Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :) - Page 21

hom36rown · #**201** 06-05-2008, 01:32 AM

lmao....thats funny shit

ZenMaster · #**202** 06-05-2008, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobharvey

This slays me:

BUT

I gave my little explanation/analogy because I didn't feel the need to go into detail why I believe 9/11 wasn't an inside job. Due to the expected ignorant comments later posted I had to go into more detail. However its still the same, WTC and many other skyscrapers built like it, have all their AC units and other facilities at the very top of the building, so its by far top heavy. When the top has loses its support, not much is going to stop it from coming down. Thats its in a nutshell, would you like to go some more?

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobharvey

WE, zen already said that there were AC's and styrofoam pencils on the top of the two towers....that's why building seven fell! DUH! Oh and btw ZEN if you don't want this thread to be bumped up...then quit posting in it.

I really try not to. Something so stupid should be ignored but however I feel like I am being trolled once again to responding to such nonsense. Guess its in my nature to attempt to combat blind ignorance no matter who spews it out. Only if they listen..

We TaRdED · #**203** 06-05-2008, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenMaster

However its still the same, WTC and many other skyscrapers built like it, have all their AC units and other facilities at the very top of the building, so its by far top heavy. When the top has loses its support, not much is going to stop it from coming down.

Only if they listen..

The AC units really help explain a lot Zen, thanks

How much weight do you think the AC units would add to the building? Why wouldn't they have AC units in the bottom of building too(was it central air?)? Regardless of the weight the AC added, the buildings were engineered to withstand plane crashes and to withstand the weight of the air conditioners.

Don't listen to me, listen to an MIT engineer YouTube - MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1
YouTube - 9/11 Truth: MIT Engineer Jeff King Says WTC Demolished

If someone would only watch this video it would help explain a lot.. YouTube - WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein If someone can watch this vid (its only 24 seconds) and has a head on their shoulders that works, than they can deduce that the the owner of the WTC complex- Larry Silverstein- gave the order to pull WTC7 and then they pulled it and they watched WTC7 fall in its own footprint at near free fall speed. Ohhh ya, and lets not forget to listen to the official report, and be aware that this building feel because of a fire

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

YouTube - Alex Jones Predicts 911
YouTube - If You're an American you should see THIS! for real

Only if you listen.

RON PAUL REVOLUTION

~PEACE~

email468 · #**204** 06-05-2008, 11:58 AM

Is anyone still discussing the Israeli art student incidents prior to the 911 event? Or did that get lost in the shuffle?

bobharvey · #**205** 06-05-2008, 05:45 PM

i think that its just another one of those things that don't have to be explained just ignored. and when brought by genuine truth seekers, they get called nut jobs by people who refuse to believe that anyone on tv would ever lie to them...
I guess if you ignore the fact that wtc7 did collapse, like the 911 commission did then it just goes away.

GrowRebel · #**206** 06-05-2008, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenMaster

Actually, the WTC's design is a little more complex than that picture.

Swedish Structural Engineer: WTC Towers Did Not Collapse from Fire « tobefree
The following is from my book, “Fire in the Skyscraper”

What complete and total bullshit ... this guy is as lame as the kid that post it ... First of all the building started to collapse AFTER the firefighters heard the explosions

No steel framed high-rise building has ever collapsed due to fire - due to the high temperatures that would be required to weaken structural steel past it's critical safety margin - even though very large, very hot, and very long-lasting fires have ravaged many steel-structure high-rise buildings. These buildings are all in use today:

• Caracas, Venezuela, Oct, 2004, 56 story building,
burned for 17 hours over 26 floors
• Los Angeles, May 1988, 1st Interstate Bank, 62 stories,
burned for 3.5 hours over 5 floors
• Philadelphia, Feb, 1991, Meridian Plaza, 38 stories,
burned for 18 hours over 8 floors
• New York, Aug, 1970, New York Plaza, 50 stories,
burned for six hours

Yet this kid and his crackpot scientist believes a building design to withstand a plane crash and fire could free fall in 15 sec only after burning less than an hour ... please ...

It takes thousands of degrees to bend steel like this without buckling. Thermate cutter charges create over 4,500°F. Fires — even with jet fuel — create only 1,700°F maximum.

... so your source fuck up ... he fail to explain why other similar buildings didn't collapse ... and they burned far longer ... and that bullshit about downward motion ... what a and batteries melting ...what a crock of shit ...

check it ...

a building that suppose to have collapse from downward motion would not make cuts like that ... so much for your source...

Folk this is the kind of bullshit you can expect from this kid ... he can't plead ignorance because we have giving several sources of information ... so he can be legally called stupid ...

We TaRdED · #**207** 06-05-2008, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobharvey

I guess if you ignore the fact that wtc7 did collapse, like the 911 commission did then it just goes away.

Are you saying I should ignore the WTC7 collapse? WTF???

If we find out what really happened on the day of sept. 11 of 2001 than it would explain a lot of our present day situation, much better. Just think of how much could be explained if we could get some conclusive facts on who was actually behind 911. We could figure out why our gas prices are so high. We could figure out why our dollar is losing its value and thusly increasing the price of everything else. Maybe thats why G.W.Bush put an immunity(or whatever the exact name was) on himself for his actions while being in office?

RON PAUL REVOLUTION

~PEACE~

We TaRdED · #**208** 06-05-2008, 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowRebel

This is my favorite picture

If someone(Zen) can explain why the middle beam, above the firefighters head, is cut perfectly like that than I will stop believing that 911was an inside job

RON PAUL REVOLUTION

~PEACE~

bobharvey · #**209** 06-05-2008, 11:46 PM

I wasn't saying for you to ignore the fact that WTC7 fell, I'm just saying the 911 commission completely ignored it so a lot of people don't even know about it or don't even care. You have to be blind to IGNORE it.

arabmobster · #**210** 06-06-2008, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobharvey

I wasn't saying for you to ignore the fact that WTC7 fell, I'm just saying the 911 commission completely ignored it so a lot of people don't even know about it or don't even care. You have to be blind to IGNORE it.

911 commision was written to fool everyone