ohh no!!!!!!!!!!!
I mean... is it safe??? or can people do evil things to my computer while doing it???

__________________
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...oing-kilo.html

i've watched like half the movie so far but i gotta say there are some glaring inconstancies in their theories.
exmple:
no plane debris at the pentagon or shanksville, PA.
-they claim it's a false attack site and the gov is duping us all but they fail to explain why there is no plane wreckage at the world trade tower sites.
-they also compare the "planes crash sites" in shanksville and the pentagon to a plane crash in nigeria to which they don't give a date or reference, but i can guarantee you that the plane in nigeria wasn't spearheaded into the ground.
(this is the last biggie as far as i've watched)
-they claim that the only why the two towers could have fallen, they claim at a rate of 10 floors per second, is via explosives. HOW CAN THEY TELL? there is a wall of dust that spans at least 15-20 floors, and the dust is falling at free fall speed. How can they assume the floors are falling in pace with the dust? That's my rant for now

__________________
come join us on our island.

ok i have one more set of complaints about their theories

they point out the steel I beams where cut at an angle and that modern demonlitionists use that technique but i ask you....how did they get access to the bare I beam? the only way possible is by ripping out some of the walls to get at the bare structure. if they did why didn't anybody notice people ripping out the walls?

they also point out the burning temp of jet fuel to be about 1500F well that's misleading. that is the running temp inside aircraft engines but if you add a lot more (say the entire supply of a long distance flight), then the temp will go way up.

__________________
come join us on our island.

-they claim it's a false attack site and the gov is duping us all but they fail to explain why there is no plane wreckage at the world trade tower sites.

they are saying that planes didn't even hit the towers???

I up unill recently believed all people who believed any 911 conspiracies must be an absolute retard. I took ofence to people thinking it was a conpiracy. I live in NYC and saw the towers fall. it is somthing I will never forget. the towers were quite visible through the smoke... until they were almost completly down.
the videos from a distance are onse that show it more clearly... rather than close up because of like you said all the smoke...
using the recording they can see how fast the building was falling...
i now too think it is a conspiracy... and that really really upsets me
fucking bastards

__________________
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...oing-kilo.html

the to "sites" i was referring to were the crashes at the pentagon and shanksville, PA. the conspiracy theorists are saying that these two crashes were fabricated and their proof is the lack of wreckage.

my question is: with all the video evidence of the planes hitting the world trade centers, where is the wreckage? I'm not saying that this didn't happen. I AM saying that the same thing that happened at the WTC, happened at the Pentagon and PA. The force of impact obliterated the planes in to smaller chunks and the massive fires that followed due to the tons of jet fuel, melted the rest. keeping in mind that commercial airliners are made of mostly aluminum, which has a realities low melting point. So the lack of debris is not evidence of conspiracy.

and for a while they were saying that the towers 1, 2, and 7 came down due to planted demolition explosives.

having not been at nyc at the time i can't say what it looked like to the naked eye but having seen the video of the incidents, i can say that in these videos you can't actually see where the building is collapsing. all you can actually see is a mass of debris and dust falling. so to say that the building is collapsing at a free fall rate is a load of crap.

i still think that conspiracy theorists are moronic.

__________________
come join us on our island.

but not retarted... that is a step...
I live in brooklyn. not manhatan. and from where I was I had a perfect view of them falling... all you could see was them faling fast as shit... and I was also in school on the top floor so that helped alittle too... but theres tons of footage from people in even taler building recording it and you can see them falling the whole way down pretty much... and using math and paunsing each fram and crazy stuff I have no idea about they can get a pretty good idea of how fast it was falling.
I see what your saying about the planes not being there... but with the WTC there was blocks and blocks and blocks and tons of tons of tons of debrise
while at the pentagon and that other asshole place there was just basicaly holes... with little debrise.
look at videos and pictures of other plane crazhes... the diferences are astonishing.

__________________
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...oing-kilo.html

Apparently I already had torrent cuz it played no problemo, if you have to download it I highly recommend it, it will be the most informative hour and 56 minutes of your life. it opens the eyes to the real world around us, what we were born into, the conspiracies are real people...history doesnt lie, it merely repeats itself. watch it okay.
peace be to all my ganja brothers and sisters. Amen.

i found it. this is a short article about that plane crash. but the key thing to note is this

The Blotter: Close Call in Abuja: Eyewitness to Tragedy

the plane they're comparing it to is a 737 which is much smaller than the 757 (and therefore much less fuel) but also it crashed shortly after take off. which means it was going relatively slow as compared to the 757 taking a nose dive from cruising altitude(which is about 35000ft).

what this all means is that the plane in nigieria (737) leave much bigger chunks because it didn't take even a comparable amount force that the 757 took.

so yeah they were both plane crashes but they were comparing apples and oranges.

__________________
come join us on our island.

forget about the plane they are comparing it to... look at other plane crashes... most of them are wayy more destructive and alot more shit left over.

__________________
http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...oing-kilo.html

ok lets look at other plane crashes:

this is folker 28 that hit the side of a mountain:
Untitled Document
a bunch of little chunks, very similar to the crash in shanksville

a Tupolev TU-154M(russian airliner) that crashed about 20min after take off. so high but not quite cruising alt yet.
Untitled Document
with the except of the tail, notice the lack of large pieces debris?

a boeing 737 crashing seconds after take off
Untitled Document
notice the mountains of debris?

the point is the lower the impact the larger the chunks; the higher the impact the smaller the chunks. so the lack of debris at the pentagon and shanksville not that dissimilar to other plane crashes. To claim that those two crashes where hoaxes by the gov, when a lot of real people died on those flights, I find rather disgusting.

__________________
come join us on our island.