1094Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quotewhat if tray did attack him you will all look like idiots
"If you can't say it clearly, you don't understand it yourself." - John Searle
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/514859-afrawfraws-second-grow-journal.html
what if tray did attack him you will all look like idiots
Last edited by wisconsin420; 05-03-2012 at 11:57 PM.
Tetris Champion!
versus you, who just made yourself look like an idiot.Originally Posted by wisconsin420
no one knows who attacked who, the prosecution has already tipped their hat on this.
If the prosecution freely admits they don't know who attacked who, then doesn't that just dip their entire case in reasonable doubt? OR is the state going to do something similar to what they did with the Casey Anthony trial and just try to advance their "theory" in the absence of any REAL evidence? It didn't work out so well! How and WHY would they even bother trying a case where the defendant will try to claim "self defense" or "stand your ground" when they can't even say for sure who attacked who? Doesn't this entire case pretty much hinge on who attacked who first? Didn't they learn anything last year?
343 You are not forgottenWater: The most essential compound
not really imo....if i was a juror and i had ..not sure who threw first punch..mutt zimm clearly initiated everything ...zimm is guilty... i think zimm pulled his piece and got scared and shot when martin went for the gun...martin feared (rightfully so) for his life ..zimm is the aggressor .....and as far a casey anthony the state fucked by not saying one simple phrase to the simpleton hay seeds in florida..."there is not a videotape of casey anthony committing this awful crime..but she did it no doubt..connect the dots it is very clear...reasonable doubt does not mean no eye witnesses ....
Zimmbomb stepped out of his truck? Why?
Case closed sluts
Not really. I would attack someone following me and yelling. The real question is did Zimm's actions instigate the altercation or try to minimize it. If the prosecution can prove that Zimmy had a viable retreat BEFORE he confronted TM, he's done. If the jury feels TM attacked out of aggression, not self defense, GZ walks.
Perhaps when TM is saying, "Help." Zimmerman felt bad and shot him like a horse? To a hunter, that's help. Right? If you downed a dear, and it was still yelling and kicking, you'd "Help it out", right?
P.S. This is real life, not law. Don't quote my post and then Florida Law. Jurors are human. You can strike testimony from paper, not the human brain.
Last edited by afrawfraw; 05-04-2012 at 08:55 AM.
"If you can't say it clearly, you don't understand it yourself." - John Searle
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/514859-afrawfraws-second-grow-journal.html
I realize this, but without knowing who attacked who first I don't think a jury will be able to convict. Sorry, he may very well be guilty but a lot of assumptions are being made by people who have no clue what happened. It seems like people are making these assumptions based on emotions. I find this troubling.
Why not? Does he not have the right to step out of his truck? I don't really understand this statement.
343 You are not forgotten
Intent, my fellow RIU'r.... Intent
I would LOVE to see the state PROVE that Zimmerman had the intent of killing Martin.
I also love when people say things like " I would attack him if he was following and yelling".
You sure would, and you would be the one going to jail and the one that loses a civil court case when you get sued for the aggressive act. A concerned citizen who is only trying to protect his own property and the property of his neighbors has every right in the world to ask anyone he wants what the fuck they are doing in the neighborhood. Every right. That person being asked has ZERO right to attack that inquiring person, No right whatsoever.
Zimmerman walks. As he should
Avenue of escape? Zimmerman didn't need to use any avenue of escape, that is what the whole SYG law is all about.
Imagination was given to man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is.- Oscar Wilde
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks