31 dems to vote against Holder?

Originally Posted by ink the world

Yes!!

I mean he completely defied Congress and a weapons embargo by selling weapons to Iran to fund a shadow war in South America....oops wrong POTUS

Us and them... tired of bashing Bush so you're going back to Reagan, again? We're never going to get anywhere blaming the past while having a total disregard for it.

Originally Posted by Ringsixty

question, can they still prosecute him after he leaves office or is that it?

They can but wont, congress wants answers now with that said if they find he in anyway authroized it or knew about it while it was active they will nail him to the cross and I would support that if it is the case.

I am sure that all admins have lied to us for years but in todays age it is just flat out going to come to the top. With that said I am still mad that it took a reporter to write a book about congres and insider trading. Proves that like it or not they are all crooks and liars. I mean really, insider trading was not a rule???? People like you and I investing and they just taking our money. Sad shit,

The thing that bugs me the most, blood is boiling, is when they released the info on Seal team 6 being the ones that got Osama. Less than 60 days later that team, most of it, was shot down in afg on the border. I mean lets just paint a target on our heros. Sad stuff

Originally Posted by chrishydro

The thing that bugs me the most, blood is boiling, is when they released the info on Seal team 6 being the ones that got Osama. Less than 60 days later that team, most of it, was shot down in afg on the border. I mean lets just paint a target on our heros. Sad stuff

Haven't you heard? It's ALL about Obama.

Originally Posted by Mr Neutron

Us and them... tired of bashing Bush so you're going back to Reagan, again? We're never going to get anywhere blaming the past while having a total disregard for it.

Stating historical fact isn't bashing.

It really points out the hypocrisy more than anything else. I didn't excuse anyone at all, in fact I didn't really comment on Holder at all did I?

Originally Posted by ink the world

Stating historical fact isn't bashing.

It really points out the hypocrisy more than anything else. I didn't excuse anyone at all, in fact I didn't really comment on Holder at all did I?

obama derangement syndrome.

if they had to look at everything in historical context, they'd realize that the sky isn't falling. and that isn't good news for their savior willard.

Originally Posted by ink the world

Stating historical fact isn't bashing.

It really points out the hypocrisy more than anything else. I didn't excuse anyone at all, in fact I didn't really comment on Holder at all did I?

Hypocrisy? How so?