Results 1 to 4 of 4
Politics

New York Plans Surveillance Veil for Downtown

in the

Cannabis Cafe

forums; http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/09/ny...in&oref=slogin By the end of this year, police officials say, more than 100 cameras will have begun monitoring cars moving ...
  1. #1
    Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja Dankdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006

    Location
    Somewhere in Texas
    Posts
    2,889

    Default New York Plans Surveillance Veil for Downtown

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/09/ny...in&oref=slogin

    By the end of this year, police officials say, more than 100 cameras will have begun monitoring cars moving through Lower Manhattan, the beginning phase of a London-style surveillance system that would be the first in the United States.

    The Lower Manhattan Security Initiative, as the plan is called, will resemble London’s so-called Ring of Steel, an extensive web of cameras and roadblocks designed to detect, track and deter terrorists. British officials said images captured by the cameras helped track suspects after the London subway bombings in 2005 and the car bomb plots last month.

    If the program is fully financed, it will include not only license plate readers but also 3,000 public and private security cameras below Canal Street, as well as a center staffed by the police and private security officers, and movable roadblocks.

    “This area is very critical to the economic lifeblood of this nation,” New York City’s police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, said in an interview last week. “We want to make it less vulnerable.”

    But critics question the plan’s efficacy and cost, as well as the implications of having such heavy surveillance over such a broad swath of the city.

    For a while, it appeared that New York could not even afford such a system. Last summer, Mr. Kelly said that the program was in peril after the city’s share of Homeland Security urban grant money was cut by nearly 40 percent.

    But Mr. Kelly said last week that the department had since obtained $25 million toward the estimated $90 million cost of the plan. Fifteen million dollars came from Homeland Security grants, he said, while another $10 million came from the city, more than enough to install 116 license plate readers in fixed and mobile locations, including cars and helicopters, in the coming months.

    The readers have been ordered, and Mr. Kelly said he hoped the rest of the money would come from additional federal grants.

    The license plate readers would check the plates’ numbers and send out alerts if suspect vehicles were detected. The city is already seeking state approval to charge drivers a fee to enter Manhattan below 86th Street, which would require the use of license plate readers. If the plan is approved, the police will most likely collect information from those readers too, Mr. Kelly said.

    But the downtown security plan involves much more than keeping track of license plates. Three thousand surveillance cameras would be installed below Canal Street by the end of 2008, about two-thirds of them owned by downtown companies. Some of those are already in place. Pivoting gates would be installed at critical intersections; they would swing out to block traffic or a suspect car at the push of a button.

    Unlike the 250 or so cameras the police have already placed in high-crime areas throughout the city, which capture moving images that have to be downloaded, the security initiative cameras would transmit live information instantly.

    The operation will cost an estimated $8 million to run the first year, Mr. Kelly said. Its headquarters will be in Lower Manhattan, he said, though the police were still negotiating where exactly it will be. The police and corporate security agents will work together in the center, said Paul J. Browne, the chief spokesman for the police. The plan does not need City Council approval, he said.

    The Police Department is still considering whether to use face-recognition technology, an inexact science that matches images against those in an electronic database, or biohazard detectors in its Lower Manhattan network, Mr. Browne said.

    The entire operation is forecast to be in place and running by 2010, in time for the projected completion of several new buildings in the financial district, including the new Goldman Sachs world headquarters.

    Civil liberties advocates said they were worried about misuse of technology that tracks the movement of thousands of cars and people,

    Would this mean that every Wall Street broker, every tourist munching a hot dog near the United States Court House and every sightseer at ground zero would constantly be under surveillance?

    “This program marks a whole new level of police monitoring of New Yorkers and is being done without any public input, outside oversight, or privacy protections for the hundreds of thousands of people who will end up in N.Y.P.D. computers," Christopher Dunn, a lawyer with the New York Civil Liberties Union, wrote in an e-mail message.

    He said he worried about what would happen to the images once they were archived, how they would be used by the police and who else would have access to them.

    Already, according to a report last year by the civil liberties group, there are nearly 4,200 public and private surveillance cameras below 14th Street, a fivefold increase since 1998, with virtually no oversight over what becomes of the recordings.

    Mr. Browne said that the Police Department would have control over how the material is used. He said that the cameras would be recording in “areas where there’s no expectation of privacy” and that law-abiding citizens had nothing to fear.

    “It would be used to intercept a threat coming our way, but not to collect data indiscriminately on individuals,” he said.

    Mr. Browne said software tracking the cameras’ images would be designed to pick up suspicious behavior. If, for example, a bag is left unattended for a certain length of time, or a suspicious car is detected repeatedly circling the same block, the system will send out an alert, he said.

    Still, there are questions about whether such surveillance devices indeed serve their purpose.

    There is little evidence to suggest that security cameras deter crime or terrorists, said James J. Carafano, a senior fellow for homeland security at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research group in Washington.

    For all its comprehensiveness, London’s Ring of Steel, which was built in the early 1990s to deter Irish Republican Army attacks, did not prevent the July 7, 2005, subway bombings or the attempted car bombings in London last month. But the British authorities said the cameras did prove useful in retracing the paths of the suspects’ cars last month, leading to several arrests.

    While having 3,000 cameras whirring at the same time means loads of information will be captured, it also means there will be a lot of useless data to sift through.

    “The more hay you have, the harder it is to find the needle,” said Mr. Carafano.
    "Dissent is the Highest form of Patriotism" -- Howard Zinn

  2. #2
    Elite Rolling Society Mr. Ganja Roseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007

    Location
    in Michigan, in the arms of GOD
    Posts
    8,186

    Default

    That has already been done in a lot of major cities. NY is behind because they didn't have the money to do it.
    we use to call it
    BIG BROTHER

  3. #3
    Marijuana EXPERT Mr. Ganja medicineman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Location
    North of mexico and south of Canada
    Posts
    13,840

    Default

    Big brother is right on track to putting a camera in your bedroom so all those sickos in DC can watch you screw your mate. Maybe coming out with some how to pointers and definently some dos and don'ts.
    Once upon a time...................

  4. #4
    Just some idiot Mr. Ganja Gygax1974's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007

    Posts
    2,419

    Default

    George Orwell's 1984 is starting to become a reality...scary.

Similar Threads

  1. Do you live in New York?
    By moosifer in forum Politics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-04-2008, 06:28 PM
  2. Everybody plans for 4/20?
    By joejohn in forum Toke N Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-11-2007, 04:30 AM
  3. Change of Plans
    By ExplicitKilla in forum Newbie Central
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-30-2007, 05:27 PM
  4. Counter Surveillance
    By Clown Spoog in forum Outdoor Growing
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-18-2007, 05:55 PM
  5. Mendacity and the New York Times
    By Wavels in forum Politics
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 01-19-2007, 04:39 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •