had beefed up industrial capacity for the war effort. Economically, the world was our oyster from 1945 to about 1975.