LED UFO - Lighthouse Hydro 90w 2010 6-band HO UFO Model

Dr.RR

Active Member
I made a thread yesterday about which LED UFO to get. I didn't really get my answer and I am still stuck on this one. What do people know about Lighthouse Hydro? Are there any 90w UFO users that use the Lighthouse Hydro brand?

I am interested in purchasing this new 2010 model they are advertising. Supposedly it's a HO model with 6-band. They advertise it avergaing around 16,000 lumens versus other LED UFO's which emit only ~ 4,000 lumens. Now I know lumens aren't everything but would this actually make a difference to the other LED UFO's that are out there?

Also - Ultraviolet and IR?? Any side-effects from this or do the plants really use it?

Here's the link to the unit - http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-2010-model-90w-HO-Cree-Lighthouse-Hydro-6-Band-USA_W0QQitemZ270507614875QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item3efb82a29b
 

GypsyBush

Well-Known Member
I OBJECTFY!!!...lol....:clap:

You got a 400w HPS and you're looking at LEDs?????:shock:

Why???

HPS has more "electrolytes"...:eyesmoke:

...

Blah blah blah... you gotta believe me!...:eyesmoke:



:joint::peace:

[youtube]y0O7_3o3BrI[/youtube]
 

Dr.RR

Active Member
I OBJECTFY!!!...lol....:clap:

You got a 400w HPS and you're looking at LEDs?????:shock:

Why???

HPS has more "electrolytes"...:eyesmoke:

...

Blah blah blah... you gotta believe me!...:eyesmoke:



:joint::peace:

[youtube]y0O7_3o3BrI[/youtube]

Omg lmao. I'm keeping my 400W HPS to flower in one room, but I'd like to replace my 8-bulb T5 fixture with a 90W UFO unit. I can't control the fluctuation of temps and the veg room gets very hot with the T5's (95+).
 

GypsyBush

Well-Known Member
Gotcha! :eyesmoke:

Real LEDs get hot too...

If HEAT is the issue, I would look into a smaller HID (150w~250) in a cooltube...

A single heat source is easier to isolate than multiple sources, like T-5s or LEDs...

Makes sure you compare cost too, they are not cheap...

But go with what you know...:razz: and best of luck....

:joint::peace:
 

Dr.RR

Active Member
Gotcha! :eyesmoke:

Real LEDs get hot too...

If HEAT is the issue, I would look into a smaller HID (150w~250) in a cooltube...

A single heat source is easier to isolate than multiple sources, like T-5s or LEDs...

Makes sure you compare cost too, they are not cheap...

But go with what you know...:razz: and best of luck....

:joint::peace:
I can't really be messing around with Cooltubes and all the fancy ventilation where I live. I'd like to give the LED's a shot since I've seen a couple grows on here now and they seem to do pretty darn good for the veg state. I just hope some LED users can help answer my original question about the unit I'm thinking of getting.
 

ThaiBoy

Member
I can't really be messing around with Cooltubes and all the fancy ventilation where I live. I'd like to give the LED's a shot since I've seen a couple grows on here now and they seem to do pretty darn good for the veg state. I just hope some LED users can help answer my original question about the unit I'm thinking of getting.
I own the 90w 2009 LightHouse Hydr 90w LED Grow Light and have just ordered a 2010 model. I think they are best in there class and have gotten good veg. results thus far.

Lumens are not everything and is based on how well a human eyeball can detect light, not how well a plant can use the light to grow. To plants, certain wavelengths are more useful than others for growth. That's why LED grow light manufactures try to blend different color LEDs to get a complex spectrum. The 2010 model gets closer to the spectrum of pure sunlight better than other LED lights through LED blending. The 2009 model has just two colors, red and blue, but the two colors were picked because they are the peaks of photosynthesis action spectrum. It is unknown which light will do better for growth and Gotham Hydro is currently testing the lights on tomato growth.

Here's a quote from an e-mail from Gotham Hydro who distributes the LightHouse Hydro lights describing the advantages of the 2010 model and:

"Well lumens/watt is one thing, the other is lumens/wavelength. At the
moment, pound for pound or lumen for lumen, it is easier to get more red
than blue lumens out of an LED. Now we find that evolutions in the white HO
LED actually produce more blue than blue LED's. The action spectrum is an
study on the rate of photosynthesis (measured by O2 production) when
exposed to particular wavelengths. Thus it is very accurate. The rate i \s
influenced by the active usable wavelengths of chlorophyll (there are 3
actually) as well as the absorption spectrum (i.e. reflectivity) of plants
as well. Needless to say it is an important graph. Matching it may or may
not be important but it is very useful in determining the "efficiency" of a
light or artificial light.

