Thread: Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

Originally Posted by NoDrama

I suppose you also believe that we got into the Vietnam war because they attacked us in the Gulf of Tonkin?

lol if he believes that, he's totally insane. the govt literally released how gulf of tonkin was BS like 4 years ago.

These kids from we are change LA are awesome! They have taken "scientific proof of TEASON to members of congress and other DC Players". Copies of the paper sighting evidence of nano thermite being found in the dust at the WTC are being handed out to several members of congress ... Check out B. Franks ... the asshole acts like they own him money! He didn't want anything to do with it. Ried was the same way ... you should see all the fucking body guards that old fuck has ... Plus the members that they handed the paper to, are told either do something or be held complicit. Beautiful!
WACLA delivers scientific proof of TREASON to members of Congress and other D.C. players. DAY ONE

This is day two ... there was one congress woman who was receptive to the information.
Now notice folks in these video they will give the name and what committee if any these congress people are on. Pay particular attention to their reactions ... very interesting.
WACLA delivers scientific proof of TREASON to members of Congress and other D.C. players. DAY TWO

I tell ya these folks have got their shit together. They make me proud to be an American.

Here something from Alex Jones ...
Wayne Madsen on Alex Jones Tv NSA, Thermite & Flight 93!
Wayne talks about the report I posted about NSA coming down on any of their employees that talk about 911. They are doing everything they can to keep things quiet.
So many reports just crawling from the internet ... it's like it's never ending! ... move over Michael Jackson!

Here's another interesting report ... check this one out ...
Professor Pileni's Resignation as Editor-in-Chief of the Open Chemical Physics Journal
After the paper entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," which I along with eight colleagues co-authored, was published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal, its editor-in-chief, Professor Marie-Paule Pileni, abruptly resigned. It has been suggested that this resignation casts doubt on the scientific soundness of our paper.
However, Professor Pileni did the only thing she could do, if she wanted to save her career. After resigning, she did not criticize our paper. Rather, she said that she could not read and evaluate it, because, she claimed, it lies outside the areas of her expertise.
But that is not true, as shown by information contained on her own website (http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/pileni.htm). Her List of Publications reveals that Professor Pileni has published hundreds of articles in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology. She is, in fact, recognized as one of the leaders in the field. Her statement about her ”major advanced research” points out that, already by 2003, she was ”the 25th highest cited scientist on nanotechnology” (http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/pileni.htm

Here's a link to a video that give an into nanotechnology. It will wow you. They take a hair ... and say a nano is 100,000th of that ... wow.

Videos: Intro to Nanotech + 911 Truth
As the 911 Truth movement moves along it is a challenge for members of the Truth movement to keep informed. I hope these videos will help in this regard

The second video is a video that has already been posted. You can watch it again if you wish ... still very interesting.

Thats a niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice find Reb! i just wish more architects would join them in DEMANDING AN EXPLANATION !
(well we know what happened but they need to give us more excuses on why.............)

Check out this one. This guy is a controlled demolitions expert who had no previous knowledge about the collapse of WTC 7. He watched it before being told what it was and was in SHOCK when he finds out if fell on 9/11 as well.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=877gr6xtQIc

Nice find huffy ... and I get the impression this guy bought the bullshit about the other two towers ... so it was really a shock when he found out that tower fell on 911 too, he had no explanation other than it was demo

Here a video I found ... it's of a French comic that is talking about it. He plans to talk to Obama about it. That should be good if he video the interview. Funny how we have to depend on comics to get the real news.

Famous French Comic Bigard To Address Obama About 9/11
You may recall a previous article about the famous French Comic Jean-Marie Bigard published here on 911blogger in October 2008. Jean-Marie Bigard was fiercely criticized for publicly claiming that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an “enormous lie”. Since then he has become persona non grata in the media because of his “deviant thinking”.
However, Bigard isn’t letting all of this get him down: “Opening my big mouth cost me a lot. But I think what has cost me even more was keeping my big mouth shut. So now I’ve decided never to shut my big mouth again”, Bigard said recently.
He has two videos ... in the first he talks about the passport that was found ... in the second he ask the same questions I did about NORAD standing down. I hate the can laughs, but I guess that's how the French do it.


Here's another report for a calling for a new investigation ...
Ex-FBI Agent: Why I Support a New 9/11 Investigation
After 9-11, with the knowledge I had of the bitter internal dispute inside the FBI that was being hushed up but had kept some of our better agents from possibly uncovering more of the 9-11 plot before it happened, I couldn’t forget two of the slides in that Law Enforcement ethics curriculum: “DO NOT: Puff, Shade, Tailor, Firm up, Stretch, Massage, or Tidy up statements of fact.” And “Misplaced Loyalties: As employees of the FBI, we must be aware that our highest loyalty is to the United States Constitution. We should never sacrifice the truth in order to obtain a desired result (e.g. conviction of a defendant) or to avoid personal or institutional embarrassment.”


BREAKING NEWS!
NYCCAN
The New York City Coalition for Accountability Now has come together to lead a disciplined and patriotic search for answers about September 11th towards one tangible goal: the creation of an independent and impartial subpoena powered investigation into the September 11th attacks on our great nation.


On November 3, 2009, we will go to the polls to vote for answers to the unanswered questions and for solutions to the illnesses afflicting thousands of first responders and NYC residents.
This is great news ... if these guys and put the pressure on for an independent investigation, and they have a legal right to it ... there will be a lot of government elite sweating over it ... you can bet on that ... I will be watching closely this November.

More news ...



