Erpsssarwtc

Why do you think that Ron Paul Supporters don't support a women's right to choose? I am a Ron Paul supporter and I do...being a "Ron Paul Supporter" doesn't mean you nessecarily agree with everything he says or believes morally...you could be a gay pro-choice female black jew muslim socialist and still support Dr Paul because his philosophy supports you. I would say that most Ron Paul supporters are likely to be "pro-choice" or at least half because of his stance on social issues.

Regardless, Ron Paul doesn't believe in policing/legistaling morality, and he doesn't believe you can police abortion, he just simply doesn't think it should beFUNDED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNEMENT either FOR/AGAINST....This is rooted in the libertarian non-agression principle because it is the STATE commiting act of violence toward people. You just don't seem to understand that. Dr Paul Prescribes morning after and birth control pills, hes an OB, he doesn't believe in a consitutional amendment regarding abortion, and finally his "Pro-life" voting record in the eyes of evangelicals is incredibly poor (under 50%)...some democrats are rated better...

Hmm let me try this.

Eosssaacrtbcatbhosiabtcicoii


Every
Obama
supporter
should
support
an
American
citizens
right
to
be
charged
and
tried
before
he
or
she
is
assasainated
by
the
commander
in
chief
or
Imprisioned
indefinitely.

Originally Posted by UncleBuck

Every
Ron
Paul
Supporter
Should
Support
A
Woman's
Right
To
Choose

a woman owns her body in a more important way then a business owner owns their business.

at any time and without warning during a pregnancy, her life can be at risk due to unexpected complications.

paulistas have no problem accepting that states have the right to tell a woman what she may or may not do with her own body during the most vulnerable and difficult of times.

do you really want to be like santorum and allow certain states to make sure that rape babies (gifts) are mandated to be carried to term by a citizen who owns her own body? not every state would go by ronald's moral standard, which is prudish at best.

and shouldn't we be encouraging "a stitch in time saves nine" philosophy? shouldn't we be subsidizing birth control to help prevent unplanned pregnancies and abortions? i mean, the pills are not a problem with respect to abortion, they reduce the number of abortions. i think we can all say that we want to reduce the number of abortions, no matter which side of the aisle you fall on.

the immorality of women not wanting to be impregnated, much less, forced by the state government to carry to term a rape baby or one that somehow got by the problematic birth control pill is worthy of addressing in front of millions of viewers on live TV. ronald and santorum both made sure to do so when given the chance, even after the crowd booed the very question as if it were not worthy.

end point: if you believe a business has the right to do basically whatever it wants, you should really believe that a woman (and you for that matter) have a right to do what you please with your own bodies without any government interference whatsoever.

Yawn.... Strawman.

You remind me of the Christian's that "hate" gay people but they spend more time talking about gays than the gay people themselves...

You hate Ron Paul, he's shit in your mind. He has no chance. Why do you devote so many of your posts to him? You have a secret crush?





Gary Johnson 2012

Originally Posted by BA142

You remind me of the Christian's that "hate" gay people but they spend more time talking about gays than the gay people themselves...

You hate Ron Paul, he's shit in your mind. He has no chance. Why do you devote so many of your posts to him? You have a secret crush?





Gary Johnson 2012

I think the issue here is they have been talking about this shit for years now. Its old.

image.png

More people should be like good guy Greg here. Why dont you go count the amount of Ron Paul threads started by our libertarian leaning community here. It never ends. I mean with the exception of Uncle Bucks Ron Paul losing thread there are at least 7 Ron Paul threads in the first 3 pages on top of all of the anti-Obama conspiracy threads too (Most posting in those are also Ron Paul supporters).


edit-
I can only speak for myself but thats whats grinds my gears about it. Its a constant shit storm of a misled Ron Paul supporter version of American exceptionalism.


be.jpg



Here's 16 pages of Ron Paul threads. ENJOY!

http://www.rollitup.org/search.php?s...d=20429530&pp=


I bet if you searched Obama in our search engine youd see 90% threads are bashing him, also made by non Obama supporters who have a tendency to make Ron Paul threads.

http://www.rollitup.org/search.php?searchid=20429540 Go ahead click it You wont see very many supportive Obama threads.

Maybe were on to a pattern here

Here's some Bucky porn. Enjoy!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UX7go...e_gdata_player

Originally Posted by ThatGuy113

I think the issue here is they have been talking about this shit for years now. Its old.

image.png

More people should be like good guy Greg here. Why dont you go count the amount of Ron Paul threads started by our libertarian leaning community here. It never ends. I mean with the exception of Uncle Bucks Ron Paul losing thread there are at least 7 Ron Paul threads in the first 3 pages on top of all of the anti-Obama conspiracy threads too (Most posting in those are also Ron Paul supporters).


edit-
I can only speak for myself but thats whats grinds my gears about it. Its a constant shit storm of a misled Ron Paul supporter version of American exceptionalism.


be.jpg



Here's 16 pages of Ron Paul threads. ENJOY!

http://www.rollitup.org/search.php?s...d=20429530&pp=


I bet if you searched Obama in our search engine youd see 90% threads are bashing him, also made by non Obama supporters who have a tendency to make Ron Paul threads.

http://www.rollitup.org/search.php?searchid=20429540 Go ahead click it You wont see very many supportive Obama threads.

Maybe were on to a pattern here

With those kind of numbers, maybe it's not the Ron Paul supporters who are mislead!!!???

The only reason ron paul threads become so long is because the people who love to hate him really, they would just die off immedietly without any discussion if there wasn't like the 4 people on here who passionately hate him and troll the threads, aside from that Ron Paul threads are created because of current events, when there is nothing new with Ron Paul then there isn't Ron Paul threads, the threads only stay on the front page because they are actively trolled, its not so much the supporters that are "beating a dead horse" but the haters, the haters are also the ones who repeat the exact same shit over and over. How many times are you going to post that picture of "Greg" and tell people to shut the fuck up? Really? You STFU :P

This is illustrated by looking at the Ron Paul threads that don't have haters posting in them, they get a few responses and immedietly die off, there is a few of them like that, they must of took place while unclebuck was on vacation.