Forum Shop Market
Seeds FAQ Tools
SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS
Looking for Legal Marijuana look no further!
  #81    
Old 07-01-2009, 02:36 PM
TheBrutalTruth's Avatar
Mr.Ganja
Mr. Ganja
TheBrutalTruth is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,170
TheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to beholdTheBrutalTruth is a splendid one to behold
Points: 13,281, Level: 16 Points: 13,281, Level: 16 Points: 13,281, Level: 16
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by riznob10000 View Post
I just want to say that i think the idea of " land ownership " is ridiculous in it's entirety. How can you " own " something that is ever changing, was there before you ever came along, and will be there long after you are gone. Who did you " buy " it from, and who " sold " it to them. Or who did you " take " it from, and who did they " take " it from. Up here, we have people say " I own that river, stream, creek, etc. " Really, how the fuck are you going to own a river. Give me a break. And when you take religion, which should be seperate from everything except what's in your own mind, and add it to the mix, well, obviously everything just gets more fucked up. We are one species, living on one planet. You either care about every person on the planet, or you care only about yourself. Everything for everone, or nothing for anyone. You choose.
Its their property because they are using it. Your arguments break down when they are applied to determining whether or not a person has a right to land that they are living on. In your case the answer is no, in the case of any rational human being that actually respects the laws and customs of society the answer is a resounding yes.

Or a better argument for property rights is the argument that has the person that is claiming ownership has improved the land by building structures on it, it is thus their land.

So, Improvement, by building on it, Occupation, by living on it, or Use, of it are key tests for property rights, but not the only tests. As the structure of society is built up on the rights of holders of properties to deny those rights is to deny society.

Your arguments show an extreme misunderstanding of what society is, and how it came to be.
__________________
Libertas inaestimabilis res est - Liberty is a thing beyond all price. | Sic Semper Tyrannis
Reply With Quote
  #82    
Old 07-01-2009, 03:39 PM
riznob10000's Avatar
420 TIME
Stoner
riznob10000 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 434
riznob10000 is a jewel in the roughriznob10000 is a jewel in the roughriznob10000 is a jewel in the roughriznob10000 is a jewel in the rough
Points: 55,643, Level: 33 Points: 55,643, Level: 33 Points: 55,643, Level: 33
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrutalTruth View Post
Its their property because they are using it. Your arguments break down when they are applied to determining whether or not a person has a right to land that they are living on. In your case the answer is no, in the case of any rational human being that actually respects the laws and customs of society the answer is a resounding yes.

Or a better argument for property rights is the argument that has the person that is claiming ownership has improved the land by building structures on it, it is thus their land.

So, Improvement, by building on it, Occupation, by living on it, or Use, of it are key tests for property rights, but not the only tests. As the structure of society is built up on the rights of holders of properties to deny those rights is to deny society.

Your arguments show an extreme misunderstanding of what society is, and how it came to be.
The structure of society has always been dictated by the " have's " as opposed to the " have not's ". And my argument wasn't that, more a simplification of what should be. And i misunderstand nothing, i know how the world works, and for the most part, it's completely fucked up! You have roughly 20% of the world's population consuming 80% of it's production ( industrialized countries ). There is an extreme dissparity between those who have and those who have not. In America, you have single induviduals who claim to own 10,000/100,000/1,000,000 acres of land, while all over the world you have 1,000,000 people trying to exist, to survive, to not starve to death on 100 square acres. I make no illusions as to how the world and " societies " operate. And i know the difference between right and wrong. If i go and occupy 5 acres of the man's property that owns 1,000,000 acres, maybe put up some structures, plant a garden, bury a family member, is it then mine? Or do I owe something to him? Some of my ancestors came from Europe, fleeing religious persecution ( just like the Jewish, if anyone happens to miss the correllation ). Can I go back and say they land they used to " occupy " should now be mine? Fuck whoever lives there now? People need to quit being so goddamned materialistic, or religious zealots, and realize we're all in this together. One tribe of many faces.
__________________
Think For Yourself. Question Authority.
N.W. Washington Guerilla Grow........10,000 Watt Grow.........
Reply With Quote
  #83    
Old 07-01-2009, 08:24 PM
bicycle racer's Avatar
Mr.Ganja
Mr. Ganja
bicycle racer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: california
Posts: 2,920
bicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to behold
Points: 8,726, Level: 13 Points: 8,726, Level: 13 Points: 8,726, Level: 13
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
oh so you have to be a soldier from an established overpowering and wrong nation to qualify as a soldier well the mental training and propaganda has worked. attempt free thought at some point its more satisfying. so when our founding fathers of this country fought the english and with no established country to speak of they were something else than soldiers? so any time a population fights against unjust action there not soldiers but what? think before you post.
Reply With Quote
  #84    
Old 07-01-2009, 08:30 PM
bicycle racer's Avatar
Mr.Ganja
Mr. Ganja
bicycle racer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: california
Posts: 2,920
bicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to behold
Points: 8,726, Level: 13 Points: 8,726, Level: 13 Points: 8,726, Level: 13
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
riznob i agree but religious people are stupid and cant see beyond there religion and the feeling there right and devine in there FAITH. its similar to racism im not sure if there is a term for that kind of ignorance so i will call it religalism.
Reply With Quote
  #85    
Old 07-02-2009, 03:25 AM
Stoner
Mr. Ganja
ilkhan is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,079
ilkhan is a name known to allilkhan is a name known to allilkhan is a name known to allilkhan is a name known to allilkhan is a name known to allilkhan is a name known to all
Points: 3,694, Level: 9 Points: 3,694, Level: 9 Points: 3,694, Level: 9
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
TBT is correct.
People come together and form society to protect their property.
Force is the ultimate arbiter of property ownership.
Hence Libertarians dislike for initiating force or violence.
You own yourself, you own your mind, you own your labor,
hence you own the labor on your land.
Most of the horrors that have taken place in the world,
stem from a lack of respect for property rights.