That said, for years many have known that "Blue" wavelengths promote veg
stages and "reds" are more important for flowering, although I am egar to
see how with the introduction of LED's those "colors" can be tweaked to
possibly increase yield under artificial light. I would love to have about
50 of these lights and 50 identical clones and have at it for a year or so.
We are testing tomatoes now in the UV vs. HO White now, I will let you know
the results in about 90 days."

Here's another quote describing the 2010 light and speculating on how to use both the 2009 and 2010 model lights:

"Now to answer your question. It [2010 model] matches the action spectrum almost
PERFECTLY. At least it matches the blue and red peaks in the same ratio
(about 50%/50%. Hence the ratio of HO white vs red. The whites actually put
out more blue than blue LED's do, hence the switch to white HO LED's. There
is an excess of light in the blue to orange wavelengths. The main purpose
of the HO whites are for the Blue (100% efficient) it contributes also to
the mid-range 500nm-600nm (20% efficiency) as well as the red (76%
Efficiency).

Breakdown is as follows (Usable Lumens per LED): Efficiency had been
calculated for.

White Cree HO Warm: Blue 22 Lumens, Middle 20 lumens, Red 8 Lumens
White Cree HO Cool: Blue 33 Lumens, Middle 13 lumens, Red 5 Lumens
Cree 660nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 18 Lumens
Cree 630nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 30 Lumens

From there is it math. Compared with a standard Gro Pro UFO Blue/Red Model

Bridgelux Blue 460nm: Blue 10 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 0 Lumens
Bridgelux Red 660nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 8 Lumens

Now compared with the Lighthouse UV [2009 model]

Cree 660nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 18 Lumens
Cree 425nm: Blue 15 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 0 Lumens

So there is the numbers.
Keep in mind that the coverage on this new one. Id not quite as good as the
UV model. You want to cover no more than 4sqft with this white HO in SOG or
ScrOG growing method.

So.. these new HO are awesome for Veg and Cloning as they have way more
Blue than anything else. UV is nice for Late Veg / Early Flower and then
the last 2 weeks I would hit the plants with the HO again. I am curious to
see if the intensity of the HO will do more for yield than the Red of the
UV."

Note that Lumens are broken down to Blue, Middle, and Red and are not a good description of the full spectrum of the light. Having more high output (HO) white LEDs will certainly boost boost eyeball lumens, but the effects on growth are not known and are currently under study. My guess is that the 2010 light will out perform the 2009 overall and is the best UFO style 90w light available at the present time!

Oh yeah, I don't think the IR and UV light put out by the LightHouse Hydro LED grow lights is not harmful to people and much appreciated by the plants! On the other hand, I think the unfiltered spectrum of a HP or MH light can be detrimental if given enough exposure...

-ThaiBoy
 

Dr.RR

Active Member
I own the 90w 2009 LightHouse Hydr 90w LED Grow Light and have just ordered a 2010 model. I think they are best in there class and have gotten good veg. results thus far.

Lumens are not everything and is based on how well a human eyeball can detect light, not how well a plant can use the light to grow. To plants, certain wavelengths are more useful than others for growth. That's why LED grow light manufactures try to blend different color LEDs to get a complex spectrum. The 2010 model gets closer to the spectrum of pure sunlight better than other LED lights through LED blending. The 2009 model has just two colors, red and blue, but the two colors were picked because they are the peaks of photosynthesis action spectrum. It is unknown which light will do better for growth and Gotham Hydro is currently testing the lights on tomato growth.

Here's a quote from an e-mail from Gotham Hydro who distributes the LightHouse Hydro lights describing the advantages of the 2010 model and:

"Well lumens/watt is one thing, the other is lumens/wavelength. At the
moment, pound for pound or lumen for lumen, it is easier to get more red
than blue lumens out of an LED. Now we find that evolutions in the white HO
LED actually produce more blue than blue LED's. The action spectrum is an
study on the rate of photosynthesis (measured by O2 production) when
exposed to particular wavelengths. Thus it is very accurate. The rate i \s
influenced by the active usable wavelengths of chlorophyll (there are 3
actually) as well as the absorption spectrum (i.e. reflectivity) of plants
as well. Needless to say it is an important graph. Matching it may or may
not be important but it is very useful in determining the "efficiency" of a
light or artificial light.

