sorry-
wrong thread.
not for you glad. for the buck.
Make the most of the Indian hemp seed, and sow it everywhere!-George Washington
oh... and who is going trigger happy anyways?
we all called for bans, locked threads for the longest time and all of a sudden they come in and lock it up because what??
the michigan forum became active again over the last couple months..
our bad.
those threads, beyond the name calling and run around from some... HE-WHO-SHOULD-NOT-BE-NAMED,
had a lot of good fucking discussion and information.
what we ought to do. is make a law sticky. with all the cases and shit.
hard facts. and we'll go from there?
turn this energy into something positive eh? (i'm neither a yooper, nor canadian in decent, i used "eh?" solely for inflection and style)
Jeesis christ.... I locked the motherfucker to let it rest... Here I'll go open it back up so you can all reminisce about bob, lmao. Fucking over react much? damn...
I wasn't overreacting?? I think it's just time to move on from bob... I think everyone had their say. I don't see a need to keep dwelling on him and talking shit about him whether true or not true, but maybe there is... carry on.
I took it as you lecturing us and shutting down a conversation that had no arguing.
It helps to know that you just want the Bob issue dead. There were several possible reasons that could have motivated you, I didn't buy you blaming us for arguing. I think I have agreed with everything you have said and done. Then last week or so you said you didn't give a fuck and barely logged in. Now are you just gonna be doing drive-bys or what.
It's like was this a bob thing, or every time you think there is a disagreement it will be shut down. That's what I was searching for. I use rollitup to avoid that shit. I don't want my PMs read and altered and blocked, all that bullshit I hear about other sites. Rollitup has been bad ass, don't want that to change.
Bring Bob back, is he really banned? WTF?
Glad, it was going back and forth about bob being a paid informant, another person was denying he was etc.. It wasn't really arguing, my point was to let the issue rest. You should know I don't close threads for arguing by now..
Bookmarks