Thanks Luciferhorus at www.davidicke.com for this repeat vid!



The bright spot on the building prior to impact reminds one of the bright spots on the WTC Towers before the planes struck, which could have been power lasers that were focused to ensure the jet fuel ignited upon impact,

Some ppl say there was a "pod" under the plane that hit the South Tower, I have never been so sure, however the theory that nozzles were spraying jet fuel seemed about right. It still does not explain the bright spot on the P'gon, unless maybe the cruiser had a device that homed in on the laser spot!

Ask yourselves if it resembles the cruiser pictured below, and whether the nose cone highlighted in the small pic, which is the first frame in the only officially released footage of the Pentagon strike..



Resembles both ..I reckon it does.

You know someone is going to come and attack the source right?

__________________
It is far easier to ignorantly control others than it is to wisely control yourself.

I wouldn't attack the source ... but I would question the source of the source. Who took the picture? Why hasn't it surfaced before this? How can we be sure it isn't a Photo Shop effort?

__________________
Liberals are people that will believe anything twice.

The source is a plane or helocopter camara is moving.
I would imagine that it would be military given the situation that day.
Within' minutes of the attack the FBI were gathering up all footage.
No way this would have leaked, IMO.
I'll bet its fake disinfo.
David Icke thinks George Bush
is a lizard for Christ sake.

I think it was a bit bigger then a Cruise Missile.


It would have to be able to fool the average person.
Look as much like an airliner as possible from a distance.
I think it was an A3 Skywarrior Remote piloted.
It fits the phisical evidence better.
Just in theory, IMO.

I'll bet you this is Disinfo planted then later discredited.

okay, even if the video is real. Wich if the government snatched it up, why is it leaked now? And that is one ig as cruise missile. Why is it that everyone thinks the government needed to kill that many people to start a war. How many did they kill to go into Iraq the first time.

it isn't about how many people they had to kill, its about duping the general population into believing we were truly attacked by these foreign extremists...and it worked, many dont question what happened that day when there are many questions that need to be answered.

__________________

it could be a cruise missile if they shot it while sitting on the ground shooting it straight at it...

look at the trajectory of where that originated.. its practically skimming the ground

and if someone did shoot it from right there on the ground of close by, let me tell you that explosion....ha would be SO much bigger

Problems with the video

1. Cruise Missiles EXPLODE,
2. The video doesn't cover far enough to determine if the object is in fact a cruise missile.
3. Quality sucks
4. Giving proof of editing is the fact that it is a gif, not a mp4 or other video format (which also explains its for shit quality, and for shit length)


I think this merely a shitty video that was made shittier by editing.

__________________
Libertas inaestimabilis res est - Liberty is a thing beyond all price. | Sic Semper Tyrannis

Conspiracy theorists......Not real dude

Even if the vid isnt real...does anyone think its odd, thats these supposed terrorists were sooo skilled with operating the planes? I mean not only did they fly a plane into the Pentagon, but they flew it straight into the side, not on top, not hitting the ground slightly before, right into the side, basically parallel to the ground? I wont be a sheep. It was a missile.

__________________