Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
You supply a graph with the wrong prediction from the alarmist website skeptical science LOL
Click to expand...
what the fuck are you talking about? that graph is public record, you can get it anywhere because hansen made it public 25 years ago you fucking stooge. the version you posted, which is still unattributed, is clearly falsified.

still waiting on citation of that claim you made about NASA, too. you ever gonna get around to that, beenthere?
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
try to use your words, beenthere.

posting youtube videos when you have still failed to cite your own lies about NASA and unattributed, falsified graphs of hansen's work is lame shit, even for a troglodyte like yourself.
Click to expand...
You can't post crap from skeptical science and be taken seriously you fool. LOL



John Cook is now desperately trying to cover up his background that he was employed as a cartoonist for over a decade with no prior employment history in academia or climate science.

Thanks to the Wayback Machine we can reveal what his website originally said,

"I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist" - John Cook, Skeptical Science



A link from the Skeptical Science "About" page originally went to his cartoonist page,

"John Cook: A cartoonist working from home in Brisbane, Australia" - SEV
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
You can't post crap from skeptical science and be taken seriously you fool. LOL
Click to expand...
logical fallacy, shit for brains.

that graph is posted in a million places, i can post it from the congressional record if you want. hell, i bet even fox news has that graph somewhere if that'll make you happy.

you still have not told us what is wrong with hansen's work.

for that matter, you still have not cited your claim about NASA, nor have you told us what denier site you pulled your obviously falsified graph from.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
You are being laughed at because the majority of the crap you regurgitate comes from an idiots website who has no education or credentials in the science field.

Get this through your tiny brain UncleBuck, he's a cartoonist and a blogger, skeptical science is counterfeit. hack website.



John Cook is now desperately trying to cover up his background that he was employed as a cartoonist for over a decade with no prior employment history in academia or climate science.

Thanks to the Wayback Machine we can reveal what his website originally said,

"I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist" - John Cook, Skeptical Science



A link from the Skeptical Science "About" page originally went to his cartoonist page,

"John Cook: A cartoonist working from home in Brisbane, Australia" - SEV
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
You are being laughed at because the majority of the crap you regurgitate comes from an idiots website who has no education or credentials in the science field.

Get this through your tiny brain UncleBuck, he's a cartoonist and a blogger, skeptical science is counterfeit. hack website.
Click to expand...
so then it should be easy for you to disprove everything on his website then, right?

i mean, he's just a cartoonist and a blogger posting stuff from the george soros funded NASA, and you are way smarter than NASA and way smarter than a cartoonist. so surely you should be able to rebut everything on their site, right?

so then why don't you?

why instead do you make retarded claims about NASA that you refuse to cite and post falsified, unattributed graphs then?

and john cook has a degree in physics and post grad in solar physics. what's your degree in, running a failing construction business that can't compete with illegal immigrants with magnets on their vans?

:lol: still waiting for you to cite your NASA claims and attribute your falsified graph.
 
jahbrudda

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so then it should be easy for you to disprove everything on his website then, right?

.
Click to expand...
On the contrary, you and the government sponsored career scientists are making the claim of AGW, the burden of proof is on you loons. As it is you have 1 minute left in the fourth quarter, you're down 21-10 and you're backed up to your own 5 yard line.

good luck.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
jahbrudda said:
On the contrary, you and the government sponsored career scientists are making the claim of AGW, the burden of proof is on you loons.
Click to expand...

goddamn you are insufferably stupid.

in the 1980s, hansen made some projections. over the next 30+ years, we compared those projections to the observations.

it looks like this:



there is no need to prove anything here. hansen modeled his climate predictions and contrasted them with observations. skeptical science posted it on their website.

so there is no burden of proof on me to do anything.

the only burden of proof now is on you. if you claim that this is bullshit and that skeptical science is bullshit and that NASA is a soros funded conspiracy and NASA has called 95% of their own models wrong, then the burden of proof is on you to show us why. we are not making those retarded conspiracy theory claims, you are. so the burden is on you to support your own claims.

and i'm still waiting for you to cite your NASA claim and attribute your falsified graph.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i guess beenthere is not gonna bother trying to cite his NASA conspiracy theory claims or attribute his falsified graph.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top