Growing & actual Laws, etc., is a Hobby. Anybody here actually KNOW about acting under color of law, separation of powers,Legislate Intent, etc ???
It would be nice to hear from somebody (else) that understands the working procedures. I'm not asking for legal help.

I have no legal credentials but I have read many times the sections of the U.S.C. and the code for my state that pertain to laws for marijuana and punishment for breaking those laws, for the purposes of self-edification. I have also read as many court-opinions as I could find that have defined the application and constitutional viability of these laws.

I have no metals or any pre-set government dance steps to show I know shit. Your State, my State, within the US., what is the utmost regulator that assures that each Citizen is treated as the right to all Citizen's. Can't say that your State offers a right to a person's livelihood, when another States does not. So why is that possible ??

quote=bradlyallen2;1837760]I have no legal credentials but I have read many times the sections of the U.S.C. and the code for my state that pertain to laws for marijuana and punishment for breaking those laws, for the purposes of self-edification. I have also read as many court-opinions as I could find that have defined the application and constitutional viability of these laws.[/quote]

I'm not really sure what you are asking, but the ultimate authority in America the is the United States Constitution and the first ten amendments to the Constitution which are better known as the Bill of Rights.

__________________
My Grow: http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/77350-stealth-wardrobe-grow.html

Hell, I wrote it & don't understand the comment/question. What I am entertaining at the present is when any Law Official(s) violate the Right to Privacy on Posted, secured private property, without probable cause, immediate threat, or permission, then search & seize and /or damage personal property, make arrest, etc. I state that the officials committed the crimes of trespassing, felony theft while in possession of firearms, false imprisonment. Immunity from prosecution becomes void when the acts are not protected under color of law-lawful procedures. I believe the vehicles used to commit felony theft should also be seized. This is not to mention civil suit. IAD report also is a must. This is all coming up. "It ain't no fun when the Rabbit gets the gun".
quote=Picasso345;1857515]I'm not really sure what you are asking, but the ultimate authority in America the is the United States Constitution and the first ten amendments to the Constitution which are better known as the Bill of Rights.[/quote]

Seriously, I can help you with Legislative Intent because I do have experience in that area.

__________________
Screw organized crime. Grow yer own damn weed!



Don't Talk to Police

Proud member of NORML

Don't need any help, just like discussing the shit, like growing. I wish I had a full blown law library, just for fun. But..., here is a legal question that I would love to find a case site on. When Officers manipulate a locking devise used to secure entry onto post, private property, without any probable cause, no immediate threat or invitation, to "stumble" upon my Ladies, which killing my Ladies & Babies, taking my grow shit, etc, and cuffing & confining until I paid a ransom (bail), my legal contention is;
Because the Officers was not under the protection of Color of Law, the Criminal Offenses committed goes as follows. Trespassing, theft & destruction of private property over $5,000., a felony, and the possession of firearms while committing offense, unlawful arrest, illegal confinement. Also, the vehicles used while committing this felony offense should be seized. I'll take the vehicles in lieu of destroyed property. Equal Protection, they can take our vehicles, why can't I take theirs? One of the vehicles used was actually taken from a drug bust. A fucking Charger. I want that car. ?????

Trying to pierce the color of law protection is a VERY tough nut to crack. You need extraordinary evidence that is pretty incontrovertible to climb that mountain.

I would be inclined to forget about all the that and forget about seizing their vehicles, etc. A fun pipe dream, but unless you have them on videotape confessing I can't see it happening.

Why not stick with a garden variety civil rights violation? Much more winnable in my opinion and you get money. Cash is king, you can buy a garage full of Chargers that haven't been driven to shit by cops.

Just my two cents. I'm no attorney, but I've spent time around the system.

__________________
My Grow: http://www.rollitup.org/grow-journals/77350-stealth-wardrobe-grow.html

Well, of course your dammed right. Each case gets muddied real quick. So average avenues is the norm. But, (here it comes), however, the interesting thing about "color of Law" here is when ask the authority to step foot on private property, and EVERYTHING pivots on the legality of that first step on PP, response was, the gate wasn't padlocked, although it was posted- No Tress, etc, secured by spring loaded mechanical locking device. Entry could have been via wire cutters, since the fence don't have padlocks on it, or the Wifes chastity belt was unlocked is grounds for rape. That's what the Bitch will have to admit in Court. Forget the car shit..., The whole question is was the fruit gathered from a fruited or unbarren tree. There is only 4 reasons for the Bitch to step foot.., Plain sight, probable cause, immediate threat, or invitation. That shit don't fly about because your front door wasn't lock, entry gate was able to be manipulated, as cutting a fence line. He called Sheriff. Sheriff seen 15 Ladies outside my front door, house was NOT locked, and He still drove 50 mile round trip for warrant, which I insisted to document that He would not open an unlock door with warrant, when His Bitch's sole defense is the gate wasn't pad locked without knowing shit. It cost me about 10 grand, plus. I'll be assigned "Counsel at Standing", to begin with, and go/play from there. One of my Ladies was a clone, rejuvenated twice, own Her third harvest. Plus 4,000 seeds, etc. I'm just Pissed. Thanks for the input, I love legal debate.