Man made carbon emission causes AGW?

I think man made carbon emission is causing anthropogenic global warming.


  • Total voters
    14

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member
Notice he cannot name them. How come no one arguing against me can actually support their arguments? Instead they make bullshit allegations that they cannot back up.
As I was told earlier, we're in the dirty little corner of RIU, Politics. I'm unpleasantly amazed here because the the tolerant, liberal, peaceful stoners seem to have a grand time tearing up posters and opinions that differ from there own. I appreciate your input on this thread, thanks.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
As I was told earlier, we're in the dirty little corner of RIU, Politics. I'm unpleasantly amazed here because the the tolerant, liberal, peaceful stoners seem to have a grand time tearing up posters and opinions that differ from there own. I appreciate your input on this thread, thanks.
you do know that poptech authored this page?

http://www.populartechnology.net/2008/12/anti-marijuana-resource.html

have you seen the standards that he kept to while compiling that list?

your more than happy for an anti marijuana campaigner to stay on a marijuana site because he agrees with you on something?

next you'd be welcoming the DEA with open arms
 

poptech

Member
It is fascinating that you cannot debate me on any facts relating to climate change but instead have to desperately introduce red herrings.
 

ArcticGranite

Well-Known Member

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
The 100 year trend is that the earth has warmed 0.74 degrees. Source, IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_.../en/spms1.html

Graph plotted temperature change of global land ocean temperatures 1880-2010. Source, GISS NASA http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ta...LB.Ts+dSST.txt





Let's stay on point and discuss what the issue is.
A big part of the issue is thermal inertia. Y'know how they start a bobsled? Four big guys grunt, scream, push. In the first seconds they're not going fast at all but still loading the system with energy. That chart shows small realized gains, but occludes the probable "thermal momentum" that'll add two degrees to the final peak. And the sledders are running harder and harder each year, adding more thermal momentum. Removing the irritant won't reverse the warming trend on a dime. That is a big, big part of the issue: in a reverse of the usual metaphor, we're only seeing the tip of the hotberg. cn
 

poptech

Member
your the person who invited him here and your perfectly happy
Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width, Testing post width

vBulletin and WYSIWYG editors suck.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It is fascinating that you cannot debate me on any facts relating to climate change but instead have to desperately introduce red herrings.
i'll scream it from the mountaintops: beliefs do not exist in a vacuum, they exist in human minds.

if you're the type of dullard who thinks that there is some magical property of cannabis that causes people to want to snort heroine, you've just disqualified yourself from any further scientific debate whatsoever.*

such nonsense disqualifies you from understanding science.
 
Top