Crucial Evidence That Destroys The Lies In The Brown Shooting

jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
CNN analyst Mel Robbins read a crucial piece of evidence from the transcript that destroys the lies surrounded the shooting of Michael Brown. In short, there is a trail of blood that proves Michael Brown turned away from officer Wilson and then turned back around and moved toward him at least 20 feet, which corroborates Officer Wilson’s testimony.

20 feet is a long way when an officer is telling you to stop and surrender.

It's scientific proof that the witnesses who supported Michael Brown were lying and officer Wilson was telling the truth. I believe that's checkmate.

http://therightscoop.com/cnn-analyst-reads-crucial-evidence-that-destroys-the-lies-about-michael-brown-shooting/#ixzz3K8wE5XH7
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I'm sure the blood stains are racist and moved themselves to make brown appear anything other than the sweet innocent altar boy he was.

In before tiny penis ( aka Unclebuck )
 
R

ricky6991

Well-Known Member
All this is reviewed by a jury of our peers already. Verdict is in , we should move on. Our country has this type of system for many many years...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
CNN analyst Mel Robbins read a crucial piece of evidence from the transcript that destroys the lies surrounded the shooting of Michael Brown. In short, there is a trail of blood that proves Michael Brown turned away from officer Wilson and then turned back around and moved toward him at least 20 feet, which corroborates Officer Wilson’s testimony.

20 feet is a long way when an officer is telling you to stop and surrender.

It's scientific proof that the witnesses who supported Michael Brown were lying and officer Wilson was telling the truth. I believe that's checkmate.

http://therightscoop.com/cnn-analyst-reads-crucial-evidence-that-destroys-the-lies-about-michael-brown-shooting/#ixzz3K8wE5XH7
Click to expand...
almost all 18 witnesses that contradict wilson's story all say he turned around and walked towards the cops with his hands up, actually.

fail thread from beenthere. no surprise.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
LOL Tiny penis makes the argument that eye witnesses are more reliable than forensic evidence. Tiny penis has no hope of a cool soothing feeling after butthurt medication is applied.
Click to expand...
the eyewitness statements match the forensic evidence, dumbass.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
LOL Tiny penis makes the argument that eye witnesses are more reliable than forensic evidence. Tiny penis has no hope of a cool soothing feeling after butthurt medication is applied.
Click to expand...
I believe most people that are being told by a cop to stop, turn around and come at the officer, even after they are shot and bleeding, they still come at the officer for over 20' until they drop dead.:lol:.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
It would be difficult to put in one of the other threads since tiny penis and I have pretty much locked those threads up with Tiny penis failure.
Click to expand...
well, i'm glad to see you have realized your lying and backpedaling and cowardice is the stuff that tiny penises are made of.
 
ButchyBoy

ButchyBoy

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
the eyewitness statements match the forensic evidence, dumbass.
Click to expand...
Funnay shit right there!!! not all of the witnesses statements match the evidence.. some witnesses say he was walking with his hands up. some say with his hands near his chest with his elbows up like he is getting ready to tackle someone. some say he was running away with his hands up. another said he had one hand on his pants as though he was pulling them up... most of them say he was shot while running away!! The forensic evidence shows every bullet entered from the front and some from an angle that shows brown was leaning forward as though he was starting to run. How do you get shot in the front of your body if you are running the other direction?
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
Just about every point the race baiting leftys bring up are refuted by facts.
And not a single one of the chicken shits will admit they were wrong all along.:roll:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
Just about every point the race baiting leftys bring up are refuted by facts.
And not a single one of the chicken shits will admit they were wrong all along.:roll:
Click to expand...
hey beenthere, you still going with that whole "broken eye socket" theory you were yammering about a while back?

:lol:

you don't need a business license to be self employed.
 
NLXSK1

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
hey beenthere, you still going with that whole "broken eye socket" theory you were yammering about a while back?

:lol:

you don't need a business license to be self employed.
Click to expand...
I admit I was wrong about the broken eye socket. I heard it from the media like the eyewitness testimony.

Are you willing to admit you were wrong about many of the eyewitnesses? Or are you just willing to discount the testimony that doesnt back up your assumptions?

Didnt think so...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NLXSK1 said:
I heard it from the media like the eyewitness testimony.
Click to expand...
so did i, but i wasn't dumb enough to believe it.

all the eyewitness testimony i heard, and i heard 4 people testify, was backed up by over a dozen more eyewitnesses.

NLXSK1 said:
Are you willing to admit you were wrong about many of the eyewitnesses?
Click to expand...
no, because i wasn't.

about 18 people told about the same story.

i've asked you to actually cite what you are claiming was wrong, but you refuse. what does that say?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top