Erpsssarwtc

Originally Posted by Mr Neutron

Rights are not granted by the state.

rights are not granted by anyone, genius.

so if your cock is inside a women's body, does that mean your cock is part of her body?

Originally Posted by UncleBuck

rights are not granted by anyone, genius.

So rights are granted by the 14th which was written by a person. Which was based on other documents, mostly religious. Meaning rights are granted by man pretending to be god?

Originally Posted by Canna Sylvan

So rights are granted by the 14th which was written by a person. Which was based on other documents, mostly religious. Meaning rights are granted by man pretending to be god?

rights are guaranteed by documents like the constitution, but they are not granted by anyone. you are born with them.

Originally Posted by UncleBuck

rights are not granted by anyone, genius.

A man who deliberately inflicts violence on the language will almost certainly inflict violence on human beings . . . Those who treasure the meaning of words will treasure truth, and those who bend words to their purposes are very likely in pursuit of anti-social ones. —Paul Johnson, Enemies of Society

Originally Posted by Mr Neutron

A man who deliberately inflicts violence on the language will almost certainly inflict violence on human beings . . . Those who treasure the meaning of words will treasure truth, and those who bend words to their purposes are very likely in pursuit of anti-social ones. —Paul Johnson, Enemies of Society

Originally Posted by deprave

• This is the minimum characters required for a post, my response is in red
  
  
  

  
  

So fun fact of the day, James Madison (FEDERALIST) wrote the Virginian Constitution. Do you know whats special about that Constitution? It was directly used for the bill of rights shaving off only 2 rights taking the number from 12 to 10 amendments. Hmmmm I wonder what Madison's true intent was when he wrote the Virginian Constitution. I doubt his intent was based off of anti federalist ideals.


Now its time for to time travel for a couple days. Ill get back at you when I am through with reading up on the Constitutional Convention and the justification for a federal government that caters to equal rights.

Originally Posted by Mr Neutron

If that is the case, then why is it when a pregnant woman and her "group of cells" is killed by a drunk driver, the drunk driver is charged with causing 2 deaths? AND how can a "group of cells" survive being born prematurely?

I am not up on each state's law but commonly it is only after a certain number of weeks that such can be charged and there is also in all states a certain number of weeks after which it has to be medically necessary to have the procedure. This ignorance is Exactly why this should not be debated soley by men!