Mind Bender For You High Thinkers

[oneyearorange]

They surrender!

 

[tckfui]

so than the unstoppable force is in fact stopable?

 

[oneyearorange]

Theese two things can not exist in the same universe. If you have an unstopable force that means it can move any object. If you have an immovable then no force no matter how unstopable it is will move it. So the answer is neither can exist together in the same dimension. So the question in itself is wrong, because these two things cannot exist at the same time.

 

[LiveHigh]

I have the answer and it is very simple.

Whose to say the unstoppable force has to stop when it reaches an immovable object? It will just roll straight over the object like a speed bump. Never stopping and never moving the immovable object.

 

[oneyearorange]

Well then you would have to look at the word meet. In this case does meet mean that they touch?

 

[stinkincatfish]

ricochet....

 

[tckfui]

I think ricochet or just stopping is most liklly
its called hypotheitical

 

[oneyearorange]

theese two things can not exist at the same time thats my answer.

Maybe the real answer is there is no answer.

So there's no answer. Thats the answer.

 

[tckfui]

hypothetical questions are hardly ever possible

 

[Reprogrammed]

The unstoppable object would simply pass through the atomic structure of the immovable object.

 

[tckfui]

hmmmm could be!!! like flash!!! he can run so fast he got his atoms moving so fast he could walk through walls... yea... I read a few flash commics in my day

 

[rkm]

As physics suggests, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

In this case not sure what the reaction would be. Would they go through each other?

Wouldn't gravity be an unstoppable force?

 

[tckfui]

didnt we have a thread a week or so ago coming to the conclusing that gravity isnt a force ?
what happens if you jump through a ring of fire, while asmoking hash, but its a thursday, and your in afganistan with ET?

 

[natmoon]

What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?

The question is false as neither exist

 

[Taipan]

it goes through it, something can go through an object with out it moving, ozmosis

 

[WhatAmIDoing]

What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?

Both are created only in our minds because of the connotations and denotations of the words "Unstoppable" and "Immovable". There is no such thing as either. Perhaps view from another perspective, minus the two adjectives. As grammar and language were simply creations to describe feelings, ideas, and emotions, these two words are used for ideas. Thus, applying idealogical elements to a realistic environment results in "impossibility".


..I suppose. Now I'll go read what everyone wrote..

 

[WhatAmIDoing]

Some people have said some thought inducing things. Others have simply rambled senselessly. I geuss both are just what happens.

Lol to the explosion theory.

Okay to the "impossible" theory.

Personally, I view this as an unnecessary conflict of ideas inthought. As this situation has no implication upon my life, no effect rather, It is irrellevant. Perhaps osmosis is possible. Perhaps the atoms thingy--that is, if you want to need an answer. "Unstoppable" and "Immovable" exist in relation to a certain time-view, but in reality are non-existent as viewing time in a different manner reveals a different perpsective on what is good/bad/etc. If you need an example of this, use history. We study it, we scrutinize and say "this was good, this was bad, this was dumb, this was unavoidable", etc. But what about now? Do you say that about the things you are doing at this moment? What? Oh no, you can't. Because you're doing them. Perhaps you can view time in an accelerated fashion to analyze quickly after acting/thinking. Yet they still are seperate. Time's a fun topic... (only, I believe, because it isn't understood in its entirety)

~~Anything seems easy/possible, DUH! when you understand it.

 

[natmoon]

The question is still false as i had said before

 

[WhatAmIDoing]

The question is still false as i had said before

That's a simplification that may not be understood by some without further explanation.


...but basically

 

[natmoon]

Lol.
Its ok.

If you wish to try to answer a question that cannot be answered because its completely hypocritical of itself in the first place then be my guest

If you wish to answer the comic book hero style question in a comic book hero way you should have just said that it would invoke the physical laws of our space time continuum and that they would cancel each other out