Not my job to educate you. You would just call me names anyway. After all, your whole debating style is limited to repeating the same ridiculous assertions over and over and insulting anyone who disagrees with you.
While we don't have all of the evidence there are facts that have been established.
Martin is dead.
Zimmerman Shot him and has been charged.
Really the dispute is Who was standing their ground.
The way it appears to me is Martin was standing his ground against an unknown pursuer and was shot as a result. Of course this is my opinion based on what's out there.
You know one thing I think people are forgetting, Trayvon Martin was completely innocent, he was minding his own buisiness, probably trying to line up some trim on the phone. Zimmerman had absolutely no right to pursue him. He was not acting on behalf of the neighborhood association. Martin had no obligation to explain himself to Zimmerman, or did Zimmerman have the right to follow him, question him or attempt to detain him. Of course this would be true even if he was in the commision of a crime.
Perhaps his pistol made him feel invinsable and he was thinking "C'mon punk, Make My Day." Oh wait that's the Colorado law!
Last edited by budleydoright; 05-27-2012 at 08:16 PM.