Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
Like Tree7Likes
Newbie Central

MH vs HPS

in the

The Grow Room

forums; Im currently vegging under a 400 w HPS, i know there is a reason people veg under MH and i ...
  1. #1
    420 TIME Stoner Tranceus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012

    Posts
    669
    Journal Entries
    6

    Default MH vs HPS

    Im currently vegging under a 400 w HPS, i know there is a reason people veg under MH and i know i should get one but my question is how much faster will my plants veg under this 400w mh than the hps and is it worth it to buy one?
    MY 1st hydroponics journal check it out! http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...ml#post7732068

  2. #2
    420 TIME Stoner
    Join Date
    Jun 2009

    Posts
    602

    Default

    They will be taller and strtchier under the hps for veg, VS smaller and bushier under mh

    If your running mostly indica strains or hydrids it doesnt really matter sativas you would
    have to lst basically tie the branches around the pot.
    smokin sticky sticky
    Quote Originally Posted by ditrtyone View Post
    just added a pic of the hairy balls.

  3. #3
    Ursus marijanus Mr. Ganja cannabineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011

    Location
    Rednekistan
    Posts
    31,256

    Default

    OK this is the foundation.


    Here's an HPS spectrum (Hortilux) against their somewhat different plant response spectrum. Note the severe deficiency in blue light.



    Here's a 400 MH. Spiky but good red/blue ratio for veg.



    A Hortilux 1000. i don't know if I believe the radically better fill-in relative to a 400 generic. cn



    My conclusion: MH is much superior for veg. cn
    "My god ... it's full of stars!" - David Bowman
    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    Are you suggesting my goal in debate should be to lose?
    neerGreen 2: Soilless grow
    Quote Originally Posted by Moldy View Post
    I swear to god that I'm an atheist.

  4. #4
    Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja Warlock1369's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011

    Location
    in the great state of NonYa
    Posts
    3,670

    Default

    It's worth it. The spectrum of the mh imitates spring and erly summer. You will see it as a blueish white. While hps is more red. Late summer and fall. This works with the photo period of the plants. growth won't be that noticeable but when flowering stretch comes you will see how healthy the plants where. But you can use ether mh or hps the full grow. Me personally I have 2 1000s and a 600 in my flower room. So I switch lights like summer dose. First week of flower all mh. Next week or 2 hps in the 600. Then hps in the 2 1000's and mh in the 600. Last 3-4 weeks is all hps. I'm to cheap to get dual spectrum bulbs. I just switch.

  5. #5
    Ganja Smoker Pot Head
    Join Date
    Jun 2012

    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie, MI
    Posts
    285

    Default

    a few years ago i always read to veg with a mh and flower with hps. several grows i did exactly that with a 400 watt in a 5x5 tent. awesome results by the way. i ended up upgrading to a 600 watt system. only had a 600w hps. i am able to dim my ballast to save on the electric bill and/or reduce heat. i turned it down to 400 for veg. from what i seen the hps did even better. i cant really say for sure because it wasnt like 2 grows done side by side so its hard to give it a real fair comparison because other variables like temps could have been different. ever since then i only veg with a hps though. it seemed faster and the leaves seemed to get bigger. nodes were even a bit tighter. mh does have a better spectrum for foliage. but the hps has more lumens per watt. imo i like hps better but would be cool to see someone do a side by side with identical conditions.
    SimonD likes this.

  6. #6
    Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja drolove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011

    Location
    where the grass is greener
    Posts
    4,324
    Journal Entries
    33

    Default

    i have no choice with my perpetual 12/12 from a seed grow....damn it lol

  7. #7
    420 TIME Stoner Tranceus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012

    Posts
    669
    Journal Entries
    6

    Default

    i think im going to get a mh for veg, im only growing them to 12 inches before i induce flower due to the fact that i am in a dwc system that is 18 inches tall and i only have 6'5 from floor to roof. im growing 40 plants sog style so i dont have much room and i have 2 600w and a 400w, im even thinking of using the 400w mh that i veg with in the middle of the 2 600w i have with them pushing hps for a good spectrum of light for flowering. but im def getting that mh for vegging. thanks for the info and charts canna you have been a huge help from the start man. your great
    MY 1st hydroponics journal check it out! http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...ml#post7732068

  8. #8
    420 TIME Stoner KAL EL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009

    Location
    Smallville
    Posts
    497

    Default

    You can veg under hps just fine especially if you are in dwc. the veg time is so short to get a 12 inch plant that you dont need to bother with a mh.
    Tranceus likes this.
    An expert is someone that learns more and more about less and less, and eventually knows everything about nothing.


  9. #9
    420 TIME Stoner Tranceus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012

    Posts
    669
    Journal Entries
    6

    Default

    my friend you have been a good help within the past few minutes lol.
    MY 1st hydroponics journal check it out! http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journal...ml#post7732068

  10. #10
    420 TIME Stoner SimonD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011

    Posts
    671

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beer316 View Post
    a few years ago i always read to veg with a mh and flower with hps. several grows i did exactly that with a 400 watt in a 5x5 tent. awesome results by the way. i ended up upgrading to a 600 watt system. only had a 600w hps. i am able to dim my ballast to save on the electric bill and/or reduce heat. i turned it down to 400 for veg. from what i seen the hps did even better. i cant really say for sure because it wasnt like 2 grows done side by side so its hard to give it a real fair comparison because other variables like temps could have been different. ever since then i only veg with a hps though. it seemed faster and the leaves seemed to get bigger. nodes were even a bit tighter. mh does have a better spectrum for foliage. but the hps has more lumens per watt. imo i like hps better but would be cool to see someone do a side by side with identical conditions.
    My experience, as well (veg only), although I've run side-by-side, same everything, blah, blah, blah. I still try MHs on occasion, like last season when I tested a pair of Digilux 600MHs and saw the absolute slowest growth, ever, with HIDs. Frankly, Sylvania 400MHs were actually a bit better, but still no comparison.

    Simon
    Last edited by SimonD; 06-25-2012 at 01:21 AM.
    beer316 likes this.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •