NorCal Mother charged with Child Abuse

Originally Posted by ginjawarrior

one would be the misguided practice of trying to help the kid the other is plain ol' criminal negligence

if you can't sort your kid out by explaining what they did wrong and have to resort to violence, not only that but your so deafeated by the size difference between you the adult and your child that you have to use a weapon to hit our kid then you not only fail at being a parent but you fail at being a fucking human

yeah thats bullshit i aways found the kids that got shit beaten out of them didnt end up being the shiny pillars of society

it doent work beating your dog and it doesnt work with kids

so the state should never step in to protect kids from shit stains of parents because the family knows best?
would you say that about child rape?
honour killings?
what about poisonings from munchausen by proxy?
repeated broken limbs from the beatings?

i guess if the family is so sacred and the old ways are best then you'd support the husband beating the shit out of his wife for having dinner on the table 5 mins too late?




pretty fucking easy to keep pot away from your kid

You obviously havnt nor have ever been around kids. Your ideological bullshit doesn't work in reality.

Tell your kids what they did wrong? They f king know what they did wrong, they need to know there's consequences to their actions, you retard. I know you havnt got kids cos your hippy crap doesn't work in the real world.

EDIT: Btw genius, I never said I smack my kids, just I don't feel it's my place to parent someone else's kids on their behalf.

Originally Posted by Harrekin

You obviously havnt nor have ever been around kids. Your ideological bullshit doesn't work in reality.

Tell your kids what they did wrong? They f king know what they did wrong, they need to know there's consequences to their actions, you retard. I know you havnt got kids cos your hippy crap doesn't work in the real world.

please tell me how does using a weapon explain the consequences to the kid?

i have kids i never raise my hand or any weapon to them you can discipline your kids perfectly well without the thug mentality

Originally Posted by ginjawarrior

so the state should never step in to protect kids from shit stains of parents because the family knows best?
would you say that about child rape?
honour killings?
what about poisonings from munchausen by proxy?
repeated broken limbs from the beatings?

i guess if the family is so sacred and the old ways are best then you'd support the husband beating the shit out of his wife for having dinner on the table 5 mins too late?

you never did answer these i would like to know where you stand on them

Originally Posted by ginjawarrior

you never did answer these i would like to know where you stand on them

I refuse to take the bait on your bullshit examples.

Were the children in this case subject to any of the above?

You sound like a typical Neo-con, gotta control the masses "bedroom invader" style, we can't have the plebs living "immoral" lives.

EDIT: Also I never said people could "beat the shit" outta their kids, ever heard the expression "wrap across the knuckles"?

Originally Posted by Harrekin

I refuse to take the bait on your bullshit examples.

Were the children in this case subject to any of the above?

You sound like a typical Neo-con, gotta control the masses "bedroom invader" style, we can't have the plebs living "immoral" lives.

"Either way, the House Invading State pigs need to leave families alone, natural law forbids one from interfering in the family of another, it's nature and ultimately it's none of their fucking business. "

i can find plenty of examples of all those things i listed happening now do you think that the state should be involved in such cases or not

this notion is very much to do with what happened in the op its just a question where the line is for people

Originally Posted by Harrekin

I refuse to take the bait on your bullshit examples.

Were the children in this case subject to any of the above?

You sound like a typical Neo-con, gotta control the masses "bedroom invader" style, we can't have the plebs living "immoral" lives.

EDIT: Also I never said people could "beat the shit" outta their kids, ever heard the expression "wrap across the knuckles"?

i missed the edit but according to you it wouldn't be anyone's business if they beat the shit out of their kid? you wouldn't want to sound like a "typical Neo-con" in saying its wrong would you?

or is it that you have a line too?

Originally Posted by ginjawarrior

i missed the edit but according to you it wouldn't be anyone's business if they beat the shit out of their kid? you wouldn't want to sound like a "typical Neo-con" in saying its wrong would you?

or is it that you have a line too?

There's a difference between a slap and an injury, the child above wasn't injured in any way so the pigs should just mind their own business. Same as dipping a pacifier in some whiskey, no injury done, no lasting physical or psychological harm infact it works as a non-harmful pain relief.

Basically if it doesn't leave a bruise, mind your own business, is it that hard for people to leave other people alone?

[

[/QUOTE]Guess I'll be first to say. Mom has some big tits^^^^^