Climate Change Treaty A Precursor To Global Government?
By Dr. Chuck Baldwin
Posted by Justine

Writing for World Net Daily, Dr. Jerome Corsi states, "A former science
adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says the real purpose of
the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is
to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a
one-world government."

Corsi quotes Lord Christopher Monckton as telling a Minnesota Free Market
Institute audience at Bethel University in St. Paul, "Your president will
sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because they think
they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the
European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it."

Corsi quotes Monckton as also saying, "I read that treaty and what it says
is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word
'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new
entity."

See Corsi's column at:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113219

To see a YouTube video segment of Lord Monckton's address go to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40

Plus, here is a later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton, in which he
further expands his thoughts:

http://tinyurl.com/foxbusiness-monckton

Did Lord Monckton exaggerate?

My research of the Climate Change document that Monckton references found
the following: it is a 181-page working document that does not mention the
words "ballot," "elected official," or "vote" anywhere in it. In my opinion,
Lord Monckton did not exaggerate; if anything, he may have understated the
situation. The document does indeed appear to be the institutional framework
for an unelected supreme communist-style world government.

By signing this document, the United States (and other industrial nations)
will forever take responsibility for the ills of backwards and third world
countries. And, according to Lord Monckton, this would include China and
India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice:

Page 6, "PP.15 Further acknowledging that developed countries have a
historical responsibility for their disproportionate contribution to the
causes and consequences of climate change, reflecting their disproportionate
historical use of a shared global carbon space since 1850 as well as their
proposed continuing disproportional use of the remaining global carbon space
. . . Warming of the climate system, as a consequence of human activity, is
unequivocal."

Page 38, "28. The adverse effects of climate change and response measures,
due to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries,
constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties
(particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with
low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods,
drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile
mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing strategies to
address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable development and a
threat to achieving the United Nations Millennium Development Goals."

Page 122, "17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDC's economy and also
compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity . . ."

"(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably
compensated for environmental, social and economic losses . . ."

By signing and being party to this document, we are accepting legal
financial responsibility to support non-developed countries FOREVER.

Page 27, "(b) Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and communities,
[or] All vulnerable groups whose adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups
requiring special protection . . ."

Page 43, "41. (a) Assessed contributions of at least 0.7% of annual GDP of
developed country Parties." These funds will go directly to governments and
"community organizations."

Page 39, "33. [The financial burden] must be at least USD 67 billion (in the
range of USD 70-140 billion) per year."

The commitments of the developed countries are "economy wide." Page 58, "7.
(a) Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are legally binding
economy wide and absolute quantified emission reduction commitments."

"(b) Mitigation actions by developing countries are VOLUNTARY . . ."
(Emphasis added.)

The system appears to be loaded to ensure that the world body overseeing
this document is granted total control for the enforcement of the
requirements of this document throughout all developed countries. Penalties
for non-compliance by developed countries are scattered throughout the
document.

It appears that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican or
Democratic) could not do through the constitutional legislative process,
they are attempting to do through international treaty. Therefore, it is my
studied opinion that Lord Monckton's assessment that this upcoming Climate
Change Convention in Copenhagen is a "pretext" for the establishment of one
world government is "spot-on."

It does seem to be getting clearer and clearer that if the elected civil
magistrates in Washington, D.C., do not quickly grow some backbone and
develop some sagacity as to the direction these globalists are taking our
country, resistance will be forced (in one way or another) upon the States
and the People, because it is not possible for the policies and financial
burden that are--and will be--levied upon the backs of the American people
to be sustained without the surrender of independence, the abridgment of
constitutional government, and the loss of liberty.

__________________
To Know is NOT to Understand- To Understand is to Know Why. J. Plumlee

I kind of wish a huge armed mob would march on Washington and arrest our leaders for treason/sedition.

When it's too late then the sheeple will wake up. But rest assured that none of those guilty of treason or sedition will ever be charged or hung for their crimes.
j

__________________
To Know is NOT to Understand- To Understand is to Know Why. J. Plumlee

I have been seeing a lot about this recently and it just disturbs me.......I don't know what else to say.

__________________
343 You are not forgotten

That's what mussolini said.

__________________
Liberals are people that will believe anything twice.

I was speaking in reference to our current 'judicial system' (cash register courts and legislating 'law' from the bench.

I do remember this....
The Romanian Revolution of 1989 was a week-long series of increasingly violent riots and fighting in late December 1989 that overthrew the Government of Nicolae Ceauşescu. After a trial, Ceauşescu and his wife Elena were executed. Romania was the only Eastern Bloc country to overthrow its government violently and to execute its leaders.

That may happen here one day. I see nothing good coming down the wire- the consequences of conduct regarding what our public servants and NGO's /Banks have done to us.
But will Obama sign this legal theft from we, the people?
He says he won't - which means he will.

How much more can we, the people, take???

__________________
To Know is NOT to Understand- To Understand is to Know Why. J. Plumlee

One of the problems we have with the constitution and laws in general is that they are open to interpretation. As long as people still have jobs, places to live, food to eat and stuff to consume they won't do a thing. The people of our great country have become complacent and ignorant. And if you start talking about conspiracies and the like most people simply write you off as a whack job. This is why we continue to have wars and governments doing incredibly irresponsible things. People always think it won't happen here. All governments eventually fail.

__________________
343 You are not forgotten

All true. But our Constitution- if we, the people, were to have done our part (binding our public servants down with the chains of the Constitution) would not be in the current mess we are in.

Yes, people have been apathetic but they are waking up like never before.
A clear line is developing in this country- the true patriot (one with the facts that create knowledge and action) and pseudo - fake- patriot who who trusts 'feelings' more than fact and do nothing but bitch about how fact based information is presented.

They refuse to judge a matter rightly. They are continually unjust judges of a matter.

One thing I've noticed about pseudo patriots- they never admit when they are wrong. It's never, ever, their fault. The do nothing but place blame at the feet of those who were right or correct to begin with.

They are constitutionally unwilling to speak the truth or honor truth for truth sake.

The dems blame Bush for the TARP bail-out but it was the dems who presented it and only 6 repubs (elephants) signed off on it. The rest were all dems (Jackasses) ; so how is Bush to blame for it???
What of unjust judges of a matter! What a bunch of Jackasses.

Then you have Obama saying he's a leader- yet he follows in the footsteps of Bush! Working the printing presses over time to spent more in his administration than all the presidents combined.

But the repubs are the bad guys!

Look at who was behind Fanny and Freddie and why. Again- look at the facts! Did the dems say 'woops, we ripped our shorts on that one... we need to repair this now!' Nope.

They did what the banks wanted them to do... let it collapse so we can come in and pick-up and re-sell the pieces.

Whatever... We need to liquidate their ass-etts. We need a truthful currency system and object if we are to weed out the toxic people currently infesting Washington Deceit.

__________________
To Know is NOT to Understand- To Understand is to Know Why. J. Plumlee

Both parties are guilty of harming our country and so too are all the Americans that have been or who are currently apathetic.

__________________
To Know is NOT to Understand- To Understand is to Know Why. J. Plumlee

mussolini never existed....unless you believe the bible, but its fake. oh wait, that was a different thread. just wait till they sign this law. then watch your bank accounts evaporate. at least it wont hurt the poor (sarcasm)