That said, for years many have known that "Blue" wavelengths promote veg
stages and "reds" are more important for flowering, although I am egar to
see how with the introduction of LED's those "colors" can be tweaked to
possibly increase yield under artificial light. I would love to have about
50 of these lights and 50 identical clones and have at it for a year or so.
We are testing tomatoes now in the UV vs. HO White now, I will let you know
the results in about 90 days."

Here's another quote describing the 2010 light and speculating on how to use both the 2009 and 2010 model lights:

"Now to answer your question. It [2010 model] matches the action spectrum almost
PERFECTLY. At least it matches the blue and red peaks in the same ratio
(about 50%/50%. Hence the ratio of HO white vs red. The whites actually put
out more blue than blue LED's do, hence the switch to white HO LED's. There
is an excess of light in the blue to orange wavelengths. The main purpose
of the HO whites are for the Blue (100% efficient) it contributes also to
the mid-range 500nm-600nm (20% efficiency) as well as the red (76%
Efficiency).

Breakdown is as follows (Usable Lumens per LED): Efficiency had been
calculated for.

White Cree HO Warm: Blue 22 Lumens, Middle 20 lumens, Red 8 Lumens
White Cree HO Cool: Blue 33 Lumens, Middle 13 lumens, Red 5 Lumens
Cree 660nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 18 Lumens
Cree 630nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 30 Lumens

From there is it math. Compared with a standard Gro Pro UFO Blue/Red Model

Bridgelux Blue 460nm: Blue 10 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 0 Lumens
Bridgelux Red 660nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 8 Lumens

Now compared with the Lighthouse UV [2009 model]

Cree 660nm: Blue 0 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 18 Lumens
Cree 425nm: Blue 15 Lumens, Middle 0 Lumens, Red 0 Lumens

So there is the numbers.
Keep in mind that the coverage on this new one. Id not quite as good as the
UV model. You want to cover no more than 4sqft with this white HO in SOG or
ScrOG growing method.

So.. these new HO are awesome for Veg and Cloning as they have way more
Blue than anything else. UV is nice for Late Veg / Early Flower and then
the last 2 weeks I would hit the plants with the HO again. I am curious to
see if the intensity of the HO will do more for yield than the Red of the
UV."

Note that Lumens are broken down to Blue, Middle, and Red and are not a good description of the full spectrum of the light. Having more high output (HO) white LEDs will certainly boost boost eyeball lumens, but the effects on growth are not known and are currently under study. My guess is that the 2010 light will out perform the 2009 overall and is the best UFO style 90w light available at the present time!

Oh yeah, I don't think the IR and UV light put out by the LightHouse Hydro LED grow lights is not harmful to people and much appreciated by the plants! On the other hand, I think the unfiltered spectrum of a HP or MH light can be detrimental if given enough exposure...

-ThaiBoy

Hmm, some really interesting stuff there ThaiBoy, thank you. I must ask though, are you a sales rep? Just seems leery to me that this was your first post and yet have so much details about their company.

Since you've used to 90w 2009 model, care to share any photos of your grows? How is the 2009 model for vegging only?
 

ThaiBoy

Member
Hmm, some really interesting stuff there ThaiBoy, thank you. I must ask though, are you a sales rep? Just seems leery to me that this was your first post and yet have so much details about their company.

Since you've used to 90w 2009 model, care to share any photos of your grows? How is the 2009 model for vegging only?
No. I'm not a sales rep. Just a grower who recently did a butt load of research before committing to LED grow lights this time around. I wanted the best LED light I could get my hands on. After buying the Lighthouse 2009 model from Gotham Hydroponics, I started an e-mail correspondence with them. In those e-mails they gave me some very detailed information about their products. I figured it would be in the interest of all to share that knowledge (they did not tell me to keep it a secret). They did ask if I wanted to make a video promoting their product on YouTube in exchange for a good deal on the next light I buy from them. Thus far, however, I'm strictly an enthusiastic consumer of their products and have not profited in any way from endorsing their stuff.

As for photos, I wish I had taken some during the first four weeks when my clones were growing in soil. I, and other growers were quite impressed. Unfortunately, when I switched to hydroponics, I made some big Ph and nutrient mistakes, and then went on Xmas vacation! My young (5 week old) plants nearly died. I came back to a Ph of 8.6 and an EC of about 2.2. I corrected those problems and my plants are now growing rapidly again. I'll consider some posting some pictures when my plants fully recover...

