There has never been a regulation or tax that 'Libertarian' Bucky didn't love.Originally Posted by UncleBuck
Tetris Champion!
this is your problem: dishonesty.
i never professed love for the estate tax, i simply pointed out that red's scenario of family farms keeling over left and right from the estate tax was false. it's been debunked over and over again FFS.
you're going to have a tough time in college with mental musings like yours.
Odd, then that there are so few family owned farms left.
You did profess to be a Libertarian yet you defend every plant placement regulation or death tax that you can. You are so awesome.
Oh I was going to ask you this yesterday... my neighbor is tilling a garden and YOU CAN SEE IT FROM THE ROAD. Should I call in the feds to fine him for his vegetable obnoxiousness?
Tetris Champion!
why don't you tell me how many family farms went under because of the estate tax, you misguided coot.
Tetris Champion!
quote me "professing to be a libertarian". lol.
you should also try to quote me defending the estate tax. you can easily find me calling out someone's lies about the estate tax above, but no defense. just a calling out of a liar.
Tetris Champion!
since you insist on mischaracterizing even the simplest of all things, i'm going to go ahead and call you a blithering fucktard.
the feds have nothing to do with towns and neighborhoods making rules about what your front yard should look like you failed abortion.
i thought old mcronald tardbots like yourself wanted control to be held at the most local level possible, as is the case with front yard gardens. you contradict yourself all the time and you run with it because you are too much of a dullard to realize your fail. you irksome blatherskite.
Bucky's out of ammo, has nothing but insults left.
Obama's health care shenanigans, are unconstitutional in more than one way, and breach several sections of multiple amendments, directly and indirectly. No amount of lawyers or "court decisions" will be able to convey the delusion, that it is somehow constitutional.
You're apparently convinced that Obama's health care mandates are constitutional, and no matter what facts are thrown at you, you will refuse to change your delusion that "they are constitutional". This is because your beliefs that the mandates are constitutional, are the beliefs that are backing your fantasy-world wishes.
Your general theory on constitutionality in regards to law is incredibly ignorant. If interpreted correctly, by your beliefs it would be legal to make ammunition illegal, even though that indirectly infringes on the 2nd amendment. When you can't comprehend how a law is actually illegal, based on it's direct or indirect affect on superior constitutional law, what are you eligible in comprehending?
By SS, I'm assuming you mean social security. Social security while technically constitutional, is bogus as well, no matter how it's structured (at least it's constitutional though). I don't need to argue against Social Security though, because no matter how it's legally or constitutionally backed, it's fallacy-orientated creation and structure, will take care of itself. Social security will self implode on it's own, because it's not sustainable. Social security has done nothing but caused financial irresponsibility among the people in this country. Systems that manifest irresponsibility, fed off the roots of unsustainability are destined to fail.
Anytime one tries to justify the violation of natural human rights, in order to increase the quality of another human being's natural rights, not only have they attempted to justify hypocrisy, they've lost all worthiness in what they believe, are credible opinions.
Posting Permissions
58Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks