So 3,777 Soldier Dead Eh? Try 73,000

GrowRebel · #1 09-24-2007, 06:28 PM

What did I tell ya folks! That 3700 killed in Iraq is BULLSHIT ... and most of you continue to fall for it.
The number is 73,864 DEAD
YOU CAN NO LONGER DENY IT! MORE KILLED THAN IN VIETNAM!
Department of Veterans Affairs Reports 73 Thousand U.S. Gulf War Deaths
How come the government numbers of 3,777 as of 9/7/7 are so low? The answer is simple, the government does not want the 73,000 dead to be compared to the 55,000 U.S. soldiers killed in Vietnam Iraq = Vietnam. What the government is doing is only counting the soldiers that die in action before they can get them into a helicopter or ambulance. Any soldier who is shot but they get into a helicopter before he dies is not counted.

Any one that backs this illegal war is a fool.

Right from the horse's mouth ... Page 6

Chrisuperfly · #2 09-26-2007, 07:09 AM

Al Jubayl and Khamisiyah....hmmmm....according to most of you clown Iraq didnt have weapons of mass destruction to include chemical weapons. So according to you assholes 3,216 soldiers died of sand inhalation?

That is one point I'll make about this document seeing as how I don't think you actually read past page 6 of section 2, which is probably where some conspiracy theory website told you to look so thats the only page you went to. First of all the figure that you threw out 73,846 deaths as it is on page 6 of section 2 COVERS ALL VETERAN DEATHS AND DOESNT CATEGORIZE THEM. IT EVEN SAYS ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE DOCUMENT "THE USE OF THESE DATA TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS REGARDING MORTALITY RATES WILL RESULT IN INACCURATE CONCLUSIONS". Before you get another genius notion of posting information try reading it first or at least knowing a little about what it is your posting before you post it.

7xstall · #3 09-26-2007, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisuperfly

Al Jubayl and Khamisiyah....hmmmm....according to most of you clown Iraq didnt have weapons of mass destruction to include chemical weapons. So according to you assholes 3,216 soldiers died of sand inhalation?

That is one point I'll make about this document seeing as how I don't think you actually read past page 6 of section 2, which is probably where some conspiracy theory website told you to look so thats the only page you went to. First of all the figure that you threw out 73,846 deaths as it is on page 6 of section 2 COVERS ALL VETERAN DEATHS AND DOESNT CATEGORIZE THEM. IT EVEN SAYS ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE DOCUMENT "THE USE OF THESE DATA TO DRAW CONCLUSIONS REGARDING MORTALITY RATES WILL RESULT IN INACCURATE CONCLUSIONS". Before you get another genius notion of posting information try reading it first or at least knowing a little about what it is your posting before you post it.

that's what i call a smack down. a damn good one too!

.

Chrisuperfly · #4 09-26-2007, 08:44 AM

Here I'll help ya out

http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personne...wot_reason.pdf

And thats the bottom line.

Oh yeah and that web article you got this from I don't think that asshole knew what he was reading either. Who the Fuck is Clive Boustred and where do I get ahold of the shit he is smoking.

medicineman · #5 09-26-2007, 09:31 AM

according to most of you clown Iraq didnt have weapons of mass destruction to include chemical weapons. So according to you assholes 3,216 soldiers died of sand inhalation?
Try exposure to depleted Uranium ordinance. That has caused over a million Iraqi deaths, mostly children. The consequences of exposure to our own troops lives on in the birth defects and cancers now beginning to show up in post war soldiers, Hey, maybe your kids will be born with some defects, who really knows. They lied about agent orange, what makes you think they won't lie about depleted uranium? They lied about exposure to fallout to all those poor people in Utah that got cancer from the A-bomb testing in Nevada. Hey, wake-up, our government lies, thats what they do best. There are over a million tons of depleted uraniun ordinance in Iraq lying all over the place. The dust in the air is enough to give you a good dose of cancer, so maybe you ought to get a check-up

Chrisuperfly · #6 09-26-2007, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

according to most of you clown Iraq didnt have weapons of mass destruction to include chemical weapons. So according to you assholes 3,216 soldiers died of sand inhalation?
Try exposure to depleted Uranium ordinance. That has caused over a million Iraqi deaths, mostly children. The consequences of exposure to our own troops lives on in the birth defects and cancers now beginning to show up in post war soldiers, Hey, maybe your kids will be born with some defects, who really knows. They lied about agent orange, what makes you think they won't lie about depleted uranium? They lied about exposure to fallout to all those poor people in Utah that got cancer from the A-bomb testing in Nevada. Hey, wake-up, our government lies, thats what they do best. There are over a million tons of depleted uraniun ordinance in Iraq lying all over the place. The dust in the air is enough to give you a good dose of cancer, so maybe you ought to get a check-up

And I quote: (Section 3 Page 15)

Al Jubayl is a subset of the Conflict category. On or about January 19, 1991, service members serving in
and around Al Jubayl, Saudi Arabia reported an incident involving a “loud noise,” “bright flash,” and
possible “Iraqi chemical warfare agent attack.” There are 1,334 service members identified by the DoD
as having served in and around the port city of Al Jubayl on January 19, 1991. DoD concludes that the
chemical attack was “unlikely.” Additional information regarding events at or near Al Jubayl can be

viewed at DoD’s web site: Welcome to the FHP&R Website!

And (Section 3 Page 19):

Khamisiyah is a subset of the Conflict category. The DoD identified 145,472 service members as
having served in units in the hazard areas in and around the Khamisiyah Ammunition Supply Point, Iraq
at the time of the demolition of chemical warfare munitions. On March 4, 1991, and on March 10, 1991,
the U.S. military destroyed Iraqi “chemical warfare agent rockets,” possibly exposing U.S. service
members to low levels of chemical warfare agents. Based on the most recent analysis of the Khamisiyah
events, the DoD believes 101,768 service members were possibly exposed to low-level chemical
warfare agents. Additional information about the current Khamisiyah analysis can be viewed at DoD’s

web site: Case Narrative Khamisiyah Final Report.

I am just using the information presented in the document. Says nothing about depleted Uranium. I know the government lies, won't deny that one bit. But a document is being quoted and used as evidence in some cocka-mamey article by some idiot that shouldn't be writing aricles like this. (yeah I said cocka mamey) And I am as fit as a fiddle.

Also, the UN findings and inspections on those sites are very interesting. Check out the links.

medicineman · #7 09-26-2007, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chrisuperfly

And I quote: (Section 3 Page 15)

Al Jubayl is a subset of the Conflict category. On or about January 19, 1991, service members serving in
and around Al Jubayl, Saudi Arabia reported an incident involving a “loud noise,” “bright flash,” and
possible “Iraqi chemical warfare agent attack.” There are 1,334 service members identified by the DoD
as having served in and around the port city of Al Jubayl on January 19, 1991. DoD concludes that the
chemical attack was “unlikely.” Additional information regarding events at or near Al Jubayl can be

viewed at DoD’s web site: Welcome to the FHP&R Website!

And (Section 3 Page 19):

Khamisiyah is a subset of the Conflict category. The DoD identified 145,472 service members as
having served in units in the hazard areas in and around the Khamisiyah Ammunition Supply Point, Iraq
at the time of the demolition of chemical warfare munitions. On March 4, 1991, and on March 10, 1991,
the U.S. military destroyed Iraqi “chemical warfare agent rockets,” possibly exposing U.S. service
members to low levels of chemical warfare agents. Based on the most recent analysis of the Khamisiyah
events, the DoD believes 101,768 service members were possibly exposed to low-level chemical
warfare agents. Additional information about the current Khamisiyah analysis can be viewed at DoD’s

web site: Case Narrative Khamisiyah Final Report.

I am just using the information presented in the document. Says nothing about depleted Uranium. I know the government lies, won't deny that one bit. But a document is being quoted and used as evidence in some cocka-mamey article by some idiot that shouldn't be writing aricles like this. (yeah I said cocka mamey) And I am as fit as a fiddle.

Also, the UN findings and inspections on those sites are very interesting. Check out the links.

Dude, If you were in Iraq, get frequent medical check-ups, because this depleted uranium stuff is no Joke.

Forum	Shop	Market		Seeds	FAQ	Tools
SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS				Looking for Legal Marijuana look no further!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Hip Hop is dead	th3col0urBlu3Gat0rade	Music	42	09-05-2007 04:23 PM
it's dead	poohter	Newbie Central	11	09-03-2007 01:29 PM
I just lost my best soldier.	fdd2blk	Toke N Talk	7	05-20-2007 10:55 PM
Dead Man ...	ViRedd	Politics	18	01-04-2007 10:45 AM
Dead	verdero	Indoor Growing	0	12-25-2006 04:59 AM

User Name		Remember Me?
Password

SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS

Looking for Legal Marijuana look no further!

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Posting Rules