| Forum | Shop | Market | ![]() |
Seeds | FAQ | Tools |
SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS |
Looking for Legal Marijuana look no further! |
|||||
|
#1
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Edit*
which set up would be able to be used most efficiently, any thoughts would be welcome. From my experience sog's seem to yeild the best (not including vertical gardens) Im leaning towards the ten, 400 watters, just because I figure you could cover more area with a sog. thanks guys peace in Also Im a bit confused as to how multiple lights contribute, I looked through the threads here and seemed to find conflicting info. on another site I found this "Originally Posted by Dewave (3) 400 watt lights do NOT equal 1200 watts of growing power, it is simply 400 watts from different angles and you get more lighter buds. Or say 40,000 lumens from different angles. The same with (2) 600 watt lights, it does NOT equal 1200 watts, At 90,000 lumens it is still 2 sources of light at 2 different angles. And fatter buds Now a 1000 watt light at 140,000 lumens gets the fattest buds. So adding more lights will get more coverage but not necessarily more penetration or more bud weight like a 1000 watt does. Total lumen output from a single source is what you are looking for. Two sources of lumen output equals just that, 2 sources from different angles, they are no stronger but yet come from different angles. I have seen penetration described as LUX, as opposed to the more common description of light quanity, LUMENS. the coverage area of each bulb, is best described as a radius from the bulb, 1000w gives 53 inch radius, 600w gives a 33 inch radius and 400w gives a 22 inch radius. that pretty much describes the penetration as well. anything beyond the radius wont get enough light to develop fully. A light mover can expand the coverage area on the same plane it moves on, ie horizontal, vertical, circular. Adding another light, if in the same plane wont increase the penetration, but can spread the area horizontally. If you can place another light lower in the canopy, or from below you can increase the vertical area. If you place a light mover below, moving horizontally, you can increase both vertical and horizontal coverage. If you could make a circular light mover, you could maximize your coverage area." Then I found this as well.. Quote:
Much love & many thanks Last edited by MediMary; 05-27-2009 at 05:56 PM.. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
6 600 watts would be a lot better than 4 x 1000 i think
__________________
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our mind
|
|
#5
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Howzit DownOnWax..
yea totally serious question..My first system was a 1000 sun system, and since then I have never used anything smaller than a 1000k, I dont have any experience with smaller bulbs other than seeing other peoples grows on here.. The reason I orignally got the 1000k was I wanted to grow big plants, I started growing big plants, but Have found I do much better with smaller plants in a Sog type setup.. |
|
#8
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Iheard that for the price of killawat hours and electricity to lumens ratio 600 watt ballasts are the better value.who cares how much cheaper the balasts them selves are .Using 600watt ballasts will save hundreds of dollars a month.another cost efective venture is light movers .with light tracks you would need half the bulbs to light the same area with half the labor of turning 200or300 plants
|
|
#9
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
light movers are good, although I wouldnt say you can light twice the area, plus it takes, id say another week or more to reach full maturity when using movers, plus with air cooled lights running its sorta a pain to use light movers... id say the increase yield is about 15-20 percent(which def is great)IMHO
Although I read where FDD said light movers are deceiving because when you take light from one area of the garden, the other part of the garden is without it.. thats off subject anyways .. thanks for the input though = ) Last edited by MediMary; 05-27-2009 at 07:01 PM.. |
|
#10
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Well maybe I can still change your mind.I also have had the problem of slow growth because of the light being so far away .so I used liquid light.Im not saying that it does everything that their selling.but I grew a 36plant grow under a1000wat hortilux eye and a 6foot light mover.the growth was the same as without the mover when I used the liquid light.
|
| Tags |
| 1000watters, 400watt, hps, ten |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| SOG Grow Room Op | SOG | Grow Journals | 121 | 11-29-2009 11:17 PM |
| HPS 250 whipping my 26 wattx8 6500k cfl's | Guitarantula | General Marijuana Growing | 16 | 04-17-2009 02:36 PM |
| Height of NL grown 12/12 under 400watt hps? | REFRIGINATOR | Indoor Growing | 0 | 04-01-2009 01:01 AM |
| new to these hows my set up sound ? | sequento | Newbie Central | 14 | 03-30-2009 03:10 PM |
| what are other uses of 400watt hps | xtrmhkr | Newbie Central | 1 | 06-21-2007 12:43 PM |
Come Check out a new Poker Forum for the online poker community