New Global warming puzzle: Is it the sun? - Page 3

Dankdude · #21 11-30-2006, 07:16 AM

bigballin007, I don't believe that at all, and it is an arrogant hypothesis which raises the importance of man.
one Volcanic eruption can put out more greenhouse gasses than man could have cause in 10,000 years. and yet the earth seems to recover after each volcanic eruption. Like I said before, I believe that this is nothing but a 1500 year cycle and there is core samples to support this hypothesis.

bigballin007 · #22 11-30-2006, 07:25 AM

oh well Dank lets blame the huge growing ozone hole on a volcano. Hello wake the fuck up when was the last major eruption that has increased the size of the hole in the ozone layer. If you are ignorant enough to believe your actions pose no risk to my childrens future as well as man kind then you deserve a bullet in the head cause your an idiot!!!!

Dankdude · #23 11-30-2006, 07:32 AM

Funny when most of what the scientist their hypothesis is extreamly flawed.. Did you even read any of the links I provided?

bigballin007 · #24 11-30-2006, 07:36 AM

You also must be from a small town cause if you have ever been to a major city and look at the air (smog) and still tell me that pollution does nothing to impact our earth then you must be blind as well. Can you eat as much fish as you want? No not unless you want mercury poisoning! Have you ever looked at a really old tree when it is cut? Look at the rings you will see that 20 years ago the rings were dense and very thick and now with all the pollution they grow less than a third the density they did 20 years ago. Why smart guy? I can tell you it's not because the trees changed genetics on their own! Humans have had a greater impact on the world than people like you want to admitt cause you want to continue thinking that you do not hurt the earth but you are wrong. Time will prove this and you can consider yourself warned!!!!

Wavels · #25 11-30-2006, 07:43 AM

Dank, I find myself in total agreement with all you have posted in this thread.

bigball, according to your first post you state that man is causing global warming, you go on to say that global warming occurred 250 million years ago……where were the people who caused warming that long ago?

IMO, global warming belief is akin to a religion…..it takes more than a smidgeon of faith in order to believe in this wacky notion.

Dankdude · #26 11-30-2006, 07:47 AM

No Actually I lived in LA for 30 years.... How come it is when environmentalist are challenged they get irate instead of discussing things rationally?

BTW, I'm a conservationist, there is a big difference between the two.
Environmentalism is a political movement that tries to control the people where as a conservationist uses common sense.

Look I do not like clear cutting and a there are a lot of environmental sacred cows that are correct. But don't get irate because I dared challenge the science that environmentalist base their political movement on.

bigballin007 · #27 11-30-2006, 07:50 AM

The first global warming was caused by a combimation of the poles reversing and the fact that when the poles reversed the earth was bombarded by huge metiroites causing the earth to rapidly change.

Dankdude · #28 11-30-2006, 07:54 AM

There is core sample evidence that global warming occurs every 1500 years on average.

bigballin007 · #29 11-30-2006, 08:05 AM

religion....... I dont believe in heaven or hell or god for that matter as evolution has disproven the notion that the earth was created in seven days as the idiots who belive this greatest lie ever told are fools. Religion is all about goverment control! This discusion does make me irate because if you just open your eyes and look at the changes that have just happened while you have been alive. I know that I being 39 have seen alot of changes that were once concidered to be an impossible yet they continue to defiy sceince and nature. it is people like you that will cause the earth to be uninhabbitable. I feel sorry for you and your followers.

medicineman · #30 11-30-2006, 08:30 AM

The people foisting false science "facts", are not the environmentalists, but rather the energy companies. Big oil pays big bucks to put out this bullshit. Just take for example one little thing, an automobile engine. The modern auto-engine runs at 220 Degrees, the exhaust at the manifold runs around 700 degrees, now take that times, what, a billion automobiles, think thats not contributing and thats just heat. Hell all the cigarette smokers contribute a few thousands of a degree, especially in china. Now as for the Ozone, thats a no brainer, the polution from auto exhaust NOX, hydrocarbons and mostly Carbon Monoxide has contributed to that decline, only a complete Idiot or an oil company employee would dispute that. My question is this: why is anyone trying to debunk the facts of human interferance in the climatology of the earth? 4+ billion human bodies at 98.6 degrees must have a minute influence, let alone all the coal fired boilers and nuclear and natural gas fired boilers Ect. ad finitum, steel mills with cauldrons of molten metal at 1800 degrees+ etc. Someone can't honestly say that man is no contributer unless they are either, pick one: Blind deaf and dumb, stupid, or work for an energy company. Common sense should dictate the facts, but for some reason, I really don't understand, these otherwise bright people become dimwitted when this subject is trotted out....... Wake up, It's real, now lets try and figure out a solution before ViRedds house is under 6 ft. of water!