Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

GrowRebel · #1 02-04-2008, 08:59 AM

Since we all love to talk about 911 I found a video using a couple of movie (popular actor in it) to characterize what may have taken place ... then I have a video done by the very brave Alex Jones ...

about why Micheal Moore failed to mention a lot of facts in his 911 film ...

... I think if he had of been as open and honest in his movie about what really happen that day ... it would never have made it to the national theaters ... wouldn't you agree?

911 Vendetta 7 mins

This is the fiction ... but art does imitate life ...

Micheal Moore is a Fraud 9 mins

One thing I've always like about Jones ... he always backs up whatever he says with his sources ...

... over 100,000 views too ... good ...

So if you come to this thread claiming Jones is a nut ... you will have to do as he does and back up your claims with sources ... just like Jones ...
... none of that ... Polly what a cracker ... "he's got no evidence ... he's a nut" shit ... that don't fly ...

So enjoy the new thread ...

Everready · #2 02-04-2008, 10:45 AM

Jones is a nut because the Old media says he is...those guys on fake..er..propaganda...er...fox news are spot on!

It must be difficult for those who accept authority as the truth rather than truth as the authority.

medicineman · #3 02-04-2008, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowRebel

Since we all love to talk about 911 I found a video using a couple of movie (popular actor in it) to characterize what may have taken place ... then I have a video done by the very brave Alex Jones ...

about why Micheal Moore failed to mention a lot of facts in his 911 film ...

... I think if he had of been as open and honest in his movie about what really happen that day ... it would never have made it to the national theaters ... wouldn't you agree?

911 Vendetta 7 mins

This is the fiction ... but art does imitate life ...

Micheal Moore is a Fraud 9 mins

One thing I've always like about Jones ... he always backs up whatever he says with his sources ...

... over 100,000 views too ... good ...

So if you come to this thread claiming Jones is a nut ... you will have to do as he does and back up your claims with sources ... just like Jones ...
... none of that ... Polly what a cracker ... "he's got no evidence ... he's a nut" shit ... that don't fly ...

So enjoy the new thread ...

I think Michael Moore takes some Un-warranted abuse on this clip. I'd have to say the reasons Moore didn't go out on a limb and profess all these theories postulateds by Jones at the time of his film, was that they were too un-believable at that time. He certainly didn't aid and abet GW, it was clear to see that he abhorred the man, and at that time, what he did produce was quite a shock to the people. Had he gone with the more far out nuances of the Jones crowd, he would have been dismissed as a nutjob. What Jones says has a credible ring to it and after watching the Cheney-Bush regime for 7 years, reading books about Bush like (Bushwhacked By Molly Ivins) and coming to a greater understanding of world politics and US involvement, I can actually see Jones' point and give it creedence. But I don't agree with the Michael Moore Bashing. Look what he did with the movie "Sicko". I'm sure he raised awareness of the plight of medical care in the USA. I believe Michael Moore to be a positive force for enlightenment of the American people.

GrowRebel · #4 02-04-2008, 01:49 PM

I agree Moore has enlighten a great many with his films ... but Jones does have some valid points about Moore's 911 movie ... he did leave out a few facts the Jones pointed out ...
... and you are right ... if Moore came out exposing a lot of the lies around 911 they would never have allowed it to reach the theaters ...

... I wouldn't view it as Moore bashing ... more like calling him on some of his info ... or lack of in the movie ...

GrowRebel · #5 02-05-2008, 07:11 AM

Hey TED! ... you are just going to LOVE this article check it!

Willie Nelson: Twin Towers Were Imploded On 9/11
"I saw those towers fall and I've seen an implosion in Las Vegas - there's too much similarities between the two, and I saw a building fall that didn't get hit by nothing," added Nelson, referring to WTC Building 7 which collapsed in the late afternoon of September 11.
"How naive are we - what do they think we'll go for?," asked Nelson, pointing out that his doubts began on the very day of 9/11.
"I saw one fall and it was just so symmetrical, I said wait a minute I just saw that last week at the casino in Las Vegas and you see these implosions all the time and the next one fell and I said hell there's another one - and they're trying to tell me that an airplane did it and I can't go along with that," said Nelson.

GrowRebel · #6 02-06-2008, 08:07 AM

Dam Breaks, ABC Covers W. Nelson Story

Hey Teddy! ... You checking this out? Ha ha ha ha ...

... and check this out ... for the dummies that say the government had nothing to do with a cover up ... or 911 ...

911 Inquiry Head Try To Shield (I) bush
The head of the commission that investigated the Sept 11 terrorist attacks had closer ties to the White House than he admitted and tried to limit the Bush administration's responsibility for the incident, a book claims.

Why Were the 9/11 Tapes Destroyed?
Many Americans are content with the 9/11 Commission Report, but the two chairmen of the commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton are not. Neither was commission member Max Cleland, a US Senator who resigned from the 9/11 Commission, telling the Boston Globe (November 13, 2003): "This investigation is now compromised." Even former FBI director Louis Freeh wrote in the Wall Street Journal (Nov. 17, 2005) that there are inaccuracies in the commission's report and "questions that need answers."

Oh yeah ... right ... the government had nothing to do with 911 ...

ccodiane · #7 02-06-2008, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

I think Michael Moore takes some Un-warranted abuse on this clip. I'd have to say the reasons Moore didn't go out on a limb and profess all these theories postulateds by Jones at the time of his film, was that they were too un-believable at that time. He certainly didn't aid and abet GW, it was clear to see that he abhorred the man, and at that time, what he did produce was quite a shock to the people. Had he gone with the more far out nuances of the Jones crowd, he would have been dismissed as a nutjob. What Jones says has a credible ring to it and after watching the Cheney-Bush regime for 7 years, reading books about Bush like (Bushwhacked By Molly Ivins) and coming to a greater understanding of world politics and US involvement, I can actually see Jones' point and give it creedence. But I don't agree with the Michael Moore Bashing. Look what he did with the movie "Sicko". I'm sure he raised awareness of the plight of medical care in the USA. I believe Michael Moore to be a positive force for enlightenment of the American people.

Fuck that fat, white, male, hypocritical, pretentious, America hating, money grubbing, stock invested, multi-millionaire, Soros supported, slob of a propagandist fuck Moore-on!!!

Can't we all just get along.

bongspit · #8 02-06-2008, 10:28 AM

I find it amusing that the main problem some of these hillbilly fart-smellin conservatives have against Michael moore is that he is fat....

ccodiane · #9 02-06-2008, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongspit

I find it amusing that the main problem some of these hillbilly fart-smellin conservatives have against Michael moore is that he is fat....

Those first three were just things that Moore-on and MedMao have in common. It also just happens to be the first group both choose to rail against when given the opportunity to disparage a group. The "fat, lazy, white, rich, greedy, male, CEO?Doctor?etc.etc.etc.etc.". Hypocrisy at its finest.

ccodiane · #10 02-06-2008, 10:39 AM

Wait a second!!!...........what did you have to say about Fred Thompson? "Old, fat, lazy, stupid....." and on and on. Unreal.

Hypocrisy at its finest.