
07-16-2007, 01:24 PM
|  | Ganja Smoker Pot Head | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 218
| | free the weed petition.... | |
__________________  give a man a half, he smokes for a day
Teach a man to grow, he smokes forever! | 
07-17-2007, 05:05 AM
|  | Veteran Smoker Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: UK
Posts: 1,904
| | i doubt that will do anything.
they will take a look at it and go "hahahha, bin it" | 
07-17-2007, 05:10 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: vijzelstraat
Posts: 4,752
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cnl491 | I'm not going to sign to legalise it, this would mean tax being put on it, and lots of other government costs so they get their share. | 
07-17-2007, 05:14 AM
| | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,742
| | sign it anyway, what's it going to hurt?
just give false info  | 
07-18-2007, 09:09 AM
|  | Stoner Stoner | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: in a shake enbetween bum fuck n you got a pretty mouth
Posts: 974
| | I think when weed is made legal It will be at coffee shops where they could/will tax it, but as for growing at home i think it would be just like alchol/beer you can make your own but you try to sell they bust you. the governemt can't tax you on growing tomattos peppers tobacco they can tax and will you on selling it.  But it might not keep them from tring but Norml has got an eye for that.
__________________ Remember, Stupid Hurts! | 
07-18-2007, 09:14 AM
|  | Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: vijzelstraat
Posts: 4,752
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Token I think when weed is made legal It will be at coffee shops where they could/will tax it, but as for growing at home i think it would be just like alchol/beer you can make your own but you try to sell they bust you. the governemt can't tax you on growing tomattos peppers tobacco they can tax and will you on selling it.  But it might not keep them from tring but Norml has got an eye for that. | What is the score with tobacco, tobacco is legal right, but to grow it, probably not. You would probably have to pay to be able to get your license to grow.
The only time it will become comletely legal is when the government is happy that they will make their share of it.
I dont get it myself its just a plant ffs, all this fuss over a plant. Its not like human kind created it, it was here before us in some way or another. | 
07-18-2007, 09:30 AM
|  | Stoner Stoner | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: in a shake enbetween bum fuck n you got a pretty mouth
Posts: 974
| | Maybe i just thought about what nixon did, with the drug act he put in effect classifing each drug and giving them rules and rugulations.
__________________ Remember, Stupid Hurts! | 
07-19-2007, 04:54 AM
|  | Marijuana Toker Marijuana Toker | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Atlanta Ga
Posts: 145
| | There is a huge process involved in making weed legal to the point of public sale the first and Most Important step is for the FDA and the American Pharmalogical society (which is not an organization to my knowledge just a term used to identify pharmacies and drug companies as a whole) to re-class it. It is currently a Class1 Narcotic which means it is a drug with a heavy potential for abuse and serves no medical purpose.( which has already been disproven countless times) the tablet and capsule form (IE marinol, drobinal) Is a Class2 Narcotic which means the potential for abuse is there but so are some medical purposes other class2's are drugs like Lortab's, Percocets, and Xanex. Cocaine and heroin are class1 Narcotics If norml would stop petitioning congress and LEO agencies to legalize it and start pushing the FDA to re-class it say with tobacco or maybe even over the counter meds they would effectively remove the power from the Feds and all law enforcement for that matter to do anything at all about it. I support norml and other similar groups but they are going about it the wrong way the FDA reclasses drugs all the time which is why certain drugs are easier to get prescriptions for than they were say 10 years ago. if it were reclassed then Federal laws would be much easier to change because they would no longer serve a purpose why would something the FDA deems as safe and non addictive be illegal to posses?
__________________
Because this is the internet and I could tell everyone I was the Queen of England and provide pictures and no one would know the truth, none of what I claim on this forum is admissible as evidence in court nor is it grounds for any kind of warrent -TPG
| 
07-19-2007, 04:49 PM
|  | Teaching How To Roll Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,259
| | maybe we should concentrate on electing public officials who are sick and are good candidates for medical marijuana. | 
07-19-2007, 06:37 PM
|  | Just some idiot Mr. Ganja | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,438
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatPirateGuy There is a huge process involved in making weed legal to the point of public sale the first and Most Important step is for the FDA and the American Pharmalogical society (which is not an organization to my knowledge just a term used to identify pharmacies and drug companies as a whole) to re-class it. It is currently a Class1 Narcotic which means it is a drug with a heavy potential for abuse and serves no medical purpose.( which has already been disproven countless times) the tablet and capsule form (IE marinol, drobinal) Is a Class2 Narcotic which means the potential for abuse is there but so are some medical purposes other class2's are drugs like Lortab's, Percocets, and Xanex. Cocaine and heroin are class1 Narcotics If norml would stop petitioning congress and LEO agencies to legalize it and start pushing the FDA to re-class it say with tobacco or maybe even over the counter meds they would effectively remove the power from the Feds and all law enforcement for that matter to do anything at all about it. I support norml and other similar groups but they are going about it the wrong way the FDA reclasses drugs all the time which is why certain drugs are easier to get prescriptions for than they were say 10 years ago. if it were reclassed then Federal laws would be much easier to change because they would no longer serve a purpose why would something the FDA deems as safe and non addictive be illegal to posses? | Good point but who runs the FDA? The gov't right? I could be wrong but that is what I thought. I wish I could believe the reclassification thing but it would never fly. The common non-smoker isn't really informed like us. Some of them believe the hype. As for cocaine, did you know they use it in medical procedures? It's all about the dollar IMO, just my opinion. Why would the gov't legalize it when the guys with the money make synthetic THC (pharma. companies). | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | Come Check out a new Poker Forum for the online poker community All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:21 PM.
Page generated in 0.28660 seconds with 12 queries |