Recent content by poptech

Let me know when you can actually support one of your climate related arguments. Everyone can read how you avoided each one and then resorted to reporting them as spam.

How does it feel to lose a debate so bad like this?

I've already proven that your statement in relation to scientific organizations is meaningless as it does not represent the membership bodies. Policy statements release by the council members or signed by just the president of a scientific organization can speak for no one other than the...

Why can you not answer simple questions? How many scientists? 10, 100....? This is getting rather embarrassing for you as it is clear you are used to throwing around bullshit statements you cannot back up. Why are you so uneducated on this issue?

How many scientists? 10, 100...?

How many scientists is that? I am well aware they all accept "climate change", everyone believes the climate changes.

You failing to support your arguments has nothing to do with me. You cannot back ANYTHING up. You cannot even provide the following and just spew ad hominems, 1. Please provide the objective criteria for determining who is a "climatologist". 2. Please provide a comprehensive survey or...

I went back and reported all your actual spam. Too bad you cannot actually debate.

Why can you not debate the facts UncleBuck? Why can you not support any of your nonsensical arguments? Everyone reading this can clearly see you failed. Pure irony, the spammer, reporting spam.

Hillarious, the ad hominem spammer reporting someone else because they cannot support their arguments.

You have yet to actually present a position of mine that is not a strawman argument. Now, 1. Please provide the objective criteria for determining who is a "climatologist". 2. Please provide a comprehensive survey or poll of any of those scientific organization's membership bodies in support...

Fact: you cannot debate the facts and instead resort to ad hominem, strawman and red herring arguments. Now, 1. Please provide the objective criteria for determining who is a "climatologist". 2. Please provide a comprehensive survey or poll of any of those scientific organization's membership...

You continue to argue a topic and position that you are clearly uneducated on. 1. Please provide the objective criteria for determining who is a "climatologist". 2. Please provide a comprehensive survey or poll of any of those scientific organization's membership bodies in support of the...

Continued ad hominem, strawman arguments and red herrings. Yet you failed to provide the following, 1. Please provide the objective criteria for determining who is a "climatologist". 2. Please provide a comprehensive survey or poll of any of those scientific organization's membership bodies in...

It is not remotely settled. Please provide a comprehensive survey or poll of those scientific organization's membership bodies in support of the position statements released by a handful of their council members or in many cases signed just by the president. Failure to do so discredits your...