Washington set to buy Silverstein's WTC lease


The US government is poised to buy the lease on the destroyed World Trade Centre from the property magnate Larry Silverstein in an attempt to seize the initiative in the increasingly bitter dispute about the future of the site.
Webmaster's Commentary:
Because the dispute is calling attention to the very strange acquisition of the site by Silverman in the first place, and his even stranger buying of excessive anti-terror insurance on the complex.




Another video in response to WACLA ...

911 New Investigation - Ron Paul And Adam Kokesh Answer Sheriff Mack's Initiative


Retired Sheriff Richard Mack from Graham county, AZ. Recently authored "The Sheriff County - America's Last Hope" and in a recent interview he called for a new independent 911 investigation and offered to participate.

I found a dated video that really sums up the evidence well ... in fact I would love to hear from the government believers to explain a few things ... you guys are so good at it I can't wait to hear how you are going to disregard these "facts".
This video is on Google ... it is a little over 18 minutes long ... I know how the government believers never bother to watch any videos so I will write out the questions the video presented. Give us your brilliant explanation on this

911 Justice

Question 1 ...
Why was General Myers ... the man in charge of air defense was promoted to chairman of the joint chief of staff one week after the worst breech of military defense in history with not one shot fire to stop those planes? Why wasn't this man fired?

Question 2
At 1:45 min into the video it makes the point I made. We are expected to believe the that a slow moving large air craft can penetrate military air space and defense design to stop super sonic jets and missiles without being fire upon? Not to mention this plane was able to do it 50 minutes AFTER we knew the country was under attack. Please explain that one. Where was NORAD?

Question 3
At 2:15 the film state that we are expect to believe that before hitting the pentagon the plane was able to make a 250 degree turn exposing it's broad side and it not being fire upon? Reports revealed that if the plane had not made this incredible turn and went in on a straight course it would have hit the office of Rumsfeld and other top brass officials ... hummmm.

Question 4
3:45 into the video a Frank A DeMartini manager of the WTC construction & project management talks about how no skyscraper has ever collapse due to plane strike or fire ... and shows example of buildings ... that fell or collapsed in the past. He also states as I have that those building were design to withstand the impact of SEVERAL 707 which are heavier than the plane that hit the tower. 4:30 into the video he states why. Explain that one ... and please don't tried and tell us that the man in charge of construction of the towers is lying or doesn't know what he is talking about. That won't fly.

Remember folks documents show that all the plane fuel was gone 20 minutes after impact ... those infra-red photos I posted proves that ...

Question 5
5:00 into the video you see the explosions coming from the building as it collapses. They have arrows pointing them out. And it is not "force air" because you can see the same shit when they show a picture of a building being demo. Where did all the explosive force come from ... since we know the building cooled after the jet fuel ran out ... Explain that.

And if you want to go with the pancake theory ... don't ... the central tower was indestructable ... it would have still been standing. At 5:30 the video goes over the construction of the building and how it's impossible for it to come down for the reasons the government gave.

Question 6
At 6:00 into the video they show a building that pancaked in the past and it look NOTHING like what was left of the WTC. Where are the floors that should have been pancaked from the WTC? Explain that one.

6:20 into the video they show the explosive charges that took out the building then showed a building being demo ... same shit different day.

Question 7
At 8:11 they show Larry Silverstein stating "they" decided to have WTC 7 demolished ... who are "they" and how could "they" place explosives in key positions in a burning building? That shit takes months of planning so how did "they" know "they" were going to need to "pull" a building on 911? Plus how do we know that "they" didn't "pull" the other buildings as well?

Question 8
At 11:50 the video shows documents of drills the military did 3 months before 911 where planes flew into the WTC, yet Rice claimed they never dream that could happen ... explain that one.

Question 9
At 14:00 the video makes the same aguement I made about the fighters ... not to mention the fact that they DIDN'T need orders to shoot down planes that go off course ... someone gave an order NOT to shoot ... but listen to this part ...
At 15:14 into the video a guy by the name of Norman Mineta the transportation secretary accidently told the bogus 911 commission who gave the order NOT TO intercept those planes ... guess who? Explain to us government believes why when the aid kept coming to the bunker stating the distance of the plane as it closed in ... when he returned for the last time and told them the plane was 10 miles out and ask did the order still stand he was told "of course the order still stands ... have you heard anything to the contrary?" What was that order? We know it couldn't have been to intercept ... now don't we ... I'd love to hear you government believers so called explanation on that one. It's more proof that 911 was indeed an inside job.

Folks on their best day these government believers will never be able to explain away the evidence presented in this video ... NO WAY ... but lets see if they make a feeble attempt.

does anybody see the resembelance between 911 and out country becoming socialist. and germany's socialist govt burning the reichstag??

I know in late 2002 I seen a pic of the left side of flgt 77. I never seen that pic again. Ive scoured for years looking for that pic.

Almost looked digitally enhanced, from the gate vids or helipad area at the pent. I swear to you i seen the plane and the sun glaring off the windows, and the cockpit, a plane, almost level to the ground, gears up, I could see 3 passengers faces on the plane, a woman, with a look of horror on her face, it may have been fake, but stuck with me for years.

Everytime I hear about a conspiracy, I try to think of that pic that I KNOW I SEEN, and remind myself how much it made me change my thoughts and views on this.

All the gov has to do is release this vid, or pic to us to shut the conspiracy down. I believe they won't, because they value the lives of more than proving something in my own heart I believe that. Its not my religion twisting me, or thoughts planted conveniently in my mind. I know what I seen that day I cried nonstop.