http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/pol...ma.daschle.cnn
In an interview regarding his selection of Tom Daschle, Obama says he personally takes responsibility for having selected Daschle, admits it was a mistake in light of what is now known about Daschle's tax issues, and says he will not let it happen again. This is a relatively minor political issue with no real impact on our country. As a contrast, George Bush royally fucked up everything his little monkey paws could get hold of, left our country in shambles, and has the balls to claim that in the near future history will show he was a good president. Talk about the audacity of hope! Well, it is nice to see a leader take responsibility for their actions for the first time in 8 years.

The reason why bush thinks he will be remembered kindly is because he knows that historians don't pay attention to the spin doctors.... they will disseminate the good and the bad , and in the case of george Bush, will more than likely put him near the top of the list. of course you won't see that list for at least a decade or so....that's why it's done by historians


of course he may look TERRIFIC in as little as 2-4 years.... the way things are going for Obama....



out.

__________________
...out
______________________________________
You haven't countered nothing, because the points you made are not valid, you are basing your counter on information you don't understand, regardless the accuracy of the information, because it does not state what you are saying.. (Brazko)

Man oh man! Do you people get tired of telling yourself lies? I live in Virginia and your response reminds me of the local contingent of rednecks who continue to assert that the south was correct in wanting the civil war but the North "re-wrote" the history books after winning...hahahahhaha what bullshit. I have no sympathy for Bush supporters, his brand of "leadership" has near completely broken and destroyed this country.

agreed, not to mention all the blood he has on his hands...

Just a quick question, Bradly ... When was the last time you read an UN-revised history book on the War Against Secession?

Vi

__________________
Liberals are people that will believe anything twice.

I have been using the internets to try and find an occassion where Bush said, "I take responsibility", "it's my fault", or "I was wrong". It appears there is no documentation of him having ever said any of those things.

My response reminds you of something....that's nice but not exactly a correlation (go ahead and look it up).

Your post reminds me of washer machines. Whatever that means....

Spock U R Not

out.

out.

__________________
...out
______________________________________
You haven't countered nothing, because the points you made are not valid, you are basing your counter on information you don't understand, regardless the accuracy of the information, because it does not state what you are saying.. (Brazko)

There is no discernable "correlation" between the truth and your assertion that Bush was even a mediocre president. I used a chi-squared non-parametric linear regression analysis (Look it up ) to statistically support this statement.
An internet search of the phrase "worst president ever" yields the links shown below. As I said, you are a willing participant in your own deception.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/pro...ent_in_history
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070226/howl
http://harpers.org/archive/2008/04/hbc-90002804
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...120101509.html
http://hnn.us/articles/48916.html
This was just the first 10 results. Bush took up space in the oval office for 8 years but that bitch was never my president.

Your definition is in the present, mine is not. Neither is Bush's. I posted as much. re read it and see where you made ur goof.

As for polls, most people can't even find south dakota on the map..... nuff said.

out.

__________________
...out
______________________________________
You haven't countered nothing, because the points you made are not valid, you are basing your counter on information you don't understand, regardless the accuracy of the information, because it does not state what you are saying.. (Brazko)

That's because mine is based on fact, your's is based on wishful speculation. I bet my right arm Bush can't find South Dakota on a map either