Tons'a Guns

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Just recently, in Early Texas, armed citizen Vic Stacy shot and stopped a deranged man who had just murdered two neighbors and was firing at police with a rifle. Stacy made a very long shot with his revolver, three times as far as the perpetrator was from the police officer, who had an AR-15 type rifle.



There are several documented cases where armed citizens have stopped mass attacks by gunmen. Let me list a few: The Pearl, Mississippi school shooting was stopped by the vice principal Joel Myrick with a Colt .45, The Appalachian School shooting was stopped by two students with handguns. Both of the above incidents were stopped by the armed citizens threatening the shooter without firing.


The mass church shooting in Colorado Springs was stopped by the shooter being shot by a church member with a CCW permit.
 

ProfessorPotSnob

New Member
Fer Fucks sake , who let you out of that Mexican Insane Asylum ?
[video=youtube;-ivC7GFhe4o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ivC7GFhe4o[/video]
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
It's like in Pulp Fiction, when Samuel L Jackson pulled the gun on the robbers in the resteraunt.
 

radrolley

Well-Known Member
my dream is to open a dispensary called guns and ganj. seriously. its what everyone is into where i live. rednecks that like to get go to camp, get drunk, smoke pot, ride 4 wheelers, and shoot guns. it's like canada with better gun laws. it's safer than most people think. like to see a thief rob that dispensary.

couple of my friends have both CPLs and medical cards. some guy won a case in court against the ATF that had both last year.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
LEO possess ar-15 rifles, but actually fire them only a few times, even at the range. In fact, they are limited to the number of rounds they can fire at the range, usually under 20.

When I go, I fire off 50 rounds at least. (Of .223 or .308) Then pull out my .40 and rattle off 100 rounds, then 100 rounds or so of .22

LEO, in general, are a bad shot.

Stacey with the revolver was probably shooting a .25 -- a fairly common round, and revolvers tend to be pretty accurate. Those and 1911's.
 

blacksun

New Member
my dream is to open a dispensary called guns and ganj. seriously. its what everyone is into where i live. rednecks that like to get go to camp, get drunk, smoke pot, ride 4 wheelers, and shoot guns. it's like canada with better gun laws. it's safer than most people think. like to see a thief rob that dispensary.

couple of my friends have both CPLs and medical cards. some guy won a case in court against the ATF that had both last year.


It's not the thieves you have to worry about, it's the feds.

Hopefully bubba doesn't shoot one of them, especially while in a dispensary, or he's fucked for life.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
LEO possess ar-15 rifles, but actually fire them only a few times, even at the range. In fact, they are limited to the number of rounds they can fire at the range, usually under 20.

When I go, I fire off 50 rounds at least. (Of .223 or .308) Then pull out my .40 and rattle off 100 rounds, then 100 rounds or so of .22

LEO, in general, are a bad shot.

Stacey with the revolver was probably shooting a .25 -- a fairly common round, and revolvers tend to be pretty accurate. Those and 1911's.
But multiple cops with a long barrel gun should have been able to hit someone that was engaging them, at least before someone with a pistol was able to iron sight snipe the guy. I was watching gangland once, and the police were out maneuvered by 2 gunmen, simply because one had been trained by the military. So with his strategic training he and the other guy won by taking cover, using cover fire, and getting closer and closer to the cops, which made them more frantic. And I would assume that even riot police or swat are trained in traditional roman type battle, full frontal volley, with some range weapons hidden or in the back. So all people need to learn is ambush tactics, and regrouping. If occupy had planned to run, split into two or three groups, then meet at a bank to protest, they wouldn't have been eradicated.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
On February 12, 2007, a lone gunman, Sulejman Talovic opened fire at the crowded Trolley Square shopping mall killing five bystanders. Armed with a shotgun with a pistol grip, a 38-caliber handgun with rubber grips, and a backpack full of ammunition, he set forth on his rampage through the Mall.
But he did not get as far as he had hoped. He was stopped when off-duty police officer Kenneth Hammond of the Ogden City Police Department who was at Trolley Square having an early Valentine’s Day dinner with his pregnant wife. When they heard shots, she called 911 and he drew his weapon and confronted Talovic. He was joined by Sgt. Andrew Oblad of the Salt Lake City Police Department. They pinned down Talovic, stopping further deaths, until a SWAT team from the Salt Lake City Police Department killed him.
Hammond, a man with a weapon, was credited with saving “countless lives.”
In Aurora, Colorado, there were no armed bystanders and Holmes was unimpeded in his deadly rampage. Gun control advocates use the grizzly story of the Aurora movie theater to push their cause. But common sense tells us that it is easier to put guns into the hands of law-abiding citizens and to instruct them in their use than to keep them away from the insane or evil people who perpetrate these shootings.
If the movie-goers in Aurora had one or two armed and trained men or women, the shooting would have gone the way of the Trolley Square massacre, not the bloodier outcome in Aurora.
 

