Florida woman DOES NOT kill her attacker, gets 20 years

**NoDrama** · 05-15-2012, 01:45 PM

Originally Posted by tip top toker

So do you not consider someone a victim unless their is physical suffering? Seems to me it's a bit like saying that there is no such thing as a victim of racist abuse unless there was physical harm.

So are you trying to tell me that the husband is now a victim? I think you have it the wrong way around there buddy. The poor woman did not inflict years of mental abuse on her husband and then scare him shitless with a gunshot that wasn't even aimed at him. The Husband inflicted years of abuse on HER, she hurt no one. If this was not clear from the beginning then I apologize.

BTW NOWHERE did I say PHYSICAL abuse.

**NoDrama** · 05-15-2012, 01:49 PM

Originally Posted by tip top toker

racist abuse .

Where is the racist abuse? I don't see it, where is it?

**tip top toker** · 05-15-2012, 01:53 PM

Yes, she used a lethal weapon to instill fear. That seems like abuse to me, NO MATTER what the husband may have done in the past. I am not saying that either is right in their actions, they are both guilty parties so far as i am concerned.

One can argue that there was no need for her to fire the gun in the first place because he had not abused her and as such she was not a victim in that instance. If the issue is that the husband put years of mental abuse on her, then she should have fucking left, not let it build up to the point where she just pulls out a gun.

Fantastic attempt to twist some words on the racism point, lol, quite clear you are not worth debating with. But you are ABSOLUTELY right, if there is no harm t body or property then there cannot possibly be a victim.

**NoDrama** · 05-15-2012, 01:58 PM

Originally Posted by tip top toker

So do you not consider someone a victim unless their is physical suffering? Seems to me it's a bit like saying that there is no such thing as a victim of racist abuse unless there was physical harm.

What racist abuse are you talking about?

**tip top toker** · 05-15-2012, 02:00 PM

it's called a comparison. Or have you not noticed the words prior to those you have highlighted? Are you really this immature? You have stated that there can be no victim unless there is damage to body or property..

**NoDrama** · 05-15-2012, 02:01 PM

Originally Posted by tip top toker

Yes, she used a lethal weapon to instill fear.

She wasn't trying to instill fear, she was only demonstrating her compassion by not putting it between his eyes.

This only goes to show that if you are going to pull a gun on someone, it is almost always better to just blow them away, corpses don't go on the witness stand.

**NoDrama** · 05-15-2012, 02:02 PM

Originally Posted by tip top toker

it's called a comparison. Or have you not noticed the words prior to those you have highlighted? Are you really this immature? You have stated that there can be no victim unless there is damage to body or property..

o....... I feel small now.