Ginja, you clearly don't understand how wind resistance works. Some objects have considerably less of it, some have considerably more (ie: a relatively flat pieces that can catch the air vs sharp or round objects that are more streamlined).
What you are suggesting doesn't support anything. The top of the building hits the ground in under 11 seconds, which is a number compatible with freefall + wind resistance.
So you are completely wrong.
The fact the building started to lean but then stopped mid air is equally ridiculous and just shows that it would have collapsed as I said in the post above unless of course the remaining support was pulled out in a symmetrical fashion (which it was, with explosives or some other similar kind of force that most certainly was not jet fuel).
Again, you folks believe that when you smash a car fast enough into something it won't lose any speed.
As far as the static vs dynamic thing is concerned, there wasn't anything to turn this into a large dynamic load unless huge sections of support columns magically disappeared simultaneously to avoid the building tipping over into the street. And even if it was a large dynamic load, the lower building wouldn't offer no resistance at all and it wouldn't happen symmetrically. But of course that isn't what happened.
Last edited by OGEvilgenius; 05-09-2012 at 11:33 AM.
"All previous attempts to base money solely on intangibles such as credit or government edict, or fiat, have ended in inflationary panic and disaster"– Winston Churchill
For everyone on here that believes that our own government pulled 9/11 off I just wanna start of my saying your probably one of the biggest jerk-offs people talk to in real life just so you know. And second off if all you do is bitch about where you live and how its run and you feel like they are going to terrorize you and fly R/c choppers into your house until you shit falls down so you can say THEY DID IT AGAIN. Then just move to another country plain, instead of researching bogus shit like you do, look up another country to live in see what they're government gets involved into, how they're politicians help the people and they're standards of living if that matters to you and there is plenty more you could read up on to occupy your time from what your reading now.
Two pool balls are close in mass. It's all relative. Two cars. If you take a gigantic run at my pickup with your midsize pickup I guarantee when you slam into it your speed will decrease dramatically. And if you only took a couple car lengths run, you'd end up at a rate of speed just that much slower (and in fact you might end up just being stopped outright if my truck was parked against a large building or wall... or a building parked on the earth).
Newtonian physics apply in all of these examples and the laws do not change.
Giant plane vs core = plane gone core hardly touched.
Evidence?
Let me know when you find an airplane that is made of something remotely hard. LOL airplanes are made of lightweight materials, mostly aluminum, synthetics and plastics. The fuel they carry is pretty much Kerosene, a chemical they don't use to melt anything. Fuel that in the open air barely makes paper catch fire, a fuel that when presented with a 80 foot thick reinforced concrete and steel girder core that is covered with the best natural insulator known to mankind is just going to fail from all the heat?
"All previous attempts to base money solely on intangibles such as credit or government edict, or fiat, have ended in inflationary panic and disaster"– Winston Churchill
funny did you miss the bit where nodrama said this?cause with the photo's i just shown that lie glares out to meYou trying to convince us that one of the WTC towers fell onto #7, this is going to be fun to watch you try and prove that one. The fact that WTC towers fell 5 hours before WTC#7 did pretty much proves you wrong right there.
Bookmarks