Perfextionist420

Well-Known Member
Why do you even post on my threads, there IS a subscribe button, you don't HAVE to post.
you want to know the sad truth finshaggy, I actually agree with you on this one. I'm for the right to bear arms by non violent citizens, and the truth behind this thread is if anyone else posted it they would get a lot more support but unfortunately you have made yourself pretty unlikeable here with the majority of the other nonsense you spew
 

Rawrb

Well-Known Member
But multiple cops with a long barrel gun should have been able to hit someone that was engaging them, at least before someone with a pistol was able to iron sight snipe the guy. I was watching gangland once, and the police were out maneuvered by 2 gunmen, simply because one had been trained by the military. So with his strategic training he and the other guy won by taking cover, using cover fire, and getting closer and closer to the cops, which made them more frantic. And I would assume that even riot police or swat are trained in traditional roman type battle, full frontal volley, with some range weapons hidden or in the back. So all people need to learn is ambush tactics, and regrouping. If occupy had planned to run, split into two or three groups, then meet at a bank to protest, they wouldn't have been eradicated.
Sorry Finshaggy, didn't realize you Attila the Hun, Julius Caesar and Napoleon all rolled into one couch-surfing military genius...
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
But multiple cops with a long barrel gun should have been able to hit someone that was engaging them, at least before someone with a pistol was able to iron sight snipe the guy. I was watching gangland once, and the police were out maneuvered by 2 gunmen, simply because one had been trained by the military. So with his strategic training he and the other guy won by taking cover, using cover fire, and getting closer and closer to the cops, which made them more frantic. And I would assume that even riot police or swat are trained in traditional roman type battle, full frontal volley, with some range weapons hidden or in the back. So all people need to learn is ambush tactics, and regrouping. If occupy had planned to run, split into two or three groups, then meet at a bank to protest, they wouldn't have been eradicated.
Here you go shaggy, free instructional course for you, no bitcoins required:http://www.marines.com/home
 

see4

Well-Known Member
But multiple cops with a long barrel gun should have been able to hit someone that was engaging them, at least before someone with a pistol was able to iron sight snipe the guy. I was watching gangland once, and the police were out maneuvered by 2 gunmen, simply because one had been trained by the military. So with his strategic training he and the other guy won by taking cover, using cover fire, and getting closer and closer to the cops, which made them more frantic. And I would assume that even riot police or swat are trained in traditional roman type battle, full frontal volley, with some range weapons hidden or in the back. So all people need to learn is ambush tactics, and regrouping. If occupy had planned to run, split into two or three groups, then meet at a bank to protest, they wouldn't have been eradicated.
Based on this comment, I know with certainty you have never shot a gun. Ever.

I bet a plinker would kick back in your face, limp wrist.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Based on this comment, I know with certainty you have never shot a gun. Ever.

I bet a plinker would kick back in your face, limp wrist.
don't worry I think shaggy's going into the Marine Corps.........I hope.....
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
Here you go shaggy, free instructional course for you, no bitcoins required:http://www.marines.com/home
don't worry I think shaggy's going into the Marine Corps.........I hope.....
No, just no! Our finspermie anything but the elite of the elite I think not. Sorry he underestimated you Fin you want to go here..... you know one shot one kill, hardest day was someone else's issue, everyman for himself blah blah

http://www.navyseals.com/files/ChallengeSEAL.pdf
 
Top