-ThaiBoy
 

indoorsavant

Active Member
I made a thread yesterday about which LED UFO to get. I didn't really get my answer and I am still stuck on this one. What do people know about Lighthouse Hydro? Are there any 90w UFO users that use the Lighthouse Hydro brand?

I am interested in purchasing this new 2010 model they are advertising. Supposedly it's a HO model with 6-band. They advertise it avergaing around 16,000 lumens versus other LED UFO's which emit only ~ 4,000 lumens. Now I know lumens aren't everything but would this actually make a difference to the other LED UFO's that are out there?

Also - Ultraviolet and IR?? Any side-effects from this or do the plants really use it?

Here's the link to the unit - http://cgi.ebay.com/NEW-2010-model-90w-HO-Cree-Lighthouse-Hydro-6-Band-USA_W0QQitemZ270507614875QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item3efb82a29b
hey man i also use a 90w from lighthouse and gotham.i think they are great.i just harvested my NL and the smoke is prime.buds arnt huge but ok.i do have to say that you need to find a strain that performs well under leds.mango is by far the biggest budder under my 90w,followed by cyber crystal.i started a grow journal a while back but got lazy.i will update it with picks of my big nugs.honestly i was kinda skeptical about them too.sean their rep called me at home after my purchase to see if i was happy though.i liked that(and didnt)their youtube video explains it man.the new ones put out a great deal of lumens.but the uv models are superior to the other makes available.dont buy the 90 ho until the 3rd week of jan.then they will have a 120 degree angle available with the same coverage as the uv.thats what im waiting for sean will be calling me when they come in.i dont know man tey see to know what they are talking about.they also show facts to back up their product.only thing is that i can find 0 info on growboys magazine or lighthouse hydro.but if the ligt works who cares if they operate out of their garage lol.and i am getting good results.like their add says not quite a 400w hps.but around a 300w.the buds shine with crystals too.i think because of the uv light it stresses the plant into more thc production.ive done a lot of research on leds recently and i do like lighthouse...if i went with anyone else it would be htgsupply.com or groitled.com but they cost a lot more..atleast the lights have a label(the little lighthouse)that makes me feel better that they arnt just Chinese crap being re sold for a higher price..they also can get a 120 ho or uv.not sure what i will go with yet.i want two 90w or higher on my flowering plants.and my 50w for starting them/breeding in my tent.i am flowering a total of 7 full grown and 20 babys right now under the 90w and 50w on the babies a bit lower down,and they all are fucking ridiculous.and i switched from a 400w hps to the 90w uv.also keep in mind finding the right strain,the mango you cant go wrong. the cyber crystal isnt very potent but the bud is like 7 or 8 inches long,but if your just vegging you will be 100% satisfied with a 90w or higher.my 50w is good but the coverage is a little shy of the 90 so i wouldnt go that low if you have the choice(i got my 50w ufo for christmas from my fiance its good but if i bought it, it would have been a higher watt model.but shes a girl and doesnt know shit about growing just that i like the ufos lol.ill post pics..check my grow journal. 90w ufo closet i think is what i called it.its under indoorsavant:joint:
 

axjnkee

Well-Known Member
Well I dont know about the other companies, but have had very good luck with the LED's that Sunshine-Systems puts out.You also mite want to consider the Glowpanel45 if your just gonna use it for vegging, although they work awsome for flowering as well.
 

gonnagro

Well-Known Member
I am currently growing with 2 of the Litehouse 2009 winners, 3 14W panels for side light, and 2 46W CFL's in a cabinet. I am 8 weeks from seed. No complaints so far. I have one of the 2010 models also but the sheet you get when you order them says your better off flowering with the 2009 model.

I asked Sean about this and he said: "flower with the 2009 until the last three weeks then switch to the 2010 model and finish the grow."

Good luck with whatever you decide, as this is my first grow and thats all the advice I can offer at this point.
 

