Uh, yes.

I did all that sex education in school, and there were still pregnancies and STDs rampant. I'm not pro abstinence, I am pro responsibility. If you mess up, you deal with the consequences, not wave a wand and tell the good doctor to take the little bothersome thing away so you can have some more fun.

This is trivial, admit it. Attack her on a real issue.

__________________
Am I supposed to have some sort of disclaimer here?

How about trying to get her ex-brother-in-law fired from the AHP, family interest, as governor. Don't worry, there will be a shitpot of Gaffs in her so called carreer.

__________________
Life is good, the water is sweet. The ground keeps moving beneath my feet.

She addressed this you know-

Palin has said previously that she discussed Wooten with Monegan only in the context of security concerns for the family. Monegan has said that Palin never directly told him to fire Wooten but that the message was clearly conveyed through repeated messages from Palin, her husband and three members of her Cabinet.

To allege that I, or any member of my family . . . directed disciplinary action be taken against any employee of the Department of Public Safety, is, quite simply, outrageous," Palin said in a statement in mid-July after Monegan's dismissal.

He showed The Post two e-mails he received from Palin, but he declined to give copies. The first e-mail came on Feb. 7, 2007, after the governor's husband, Todd, met with Monegan to press the case for disciplinary action against Wooten. Palin's family had accused the trooper of shooting a cow moose without a permit, Tasering his stepson, and drinking while driving a trooper vehicle. After her husband met with Monegan, Palin followed up with a phone call to Monegan.

Scout.com: Update: Palin the Trooper Snooper

------------------------

This is all?

__________________
Am I supposed to have some sort of disclaimer here?

How about "Yes I'll take your $400 million and the spout about saying no to the "bridge to nowhere"? Where'd the money go?

Flopping Aces » Blog Archive Palin’s “Bridge to Nowhere”: Fiscally responsible or politically expedient?

I've checked you're little accusation, and I do not see where she got the money. She didn't go ahead because it would cost to much for the taxpayers, so they didn't give a dime.

Is there something I am missing?

__________________
Am I supposed to have some sort of disclaimer here?

Palin "bridge to nowhere" line angers many Alaskans

In the city Ketchikan, the planned site of the so-called "Bridge to Nowhere," political leaders of both parties said the claim was false and a betrayal of their community, because she had supported the bridge and the earmark for it secured by Alaska's Congressional delegation during her run for governor.

"She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money," said Elerding about her applause line.

"You don't tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it," said Phillips, who supported Palin's opponent, Democrat Tony Knowles, in the 2006 gubernatorial race.

Palin "bridge to nowhere" line angers many Alaskans - Yahoo! News

[quote=ZenMaster;1273957] She didn't go ahead because it would cost to much for the taxpayers, so they didn't give a dime.

quote]

i don't have the reference, but it was reported on the network news that the money for the bridge was included in a general grant to the state that allowed the state to decide its own priorities. palin decided that the bridge was too controversial and that there were better uses of the money. that was the story, anyway.

__________________
don;t trust me when i'm baked, i make shit up. bud stud in training - at http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...ts-always.html and http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...melicious.html

We have conflicting sources, mine says that she did NOT tax the Alaskans, so how would she keep that money?

Second, she didn't because of one, the funding, and two she felt like exploring alternate routes. Tough decision to make but she made it.

__________________
Am I supposed to have some sort of disclaimer here?

It wasn't just Alaska citizens that were paying for it. Government funding means we all chipped in.


Last year, Palin announced she was stopping state work on the controversial project, earning her admirers from earmark critics and budget hawks from around the nation. The move also thrust her into the spotlight as a reform-minded newcomer.

The state, however, never gave back any of the money that was originally earmarked for the Gravina Island bridge, said Weinstein and Elerding.

In fact, the Palin administration has spent "tens of millions of dollars" in federal funds to start building a road on Gravina Island that is supposed to link up to the yet-to-be-built bridge, Weinstein said.

"She said 'thanks but no thanks,' but they kept the money," said Elerding about her applause line.

http://www.floppingaces.net/2008/08/...lly-expedient/

The project has some federal money but is short about $300 million. No one expects Congress to kick in any more cash, and most legislators aren’t willing to open up the state checkbook. So the likely place to find $300 million is from the pockets of users. But we’re not talking about dropping a few coins into a toll basket. Get ready to dig into your wallet and pull out a lot of bills to drive on a long approach ramp to climb 200 feet in the air on one bridge, then down on a middle island, then up 120 feet in the air on a second bridge to reach the airport island, and down again on another long ramp. Or just leave it as is, and ride the shuttle ferry a few minutes for the short walk to the terminal.

At that point, Palin was still allowing design and feasibility to still go forward. So where are we now:

-She inherited the controversial project, knowing there was a need.
-The transition team’s reports showed the that project, plus another, were not fiscally responsible and the federal funding came no where close to paying for the bridge.
-She did not allocate any State monies for go ahead with the expensive bridge
-Many Alaskans, including those in Ketchikan, were also opposed to the bridge at that expense
-They were considering alternative methods.

Between the fiscal analyses, plus dissenting voices protesting the expense it would lay upon the taxpayers, is it any wonder that by September 2007, Palin officially canned the Bridge to Nowhere project, to the criticism of it’s advocates.

__________________
Am I supposed to have some sort of disclaimer here?