Well hello again. Looking forward to another day of alarmism at our current atmospheric co2 saturation of 380 without you stating what the ideal saturation is.
The off topic tangents are the goal, make no mistake about it. It is endless. The only way to win that game is not to play it and just stay on topic and gloss over the distractions.
Your government is here to help you. I have "free" rehab for you when you are ready. I wish you all would hurry up and vote socialist because then I could just force you to rehab for the greater good but for now I am waiting on you to choose help that I can pay for with your future goods and...
It's like Lord of the flies but on a sub forum that no one gives a shit about but the ones here are interested in banishing some of the few who want to participate.
Lol that's cray.
Your outdoor plants are in an all time historic co2 defecit, you can't tell me what percentage of climate change is attributed to humans or what atmospheric co2 saturation is ideal for earf and you have excluded me from the "97%" like some kind of scientologist or Jehovah's witness. Now you...
That two pump must have cut you deep for you to keep that up. A quick site search confirms it:
I can say with all honesty that none of those other 4 members you referenced as Two pump are me and I just stopped there because Jesus Christ that's a sad read watching you go on and on like that...
Keep seeing the boogeyman travis, this is all readily available information.
In a thread titled "introduction to tcp" John cook layed out his marketing plan for the 97% consensus before the research was even started.
It's pure bunk.
Any position that disagrees with you by an actual scientist is included in the 97% consensus. All climate scientist, even your so called "deniers" agree that humans are affecting the climate. That is what includes them in cooks consensus. The debate is to what degree are humans contributing...
Yeah sure OR an actual scientist testing a hypothesis before drawing a conclusion. So what's the ideal saturation of co2 in the atmosphere if you are settled on the science that our current 380 is just so darned unacceptable?
Still waiting.