MrSoloDolo

Active Member
hey man i also use a 90w from lighthouse and gotham.i think they are great.i just harvested my NL and the smoke is prime.buds arnt huge but ok.i do have to say that you need to find a strain that performs well under leds.mango is by far the biggest budder under my 90w,followed by cyber crystal.i started a grow journal a while back but got lazy.i will update it with picks of my big nugs.honestly i was kinda skeptical about them too.sean their rep called me at home after my purchase to see if i was happy though.i liked that(and didnt)their youtube video explains it man.the new ones put out a great deal of lumens.but the uv models are superior to the other makes available.dont buy the 90 ho until the 3rd week of jan.then they will have a 120 degree angle available with the same coverage as the uv.thats what im waiting for sean will be calling me when they come in.i dont know man tey see to know what they are talking about.they also show facts to back up their product.only thing is that i can find 0 info on growboys magazine or lighthouse hydro.but if the ligt works who cares if they operate out of their garage lol.and i am getting good results.like their add says not quite a 400w hps.but around a 300w.the buds shine with crystals too.i think because of the uv light it stresses the plant into more thc production.ive done a lot of research on leds recently and i do like lighthouse...if i went with anyone else it would be htgsupply.com or groitled.com but they cost a lot more..atleast the lights have a label(the little lighthouse)that makes me feel better that they arnt just Chinese crap being re sold for a higher price..they also can get a 120 ho or uv.not sure what i will go with yet.i want two 90w or higher on my flowering plants.and my 50w for starting them/breeding in my tent.i am flowering a total of 7 full grown and 20 babys right now under the 90w and 50w on the babies a bit lower down,and they all are fucking ridiculous.and i switched from a 400w hps to the 90w uv.also keep in mind finding the right strain,the mango you cant go wrong. the cyber crystal isnt very potent but the bud is like 7 or 8 inches long,but if your just vegging you will be 100% satisfied with a 90w or higher.my 50w is good but the coverage is a little shy of the 90 so i wouldnt go that low if you have the choice(i got my 50w ufo for christmas from my fiance its good but if i bought it, it would have been a higher watt model.but shes a girl and doesnt know shit about growing just that i like the ufos lol.ill post pics..check my grow journal. 90w ufo closet i think is what i called it.its under indoorsavant:joint:
I also tried to research Gotham City Hydroponics and I am coming up with nothing. That Growboys award also doesn't seem legit- growboys.com shows the light as the winner, but when you click on any other subject, it says there is no info available- there aren't even any other lights listed in the 'competition'- just the Gotham City light.
Also, when I go to growboys.nl, that's supposed to be the 'magazine' website- it's just a picture of what looks like a magazine cover but that's the extent of the website... you can't click through to anything else...
So, that makes me think that Gotham City is shady. I know that a couple peeps on here have their lights and they seem to be working- but I am wondering why all the shadiness??

Or, maybe I am wrong and they aren't shady?
IDK- it just seems weird that they are saying they are the 'Growboys 2009 Best LED light winner' but it doesn't look like a legit competition- it seems like they made it up to seem more credible.

Anyone have any thoughts?
I just don't want to get ripped off!!
 
i've come up with the same results, and am also trying to decide between the 09, 10. the company does seem a lil shady, i mean who doesnt have a legit website these days. regardless of the company my main concern is quality of the buds and yeild. has any one harvested a crop on here with lighthouse led?
 