Native Americans didn't believe in owning land.
It worked OK for them, but really the tribes owned land collectively.
They however had relatively low populations.
(save in Mexico were I'm pretty sure property rights were held by kings.)
In a modern society you should be king in your domain.
So long as your not causing property damage to another through your activities.

Don't get to hating on religious people.
Atheists and Agnostics seem just as devout
and snooty in their beliefs.
IMO
Reply With Quote
  #86    
Old 07-02-2009, 11:19 AM
The Warlord's Avatar
Teaching How To Roll
Mr. Ganja
The Warlord is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Right behind you with a big ass knife.
Posts: 1,244
The Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to beholdThe Warlord is a splendid one to behold
Points: 4,221, Level: 9 Points: 4,221, Level: 9 Points: 4,221, Level: 9
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
Quote:
Originally Posted by bicycle racer View Post
oh so you have to be a soldier from an established overpowering and wrong nation to qualify as a soldier well the mental training and propaganda has worked. attempt free thought at some point its more satisfying. so when our founding fathers of this country fought the english and with no established country to speak of they were something else than soldiers? so any time a population fights against unjust action there not soldiers but what? think before you post.

UHMMM.......Well since our leaders got together and basically officialy declared war and raised the CONTINENTAL ARMY they were not terrorists. Armys fight each other, terrorists blow up civilians in cafes and subways. Hardly the same thing, no?
__________________
"If you wanna win, CHEAT! If you lose, start a FIGHT!" - very wise man
Reply With Quote
  #87    
Old 07-02-2009, 11:32 AM
medicineman's Avatar
Marijuana EXPERT
Mr. Ganja
medicineman is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 12,690
medicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 40,764, Level: 29 Points: 40,764, Level: 29 Points: 40,764, Level: 29
Activity: 17% Activity: 17% Activity: 17%
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Warlord View Post
UHMMM.......Well since our leaders got together and basically officialy declared war and raised the CONTINENTAL ARMY they were not terrorists. Armys fight each other, terrorists blow up civilians in cafes and subways. Hardly the same thing, no?
Most of the "Continental army was made up of rif-raf from the frontier. What the British would describe as terrorists. Private citizens in their coon skin caps and long rifles doing battle with the british regulars. It was the terrorist like tactics that brought the British their defeats. Standing in lines in the open didn't work well against colonists behind trees. The powers that be always determine who the terrorists are.
__________________
Life is good, the water is sweet. The ground keeps moving beneath my feet.
Reply With Quote
  #88    
Old 07-02-2009, 12:00 PM
bicycle racer's Avatar
Mr.Ganja
Mr. Ganja
bicycle racer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: california
Posts: 2,920
bicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to beholdbicycle racer is a splendid one to behold
Points: 8,726, Level: 13 Points: 8,726, Level: 13 Points: 8,726, Level: 13
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
my point exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #89    
Old 07-02-2009, 12:06 PM
420 TIME
Stoner
ganjman is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Concrete Jungle AKA London
Posts: 474
ganjman will become famous soon enoughganjman will become famous soon enough
Points: 878, Level: 4 Points: 878, Level: 4 Points: 878, Level: 4
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
This is, summed up, the situation, so listen up lads.

Muslims hate EVERYONE.
Christians hate no one.
Buddists hate no one.
Shiks hate no one.
Jew's and hindus hate muslims.

The muslim bombed the jews, so the jews destroyed the muslims.

What so wrong? That the jews think "Fuck, we're not going to let those dirty suicide bombing scum muslims blow us up, we'll finish them off first."

They're sticking up for themselves, thats all. Just coz christains stand there letting themselves be blown up, and the jews dont and fight back makes the jews look wrong.

Well no way. The muslims are wrong, in every SINGLE little fucked up aspect of their religion.

It's not even about religion. Muslims are bad people. Good people get rid of the bad.

It's, actually, as simple as that. It's all the muslims fault.
Reply With Quote
  #90    
Old 07-02-2009, 12:13 PM
medicineman's Avatar
Marijuana EXPERT
Mr. Ganja
medicineman is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North of mexico and south of Canada
Posts: 12,690
medicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond reputemedicineman has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 40,764, Level: 29 Points: 40,764, Level: 29 Points: 40,764, Level: 29
Activity: 17% Activity: 17% Activity: 17%
Quote:
Originally Posted by ganjman View Post
This is, summed up, the situation, so listen up lads.

Muslims hate EVERYONE.
Christians hate no one.
Buddists hate no one.
Shiks hate no one.
Jew's and hindus hate muslims.

The muslim bombed the jews, so the jews destroyed the muslims.

What so wrong? That the jews think "Fuck, we're not going to let those dirty suicide bombing scum muslims blow us up, we'll finish them off first."

They're sticking up for themselves, thats all. Just coz christains stand there letting themselves be blown up, and the jews dont and fight back makes the jews look wrong.

Well no way. The muslims are wrong, in every SINGLE little fucked up aspect of their religion.

It's not even about religion. Muslims are bad people. Good people get rid of the bad.

It's, actually, as simple as that. It's all the muslims fault.
"I'm smart because I smoke weed"? Seems like weed is making you dumber than a box of rocks. Not all muslims are bad, just as not all christians are bad. George Bush, a professed Christian, is responsible for a million lives. He is a bad christian. Anyone that believes in the taking of lives to promote a point is in my mind a bad person, no matter what religion or non-religion they hail from.
__________________
Life is good, the water is sweet. The ground keeps moving beneath my feet.
 

Tags
israel, poor

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Come Check out a new Poker Forum for the online poker community

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:15 AM.
Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2