The hearing has been delayed and probably will be rescheduled in June. See this link for info.
https://app.e2ma.net/app/view:Campai...b0ab49abcaa826

Thanks everyone,
pp69

Actually, I think it is a GOOD thing if the change is made. This means that there will be MORE Cannabis growers , and that is a good thing....

Could you please explain how limiting a CG to 5 patients will mean more growers? Not being disrespectful but there are so many disabled patients that can't grow their own for any number of reasons that putting a limit will drive prices higher and make it harder to find. That is only my opinion but damn.
Would you limit how many people can shop at a grocery store, and if you did, wouldn't that potentially drive the prices up for any number of reasons?
Let the patients and CG monitor themselves and they will weed out the bad apples.

pp69

SEEMS PRETTY OBVIOUS , THAT IF YOU HAVE SAY 100 MM PATIENTS AND ONLY ONE GROWER IS ALLOWED FOR EVERY 5 CUSTOMERS, THOSE OTHER 95 MM PATIENTS WILL HAVE TO FIND PROVIDERS ( GROWERS ) THEREFORE MORE GROWERS...

First of all Thanks for yelling.
Next, just because you limit the number of patients per CG does Not mean that a bunch of people will step up and become growers. If they could grow, they would already be doing it.
Let the patients and Cgers monitor themselves. In other words, if a patient is being done wrong,they can now go to another CG, but if you place limits then they may not have a choice of a CGer. You don't create more growers by limiting how many patients they can have.

Have a good Day,
pp69

__________________
I'm not a Gynecologists, but I'll take a look!

Co. Med patient and Caregiver!

[quote=pikes peak 69;2189477]First of all Thanks for yelling.
Next, just because you limit the number of patients per CG does Not mean that a bunch of people will step up and become growers. If they could grow, they would already be doing it.
Let the patients and Cgers monitor themselves. In other words, if a patient is being done wrong,they can now go to another CG, but if you place limits then they may not have a choice of a CGer. You don't create more growers by limiting how many patients they can have.

Have a good Day,


SHIT, I JUST ASSUMED THAT THERE WAS A UNLIMITED MARKET FOR GROWERS, MY BAD.
YELLING?, THIS IS YELLING...>>>>>>>> I NEED TO ADD MORE ,BUT WILL HAVE LESS.

From what I was told that when you are A grower you can not sell or take contributions for your work! How true that is I don't know! I know they were talking about raising the limit of how much you can have on hand for each patient.

__________________
Note: Any involvement in illegal activities expressed and/or implied by my communications in this forum are untrue and solely intended for entertainment purposes only.

The wife and I are watching the developments very very closely. We are 99.999999% sure we will open up a little mom and pop dispensary, and we are really rooting for Colorado to be our new home state.

Allowing regulated Capitalism to work its magic is what is best for patients, caregivers, and ultimately the state. Competition breeds better product, keeps prices low(er), and ultimately everyone is happy.

Neither one of these statements is true for the State of Colorado. As a grower,really called a caregiver, you can sell to any other card holding patient. The state has never mentioned anything about changing, for the good or bad, any quantity levels. The law currently does state that "whatever is medically necessary".

pp69

__________________
I'm not a Gynecologists, but I'll take a look!

Co. Med patient and Caregiver!

They are trying to limit the amount of patients a single caregiver can serve. There was no previous limit written into the MMJ law. Also trying to implement rules that would obligate caregivers to have a more pro-active relationship with patients. For example arranging rides to and from thier appts. and things of that nature. The thing is the dispensary (caregiver) is nothing more than a pharmacy licensed by being the individual patients assigned caregiver to dispense medical marijuana to that patient and any others who have assigned them to be thier caregiver. The actual license has a space on it declaring who the caregiver is. Entitling that person to cultivate for, sell to, or posess for that patient. It is right in the law. Any way they are not limiting the amount of people a given pharmacist at King Soopers can serve, and the drugs they dispense actually kill people.It should be a right of the patient to choose who thier caregiver should be regardless of how many other patients the caregiver serves. The burden is on the caregiver to provide the medicine to the patient and if they take on more than they can handle or have crappy service because they can't handle the volume, well that's where competition would come in.