Saint Cannabis

Active Member
Like Thiaboy said lumen is not a proper way to measure the usefulness of a particular light for plant growth. Lumen is a subjective measurement of how bright a light "appears to the eye". Lumen is automatically biased toward the middle (green) portion of the light spectrum. For example, a green led would have more than twice the lumen count of a 660nm red led of the same photo-radiation yet the 660 led would produce much more PAR (green has almost none). A blue would have even less lumen for the same amount of emissivity and this is why if you search for "deep blue" or UV leds, many times you will see them rated in milliwatts of radiation rather than lumens like all the other colors. It is also why UV leds have warning that even though they may seem very dim (less than one lumen rating) they still can cause damage to the eye. The power is there but the human eye cannot optically perceive it.
Now a proper way to measure a light source's usefulness for growing plants would be its PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) rating. Although this generally does not quantify the differences between the red and blue sides of the spectrum, PAR is orders of magnitude more useful to the grower than Lumen. Why don't manufacturers use PAR in their ratings rather than Lumen? I suspect mostly out of ignorance. Most lights such as HID are not designed for plant growth, but for visibility. They have only been marketed and to some degree adapted to plant-growth markets as more people began to use them for such purposes. Also if manufacturer were to start listing the PAR ratings on HID lamps (or any commonly used light source for that matter), they would suddenly seem much less efficient. The HPS may put out the most lumen per watt of electricity used but most of those lumen are in the green and yellow parts of the spectrum of which plants need very little. This is why most plants appear green. They are reflecting most of the green light away.
With all this being said it should be clear why a PROPERLY designed LED lamp is ideal. One can select and balance only the parts of the spectrum needed in their individual volumes needed and not waste energy on the parts that the plant will simply not use. This also why the '6-band' version of the 90W lighthouse hydro lamp is so attractive to those who have done their research. The only thing is that when i read the propaganda from Gotham Products on there ebay listing, their information is very assumptive and in some places misplaced.
The first statement that really bothered me is
"After our analysis, we concluded that the reason for the win was the use of a mixture of 625nm UV/Blue LED's rather than the traditional blue 660nm LED's used in all other LED systems tested."
625nm and 660nm are RED wavelengths. UV/blue would be 380-430nm, and blue 430-480nm roughly. I know uv goes much lower but digress. Perhaps this is just a typo, but it is more than a simple typo. Next is
"Then there is the high output whites made by Cree. These lights put out 5 times the lumens of the a blue LED yet the peak frequency is 440nm! What we have is more lumens not only in the blue but in all spectrums."
Of course the lumen rating of a white led is going to be much higher than that of any blue led because the white contains much light in the middle part of spectrum (see above). Just because the white LED has an emissive peak at 440nm (which is good for other reasons) does not necessarily mean that you can infer the lumen rating on that part of the lamps spectrum.
The last that really bugs me is that the title claims UV and IR. Nowhere in the information do they list a wavelength that is Infra-red. 660nm is not close to being Infra-red. Perhaps the white leds produce a small amount of light approaching 700nm but this is not stated. I'm sure this is one of the best LED lights for veg growth but if i'm gonna put that much money into a light system its might as well produce the appropriate amount of 'flower-power'. Flowering plants need a certain amount of far-red/near-IR to get the signal to switch for flower production. This Q/A addresses this perfectly. http://www.cannabisculture.com/v2/articles/4576.html
To wrap this up the light from gotham_products seems to be one of the best LED systems i've seen yet, but as others have said... the proprietors seem rather shady. I have to question whether one will recieve what is promised... i sure hope so. If anyone has one already or is gonna take the "risk", be sure to let us know how it works out! To be honest, if i could spare the money right now i would try it myself.
 

hillbilly345

Active Member
I got the 09 about 3 weeks ago and Im impressed with it. I was thinking of getting the 10 but think I might be better off with the 09, Im gonna run 2 with CFLs for sidelight. pics , everything around 2 to 3 weeks with ffof no butes yet , Im gonna sex and then outdoor gorilla and indoor skog. Look at nubbie sec for first grow led/ cfl
 

mookie brown

Active Member
I have the 2010 & have been playing with it now for a few weeks. I'm an experienced soil grower who uses a 150watt hps for vegging & a 400watt hps for flowering. After my last harvest I started thinking about getting a ufo & at the very least I'll have a product which can veg & use less watts so all would not be a total loss.

I took a clipping off a ak48 mother plant a cloned it. I had that clone under a 85watt cfl until she rooted & then I transplanted to a 1 gallon hempy bucket. I figured since I'm going to experiment with the ufo when it arrives I might as well learn hempy bucket technique. When the ufo arrived I hooked it up in a spare mother grow tent with the clone. Shes responding well to the light. At 8" is when I induced flowering by switching to 12/12. I'm just over a week into the stretch. I'm also using BMO's grow it green for vegging & will use it for the first 2 weeks of flowering (the stretch). In 1 week when stretch is over, that is when I'll start using the BMO flower power. I'm going to use this 2010 ufo all the way through flowering this clone. Any questions just ask & hopefully I can answer.







:peace:
 

mookie brown

Active Member
I counted the diodes to see how many of each type make up the 2010 90watt ufo.

20reds, 8 deep reds, 50 ho warm white, 10 blue whites, 1 uv & 1 infrared.

If I understand correctly aren't the warm whites for flowering just as it would be with cfl's ?

I'm starting to think this model is not just for vegging. Why would a company release a model which would be for vegging & it costs more than their traditional red & blue ufo ?

I personally believe that gotham is sitting on a large stock of their 2009 model & want to move them out the door before they get stuck with them or let them go for cheap & take a loss because buyers are purchasing their 2010 models & not the 2009. If you check out their ebay items for sale, they have auction listings, buy it nows & make best offers for the 2009 model yet no auction listings for the 2010, just buy it now & make best offer for the 2010 model. They must not be in a hurry to push them out the door until the 2009s are gone. Who knows, time will tell & definitely I'll have my answer with my experiment
 
Top