
04-25-2008, 03:15 PM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | Hey, hey! I'm back in beautiful color once again ... with smilies ... ... had to get a router ... it did the job!
Now back to the thread ... I'm for getting corporation out of the election process ... totally out ... paper ballots ... hand count by civil servants ...
... the way things are now we have to take the word of the people who count our votes in secret who also has a vested interest in who gets in office ... 
... god how I missed the little puke ... good to have you back my friend ...  | 
04-25-2008, 03:27 PM
|  | Super Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 7,817
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by mockingbird131313 Was it not you liberals who wanted the new style voting machines because the old punch card system, which was used for 30 years in my district, was purportedly prone to fraud?
I still think we fixed something that was NOT broken. At great expense I might add. | Uhhh, it wasn't me. I like the old way of marking ballots with an X in the box. Kind of hard to fuck that up. Put all the players on a list and you mark the ones you want, how simple is that. Hell, I'll even volunteer to count the ballots
__________________ Amendment IV, search and seizure rights. Read about them before they're gone. | 
04-25-2008, 04:48 PM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | News Update ... | | This just in ... Exclusive: PA's Primary Results Website Listed Obama Three Times, With Three Differing Totals on Election NightThe Dept. of State's Director of the Office of Communications and Press, Leslie Amorós, confirmed the Election Night problem, but was unable to explain why it occurred. She told Sircely, during the short phone call, that she'd be happy to try and get an explanation from their technical staff. She went on to say, however, that whatever caused the anomaly, it didn't effect the outcome of the reported results.
Tis claim that any observed anomalies do not effect the final outcome is nonsense, because the moment you see an anomaly, you must assume there may be more anomalies that were NOT seen; anomalies impossible to find because the current elections systems do not have audit trails. Therefore, it is impossible to justify the statement that the final outcome is not effected and can be trusted. MR It's like I said before people ... we are not choosing anyone ... the fix is in! | 
04-25-2008, 05:05 PM
| | Able To Roll A Joint Able to roll a joint | | Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 85
| | Youtube already took it down, how interesting
I watched the other Susan Estrich videos, especially the Oreilly video.... GIRL POWER
hah dumb box | 
04-26-2008, 10:49 AM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | Yeah ... I can imagine they wouldn't want something like that on Youtube ... but rest assured ... it's out there still ... | 
05-03-2008, 01:35 PM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | More election fraud news ... | | Did the US Supreme Court deliver the Indiana Primary to Hillary Clinton? Imagine Hillary Clinton's luck. When she needed to win a primary in New Hampshire, the machines glitched up, and she emerged with an unexpected margin of victory. Whether it was due to electronic voting breakdowns is not clear. But there was never a a full recount or a thorough investigation of the serious problems that plagued the vote count in that state. When she needed a victory in Ohio, Republican voters -- urged on by Rush Limbaugh -- crossed over in droves and helped give her one. Cross-over voting may also have been a factor in her critical victory in Pennsylvania. There were also numerous instances of computer tabulation glitches in the Pennsylvania secretary of state's office. Now the Indiana primary looms ahead. Less than a week prior, the US Supreme Court has delivered a devastating decision on voter ID that could again make a big difference in Clinton's favor. | 
05-30-2008, 02:18 PM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | Professor Miller was on Mike Malloy last night ... he talked about how the GOP is planning to steal this election if there is a ten point difference ... if they can't Miller feels that they will do another 911 and install marshal law and stop the changing of office ... we shall see ... Mark Crispin Miller Professor and author Mark Crispin Miller is here to discuss his latest book Loser Take All: Election Fraud and The Subversion of Democracy, 2000 - 2008, a subject about which we cannot be too vigilant as we near November in what is arguably the most critical national election in recent history. Loser Take Allis an anthology by writers that should be very familiar to you: Larisa Alexandrova, Brad Friedman and Robert Kennedy, Jr. among others. From Amazon:Loser Taker All: Election Fraud and The Subversion of Democracy, 2000-2008is an indispensable anthology of writings covering the vast election fraud that has been perpetrated by the GOP—with the Democratic Party’s acquiescence—since 2000. Among the subjects treated here are: the myth of George Bush’s victory in Florida in 2000, and FOX News’s key role in propagating it; Senator Max Cleland’s dubious defeat in Georgia in 2002; Bush’s “re-election” in 2004, including evidence of systematic fraud outside of Ohio; startling evidence of fraud committed in the 2006 midterm elections, which the Democrats appear to have won by a far larger margin than officially reported; and, crucially, evidence that the Republicans will attempt to steal the presidential election in 2008.
| 
05-30-2008, 02:36 PM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | For those of you that are interested in our voting rights check out the conversation with Miller and the readers at C&L .... | 
05-30-2008, 06:56 PM
|  | Stoner Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,025
| | Here is part 2 of the video with Miller ... How many of you think the illegitimate bush regime would use martial law if McSame doesn't steal the election .... Endgame: Bush & Cheney's desperate measures PT. 2 I think it's very interesting the evidence that shows the dems actually won 50 seat in 2006 ... election fraud kept them from having a veto proof congress ...  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | Come Check out a new Poker Forum for the online poker community
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37 PM. |