if someone says a 13 year old can consent to sex with an adult

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
This isn't about what individuals think, it's about the definition of a pedophile relative to statutory rape . The fact is, the definition is a function of where you live in this country.
No, it's about a person having argued for months that pedophilia is consensual and right wing shit stains agreeing with him while everyone else is shocked.
 

god1

Well-Known Member
No, it's about a person having argued for months that pedophilia is consensual and right wing shit stains agreeing with him while everyone else is shocked.

The reason you've argued for months is that you haven't used a point of reference to resolve the difference in opinions. Without a basis for a decision the bull shit will just continue ad nauseum.

The other person's opinion is just as valid as yours. The definition of pedophilia is not based on a mathematical process, isn't a law of physics or nature, it's a man made definition, ie, it can be modified, changed, altered.

In our society we use these things called "laws" as metrics to specify the concept. If you truly want resolution use the definition. Otherwise continue with the bull shit. All the mental midgets in the world arguing from the point of view of "shock" doesn't make your opinion any more valid.
 

cc2012

Well-Known Member
Why does Admin keep removing Posts that are Bucktards OWN words? will bucky Cry? Poor little poopy pants.. .. :D
 
Last edited:

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The reason you've argued for months is that you haven't used a point of reference to resolve the difference in opinions. Without a basis for a decision the bull shit will just continue ad nauseum.

The other person's opinion is just as valid as yours. The definition of pedophilia is not based on a mathematical process, isn't a law of physics or nature, it's a man made definition, ie, it can be modified, changed, altered.

In our society we use these things called "laws" as metrics to specify the concept. If you truly want resolution use the definition. Otherwise continue with the bull shit. All the mental midgets in the world arguing from the point of view of "shock" doesn't make your opinion any more valid.
We're not arguing over the definition of pedophilia, ya dingus.

He thinks children can consent to have sex with adults.
 

cc2012

Well-Known Member
We're not arguing over the definition of pedophilia, ya dingus.

He thinks children can consent to have sex with adults.
“Projecting our problems onto other people”

Psychological projection is the phenomenon whereby one projects one’s own thoughts, motivations, desires, feelings, and so on onto someone else (usually another person, but psychological projection onto animals, parents, children, neighbors, other drivers, political figures, racial groups, states and countries, also occurs).

According to the theories of Sigmund Freud, psychological projection is a psychological defense mechanism whereby one “projects” one’s own undesirable thoughts, motivations, desires, feelings, and so on onto someone else (usually another person, but psychological projection onto animals and inanimate objects also occurs). The principle of projection is well-established in psychology.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob ROy will not answer the question no.
One can only assume he is a child molester. Kind of makes sense since the institution he is in right now only lets him use the computer twice a day
 

god1

Well-Known Member
We're not arguing over the definition of pedophilia, ya dingus.

He thinks children can consent to have sex with adults.
Are really that dense?
Read the op's post, how do you respond without a definition of a pedo???
The questions are rhetorical ... no need to respond I know the answers.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Are really that dense?
Read the op's post, how do you respond without a definition of a pedo???
The questions are rhetorical ... no need to respond I know the answers.
Are you really that dense?

We are not arguing over the definition of pedophilia. The question in the OP and title is rhetorical. This arose because a particular member has been ARGUING FOR MONTHS THAT A CHILD CAN CONSENT TO SEX WITH AN ADULT.

You're defending that.
 

god1

Well-Known Member
Are you really that dense?

We are not arguing over the definition of pedophilia. The question in the OP and title is rhetorical. This arose because a particular member has been ARGUING FOR MONTHS THAT A CHILD CAN CONSENT TO SEX WITH AN ADULT.

You're defending that.
I don't have a clue as to what your trying to say or accomplish.

My original response was to another poster responding to the ability of a young child to make a decision re copulation. In the US the laws vary by geographical location. The op asked a specific question requiring a definition.

Are you accusing another member of being a pedo? If so you need a definition. Are you saying you don't?
What the fuck are you trying to say?

Maybe you should start another thread and specifically state your case. To the casual observer you're not making any sense. You at least need to include more info.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I don't have a clue as to what your trying to say or accomplish.
I noticed.

What I'm saying, and maybe try reading slowly, sound the difficult words out one letter at a time, is that there is a member here who has been arguing for months that children can consent to sex with adults.

Rob Roy thinks children can consent to have sex with adults.


Hopefully this clears things up for you, since you're a mouth breathing fucktard.
 
Top