Talk of nuclear terrorists...Lord who will save us from Obama?

Actually it would be WW4. WW3 was the cold war and includes the Korean war, Vietnam, and a totally psycho bluffing game mixed with a spending race to break each others piggy banks. The USA won that one.

hmmm, maybe that's how tis viewed in your part of world but not heard the cold war described as a world war, and I don't think it merits that title...but semantics, eh? Point is, we don't want another one...unless you're part of the US ruling class, in which case seems almost like the final goal of international policy is capital w War...

Its all about keeping the masses in fear so they dont start taking a deeper look at our real problems. Problems like education and employment. America is run by big business. If it doesnt make someone rich it doesnt happen here.

Yah...that's why...

Don't like business? drop out of society.

Oh brother....

Don't like other people's opinions? Drop outta my threads....

or clearly express you own OPINIONS without resorting to personal attacks.

Want an opinion on the obvious? Fine by me....

Let's reverse it and see if you can think ur way past. K?

If a terrorist organization (fill in ur fav!!) has an opportunity to gain access to a nuke.... think they would go for it... or not?

Hmmm?

Originally Posted by CrackerJax

Want an opinion on the obvious? Fine by me....

Let's reverse it and see if you can think ur way past. K?

Hmmm?

The attitude you express here is not conducive to an exchange of ideas and opinions, and is therefore not useful to anyone...except for you...makes you fell less small, goes some way to filling the void in your inflated ego, perhaps? I would rather talk about political issues than have to give a shit about your muddled little psyche.

Originally Posted by CrackerJax

If a terrorist organization (fill in ur fav!!) has an opportunity to gain access to a nuke.... think they would go for it... or not?

Most wouldn't, actually, no. Nuclear weapons are not user friendly, not easy to store or move, they require a lot of knowlege to obtain and to be useful, and, most importantly, using them would cause universal condemnation of whichever group was responsible for their use.

Most 'terrorists' see themselves as freedom fighters, fighting for a cause they believe has moral and political worth. Usually they want sympathy for their cause and methods, they're not asocial or antisocial groups hell-bent on mass destruction.

CrackerJax, you have nothing useful to say and seem intent on expressing youself as unpleasantly as possible, so you're the only member on my ignore list. Take your foolishness elsewhere.

In the fair exchange of ideas.... it is a very tenable approach to be able to reverse the thinking to make sure the equation is balanced. In case you didn't know.... k?

================================================== =========

okay...you answered the question. You think "most" terrorist org's would NOT accept a nuke. Okay... I'm glad you are comfortable with that. Obama is not however. "Most" is unacceptable.