Susan Estrich Blows The Rigged Election Wide Open - Page 3

ccodiane · #21 01-09-2008, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

OMG, the vi monster fessing up to having emotion. The sky must be falling,~LOL~. I wonder whai ilk really means, is it like silk without the "S", I realise I'm pretty smooth....................

Buy a dictionary, or vote for the candidate promising to give them away. There must be at least one lib proposing this, along with the other give aways.

GrowRebel · #22 01-09-2008, 02:22 PM

NH debacle: BBC wants to hear from you NOW!

ABC News: 'It is simply unprecedented for so many polls to have been so wrong. We need to know why'

... anyone that believes these election are legit ... and the will of the people is being heard is a fool ... plane and simple ...

ccodiane · #23 01-09-2008, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowRebel

NH debacle: BBC wants to hear from you NOW!

ABC News: 'It is simply unprecedented for so many polls to have been so wrong. We need to know why'

... anyone that believes these election are legit ... and the will of the people is being heard is a fool ... plane and simple ...

Unless the Democrats win!!!

GrowRebel · #24 01-09-2008, 02:50 PM

You just don't get it do you? ... and you never will ...

I found some reports of fraud on the dems side as well ... check it out ...

Diebold favors Hillary, hand count for Obama

NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama

ccodiane · #25 01-09-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowRebel

You just don't get it do you? ... and you never will ...

I found some reports of fraud on the dems side as well ... check it out ...

Diebold favors Hillary, hand count for Obama

NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama

It will never be a news story, period. It will be gone as soon as they find something to bury it, anything.

ViRedd · #26 01-09-2008, 03:04 PM

OK, GW ...

Giving you the benefit of the doubt ... what should we do about it? Please be specific ... thanks.

Vi

GrowRebel · #27 01-09-2008, 03:24 PM

My only solution right now is to vote ... they spend time and money suppressing the vote, large turnout may help expose the fraud more easily ...

More updates ...

FLASHBACK VIDEO: Peter King "We'll take care of the counting."

New Hampshire Primary - ALL Diebold, ALL the Time
“…The actual computer voting machines were introduced on a grand scale in New Hampshire’s 1988 primary. The results were predictable – former CIA director George H. W. Bush won a huge upset over Dole, …” “…George H.W. Bush was trailing Dole by eight points in the last Gallup poll before the New Hampshire primary. Bush won by nine points…”

Will Paul have a recount?
Vote Recount money bomb $67,000 - VOTE FRAUD CONFIRMED

mockingbird131313 · #28 01-09-2008, 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrowRebel

Well your so friggin smart ... you tell us what she meant by that ...

Since you ask nice, I will tell you what she meant by the remark.

The president of CBS said that news reporters could control what you think. How, so? He said it was simple done by what stories THEY decide to run with and how they present them. He made his remarks in 1959 regarding the election of Eisenhower.

News department still have the same power today, in controlling the masses.
</IMG>

mockingbird131313 · #29 01-09-2008, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clekstro

Why am I not surprised that there is little substance to this conversation?

Someone mentions vote fraud, and it's ignored completely. "Elephant"itus has infiltrated Vi's brain and swollen shut all rational brain centers. This is not an issue about winning; the issue is whether or not we can call ourselves a democracy anymore. If your vote doesn't count, you haven't voted at all.

That is the issue that every American should care about.

Follow the links and learn a little bit, Vi.

But one more bit: I think you're right, now, about liberals. As educated as they are about foreign policy and the sins of this nation, their idea of federalism is to force their agenda through Washington through their own strong man. It isn't constitutional. It isn't moral. It's just a fact of life (that state governments are relatively unimportant) that everyone of partisan persuasion seems keen on exploiting instead of ending.

That's why I love Ron Paul.
Empower yourself instead of a politician: that is the message of his campaign...
What a kooky thought, indeed.

I believe what I see. Not what some people suspect might have happened. I live in a state where we used punch ballots all my adult life and they worked great. But, we pissed and moaned over "hanging chads" for weeks. Now the simple, cheap, durable, punch cards have been replaced with big shiney electronic machines.

I will start to trust in the reliability of electronic voting machines when my TV reception improves.

GrowRebel · #30 01-10-2008, 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mockingbird131313

Since you ask nice, I will tell you what she meant by the remark.

The president of CBS said that news reporters could control what you think. How, so? He said it was simple done by what stories THEY decide to run with and how they present them. He made his remarks in 1959 regarding the election of Eisenhower.

News department still have the same power today, in controlling the masses.
</IMG>

No ... she meant they were going to use election fraud and "fix" the election so Paul wouldn't win ... the evidence is clear ... there is fraud on both sides of the isle.

Not that using the media to control the masses isn't part of it ... but the fact that ballots are counted by corporations that have an interest in continuing the war in secret is a clear indication we are not choosing our reps...