quick drying - the other side of the coin. - Page 3

Al B. Fuct · #21 03-31-2007, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silk

It think you can take Al B. Fuct 's comments with a grain of salt. I take all the advice on this topic with salt. The right way to dry and cure bud is to your liking.

The difference being that I've personally tried the contended methods, while some critics are happy to cite anyone's else often seriously dodgy information rather than seeking evidence independently.

Quote:

Originally Posted by silk

I believe for some like Al B. Fuct and myself, there will always come a time in our growth as students that we will question the teacher. This in my opinion is the best a teacher can expect.

And fair enough; but students must first develop a competent critical analysis framework before setting forth on independent study, if the analysis is to have any merit. In simpler terms, a bullshit filter. Some folks don't have one of those in full working order just yet.

If grow-books were peer-reviewed, where all results are replicatable independently by others, it would be reasonable to take what they say verbatim. However, I'm not sure any such thing exists. The result is a bunch of grow authors who tell the same wrong tales over and over- for pay.

No one on rollitup is paying me for my opinions. The real proof of any information is in independent replicatability. I make sure that anything I suggest on here is absolutely replicatable by anyone who tries it- or I don't waste time writing it up. When someone else successfully tests one of my theories, this is as close to a peer-review as you'll ever get in this line of work.

This is why I invite critics to try something before attempting to discredit it- and especially when trying to do so with rather suspect information, even if there is a great preponderance of it. I'm not suggesting that one typo invalidates an entire grow book, but if something like wet buds in a sealed jar gets past the author, you really do have to wonder about the rest of the content...

cali-high · #22 03-31-2007, 04:31 PM

this is alot of info. good job every1

TheConstantGardner · #23 03-31-2007, 04:51 PM

I sautee my buds in oil and garlic then duct tape them to the exhaust pipe of my '74 Gremlin and drive around the block a few times. mmmm, mmmm, mmmm, tastey!

Al B. Fuct · #24 03-31-2007, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheConstantGardner

I sautee my buds in oil and garlic then duct tape them to the exhaust pipe of my '74 Gremlin and drive around the block a few times. mmmm, mmmm, mmmm, tastey!

*hahahahahahah*

fdd2blk · #25 03-31-2007, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al B. Fuct

The difference being that I've personally tried the contended methods, while some critics are happy to cite anyone's else often seriously dodgy information rather than seeking evidence independently.

And fair enough; but students must first develop a competent critical analysis framework before setting forth on independent study, if the analysis is to have any merit. In simpler terms, a bullshit filter. Some folks don't have one of those in full working order just yet.

If grow-books were peer-reviewed, where all results are replicatable independently by others, it would be reasonable to take what they say verbatim. However, I'm not sure any such thing exists. The result is a bunch of grow authors who tell the same wrong tales over and over- for pay.

No one on rollitup is paying me for my opinions. The real proof of any information is in independent replicatability. I make sure that anything I suggest on here is absolutely replicatable by anyone who tries it- or I don't waste time writing it up. When someone else successfully tests one of my theories, this is as close to a peer-review as you'll ever get in this line of work.

This is why I invite critics to try something before attempting to discredit it- and especially when trying to do so with rather suspect information, even if there is a great preponderance of it. I'm not suggesting that one typo invalidates an entire grow book, but if something like wet buds in a sealed jar gets past the author, you really do have to wonder about the rest of the content...

i guess he missed the 20 years experience and i've tried them all part. anyone who doesn't know you can use a clone for a mother has a lot of learning to do.

i have a BIG jar of salt. love the stuff. now that i've been ignored, NEXT !!

fdd2blk · #26 03-31-2007, 05:52 PM

so to sum it all up, it is the descion of the grower to educate herself/himself on what he/she believes to be the proper method. not once did i state any personal opinion on this thread. like i said from the start this is just information i have to share. grow on my friends, grow on.

fdd2blk · #27 03-31-2007, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheConstantGardner

I sautee my buds in oil and garlic then duct tape them to the exhaust pipe of my '74 Gremlin and drive around the block a few times. mmmm, mmmm, mmmm, tastey!

i'm riding my bike behind you.

fdd2blk · #28 03-31-2007, 06:08 PM

time for the jar.
IM000869.jpg

:h ump:

: peace:

eace:

silk · #29 04-01-2007, 01:42 AM

nice jars

!

fdd2blk · #30 04-04-2007, 05:05 PM

not to beat a dead horse, but........ i was re-reading fuckeds original dry box thread and first he says my method is fine if my humidity is low. then i give him +rep for an idea of his, then he ignores me. ???????
Bud dryer - manicured to smoke in 3 days

silly rabbit.