You just lost all credibility by mentioning the NWO. Sorry. This shows your reckless bias. There is no such thing as the New World Order. Let me guess, you believe in the Illuminati, too? And the reptilians who are plotting the demise of humanity for 2012?

I do not need to do my homework. I stand on neutral ground, and thus it is you who must prove your argument to me. YOU are making a subjective claim, not me.

Funny thing is GrowRebel used Thompson's six-year-old timeline, which was factually based, as supportive evidence. Thompson knows more about 9/11 than perhaps anyone else. Does he believe that the government was behind the attacks? Absolutely not. Which his timeline painstakingly details! Again, another case of using factual evidence and tacking on some bullshit to make your view look a bit more valid. It's sad.

A couple of tac strikes would neutralize the threat. That Military parade thats always shown is probly all he got in one video clip. Its like a short train of obscelete crap. I doubt UN would even occupy N. Korea. It would be like an action in Africa where also there is nothing to legally exploit. Kim's just blowing through his retirement. I feel that if there are scientists smart enough to handle thois equipment in such a capacity they would not make such a blunder like attack, or aid ther of, another country. I think they are just gonna do a national power grid or something like that.....they have a small enough country to do that. I am sorry to disappoint the doom and gloomers. And do you think that the muslum extremists are growing tired of being on the run? God Bless America, She'll come around soon on the pot thing, but the odor may cover up Brainwashed Extemist hodgies and guns......kinda strong when its fresh and not in smuggle baggies......and rubbermaids got it maid...so there has got to be another reason out there.....that we can't have it now. Gotta be.

__________________
I can't help it, i like to tell bullshit stories about Marijuana. And i like to look at the tabooed plant on the internet, its a Strange hobby but it's cheap entertainment.

yea, 9/11 was an attack from a couple crazy fuckers. so we atatcked a country and made a whole race of enemys. The good news is at least we can fix it. Also those guilty of starting a war for profit should get the same as Suddam. That would send a worldwide message of equality and show that we are for the greater good. Have we wiped out the blood bathe people yet? Crazy shit going on...ethnic clensing OK! They did define themselfs as the enemy is what makes this interesting. All I can say is that if you don't know enough if you can take sides easily, and so entirely!

__________________
I can't help it, i like to tell bullshit stories about Marijuana. And i like to look at the tabooed plant on the internet, its a Strange hobby but it's cheap entertainment.

Let's be logical here and say that an international response is unlikely. Even though China and Russia denounced the N. Korean tests, it does not mean they will respond. It's extraordinarily difficult, and you have to somewhat rely on tea leaves. The countries that matter most in this crisis are;

N. Korea
U.S.
S. Korea
Japan
China
Russia

They are known as the six-parties (you will hear six-party talks a lot), which is a coalition of the six countries to seek peaceful concessions after N. Korea pulled out of the non-proliferation treaty and N. Korea started making nuclear weapons. But the parties have expanded now, and they all must now take into consideration;

Iran & Syria (N. Korea's nuclear partners).

Due to lack of response from the U.S. recently, Japan just announced they'll be launching a satellite to monitor launches in N. Korea. If anyone in these talks have first hand experience with nuclear weapons, it's JAPAN. And japan is one of two participants in the six-party talks that DON'T have nuclear weapons. And Japan remains an easy and formidable target for N. Korea, and would be their #2 priority. S. Korea, on the other hand is N. Korea's 1st target. And S. Korea DON'T have nuclear weapons either. S. Korea has a few U.S. Bases, and the Navy's 7th feet to protect it.

The problem here is that the U.S. has been the nuclear shield for Japan and S. Korea since the Korean War. And in one instant, both countries realized that shield is down with Obama's administration. But in reality, Obama's best option is the re-establishment of the six-party talks. However, this may not work, because it will be different for N. Korea since China and Russia will stand against their actions here. In addition, Obama just announced that Iran has a right to nuclear energy. He can make the same claim for N. Korea during these six-party talks. Considering that the two most probable targets are S. Korea and Japan, I personally don't see a positive outcome. The best thing Obama can do is try the six-party talks, while maintaining a strong shield on alert protecting the Western U.S., S. Korea, and Japan in the event of a preemptive attack. Shooting down his tests before the six-party talks would guaranty a negative outcome with conflict between N. Korea and S. Korea. However, if we get to the six-party talks without conflict, and those talks fail to resolve any issues, then Obama should then be ready to move fast with more drastic measures. The second worst outcome would be to allo N. Korea to proliferate their nuclear weaons. So far, we're on course, I think. Just as long Obama doesn't drop the defense shield that he just cut funding for.

Always avoid nuclear weapons. At all costs. We do not need one nuke to destroy N. Korea. We can do so with conventional warfare. It won't take much to create nuclear fallout across the world. Bombing anyone to the stone age with nuclear weapons is suicide.

And you just demonstrated your stupidity ... Sorry but you are just one of those people that are just too stupid or too lazy to find out for yourself. I'm not going to tell you to take my word for it like your leaders ... lumpboy and hannity ... I'm giving you the info and telling you to check it out for yourself. ... and what makes you think PNAC doesn't what a NWO? So what do you call this ... a summary of the talking points from their own document ...a link to PNAC web site with where the original document can be found is provided.
[quote]
26) "This is a blueprint for United States world domination - a new world order of their making, "Tam Dalyell, British parliamentarian and critic of the war policy from the Labor Party said.

PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY (PNAC)

So go ahead ... make your stupid reptile remarks ... you only show your own ignorance. And while we are at it ... why don't you tell us all why NWO is bullshit ... we'd love to hear.


Oh yeah ... you do need to do your homework ... you are standing on ignorant ground now. I've giving enough information IMO ... if you can't comprehend it ... that's not my problem ...



When and where did I say Thompson's time line was supportive of 911 being an inside job? ... I don't agree with him on 911 at all but I agree with him on Afghanistan and the US having "plans" for it... his is not the only report ... I provided two sources ... there are others ... if you took the time to read my post you wouldn't look pathetic now... which beats sad anyday.

__________________
Our Beautiful Ladies ...
Keep Them Safe Keep Them SECRET!
911 ... inside job!

Are you going to deny your own reasoning doesn't follow as such: 1) Governments and political elites draw up plans to invade the Middle-East 2) Government engages in a false flag operation 3)Using said false flag operation as grounds for invading and occupying two other countries 4) Elites gain tens of billions in contracts, a good portion being no bid contracts and government can establish permanent bases in the region

It may be a little more nuanced than that, but that's a pretty accurate description of your views, right? If so, you used factual information provided by Thompson's fantastic work to provide some context to your bullshit theory. Funny how I'm the one who is pathetic and not the person that's viewed as a loon by the vast majority of physicists, engineers and architects.

You demonstrate once again your stupidity ... vast majority of physicists, engineers and architects think I'm a loon huh ... such as ... ? And what part of my so called theory is bullshit? I'd love to hear that one. Doubt that you will be able to be specific ... On the other hand I've provide a link to engineers, and architects demanding a new investigation into 911 ... so yes ... you are pretty pathetic ... if anyone's a loon to them it's you that believe that those building fell due to a plane crash and fire. So let see some links of these physicists, engineers, and architects that think I'm a loon.

Put up or stfu ...

__________________
Our Beautiful Ladies ...
Keep Them Safe Keep Them SECRET!
911 ... inside job!

Seeing as you didn't make reference to my reply, I was pretty god damn spot on in guessing your fucked up line of thought, huh? To answer your question, it's your assertion that it was an inside job (as part of a false flag operation) and controlled demolitions. This has nothing to do with wanting a new investigation, only your conspiracy theory.

To even suggest that a majority of physicists, engineers and architects support your position is a fucking joke that even your everyday idiotic troofer doesn’t even maintain. Let's see their findings actually appear in scientific peer review journals. I found a number for my side, but I think that I'll only provide one for now, given as to how you won't even be able to ferret out one for your side. The American population has never been confused for brilliant, but even a vast majority of them aren’t dumb enough to buy into this lunacy.


The American Society of Civil Engineers is the largest and oldest engineering organization in the country. Guess what, they're the group that compiled and studied the data for the World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations and the Pentagon Building Performance Report. You'll reject this since it was put out by FEMA. But you'll be rejecting the findings of an organization that represents nearly 150,000 civil engineers. How many engineers do you maintain support your claims? A few hundred and that's a very liberal estimate.

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch1.pdf
http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf


Here's a list of the 'scholars' that comprise the Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice: http://stj911.org/members/index.html

As you can see about half of their academic qualifications are left blank and few are Ph. D's, let alone in fields related to physics and engineering.


http://www.lera.com/sep11.htm

From LERA, the structural engineering firm that built the god damn buildings: 'We designed the towers to resist the accidental impact of a Boeing 707, perhaps lost in the fog while seeking to land. The impact of the Boeing 767s, commandeered by the terrorists, even though larger and flying much faster, was still unable to bring down the towers. The fire-resistive systems, however, did not and could not have contemplated the subsequent fire fueled by thousands of gallons of jet fuel.'


Eight reports compiled by M.I.T. engineers: http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/


Report co-authored by a SES Prager recipient:
http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf

How many ‘scholars’ that believe in controlled demolitions have won a Prager? Oh yeah, that’d be none. That's because they're nobodies within their respective fields.


Reports utilizing over 200 technical analysts from the National Institute of Standards and Technology which is home to three Nobel Prize winners: http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1Draft.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-1.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-2Draft.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-3Draft.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-4Draft.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-5Draft.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-6Draft.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-7.pdf
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-81.pdf


From engineers published in the peer review journal The Journal of The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society: http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Biederman/Biederman-0112.html


Presented at the prestigious
Australian Institute of Building Surveyors
National Conference: http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/latest/aibs_2002_wtc.pdf


There are literally hundreds upon hundreds, but I'll give you an opportunity to respond, so we can go tit for tat. And for someone to continuously use ellipsis after ellipsis in place of periods, you're fucking ballsy to question my intellect. Why is it you troofers type like tweens?

Just out of curiosity... logistically...

Am I to understand that teams of XXXXXX agents infiltrated the WTC in teams carrying explosives and construction equipment... went from floor to floor... tearing out walls, planting precision detonating equipment, resealed the walls, painted and cleaned the mess... on 118 floors... when the building was empty (WTC was NEVER empy).

Does that about sum it up?

How long you suppose that took?