InB4 the Eco-Loons

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Just out of curiosity, how could there be a hiatus if 14 of the 15 hottest years on record occurred in this century?
I don't know. Why don't you ask the LONG list of scientists and established leaders on your side of the argument, why they have made so many explanations to explain a hiatus that doesn't exist?

Google "warming hiatus explanations" and you can see the LONG list of proMMGW experts spending a great deal of energy, time and money to explain the "ghost hiatus".

Chucklhead science denier
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
I don't see a proper peer reviewed study which shows that such a vast body of research gathered from ice cores and geological survey ought to be abandoned in favor of your assertion that there only exists data from the last 135 years regarding climate and greenhouse gas levels.
Take it up with NASA and the NOAA, they made the claim of 135 years. I just put it into perspective.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I don't know. Why don't you ask the LONG list of scientists and established leaders on your side of the argument, why they have made so many explanations to explain a hiatus that doesn't exist?

Google "warming hiatus explanations" and you can see the LONG list of proMMGW experts spending a great deal of energy, time and money to explain the "ghost hiatus".

Chucklhead science denier
Wow

So scientists who spend their lives to discover scientific truths and measurable facts, are vigorous in their attempts to rebut misinformers, therefore I am a science denier for agreeing with them, because they spend so much time and energy defending their research. That is a beautiful piece of fallacy. Truly artistic and awe inspiring. I have never witnessed such stupidity.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You want a link to the NASA website? Fuck, I'll break my rule just for you.

NASA.gov

There ya go Skippy. It's the GIANT first article on their homepage. I think you can take it from there.
It doesn't say that data regarding temperatures and CO2 levels before 135 years ago should be disregarded.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Wow

So scientists who spend their lives to discover scientific truths and measurable facts, are vigorous in their attempts to rebut misinformers, therefore I am a science denier for agreeing with them, because they spend so much time and energy defending their research. That is a beautiful piece of fallacy. Truly artistic and awe inspiring. I have never witnessed such stupidity.
Actually, they weren't defending their work. They are SPECIFICALLY giving explanations for the hiatus. You know, that hiatus you claim didn't happen.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
But 14 of the 15 hottest years on record were in this century and 2014 was the hottest. That kinds of inplyes dat der planit are being hawter.
Weird that leaders of your movement would contradict such an obvious truth by going on record with explanations for a hiatus that didn't happen. Didn't they get the memo?
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
And who did?

Try typing "CO2 diffusion in Polar Ice" in google.

Or start here for a decent summary (warning, it's longer than a post from me and Kynes combined, but there's no math, just plenty of scientific critique and some graphics):

http://robertkernodle.hubpages.com/hub/ICE-Core-CO2-Records-Ancient-Atmospheres-Or-Geophysical-Artifacts

That should give you some reasons as to why data from ice cores are dubious, hence anything beyond 1880 (never mind 1979) is wonky speculation, at least until the issues are properly factored in, which I can't imagine will happen any time soon (if ever).
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
one last time here

There is no hiatus, earth has continued getting hotter as evidenced by 14 of the 15 hottest years on record being in this century and 2014 being the hottest. There can't be a hiatus in global warming, if the earth has continued warming all along.

When scientists refute and debunk the hiatus notion, that is not explaining it as though it were a real thing, that is explaining why it looks like a hiatus to a imbecile like you. Now move on to your next argument which has already been debunked, that the predictions don't match the observation.

I'll go even slower.

THE
SCIENTISTS
AND
EXPERTS
THAT
YOU
ELEVATE
AS
LEADERS
OF
YOUR
AGENDA,
ARE
DIRECTLY
CONTRADICTING
YOUR
ASSERTION.
Now, the agenda is science and discovery through empirical research. That is why scientists and experts are elevated.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
When scientists refute and debunk the hiatus notion, that is not explaining it as though it were a real thing, that is explaining why it looks like a hiatus to a imbecile like you. Now move on to your next argument which has already been debunked, that the predictions don't match the observation.
Sorry, you fail again.

The scientists didn't refute or debunk the hiatus, THEY EXPLAINED WHAT CAUSED IT. Let me be clear, since you didn't actually go read the long list of your heroes THAT ARE ON RECORD, contradicting your claim.

THEY
ACKNOWLEDGE
THE
HIATUS
AND
OFFER
EXPLANATIONS
FOR
ITS
EXISTENCE.

I know it will shatter your fantasy world, but using Google is easy. Try "warming hiatus explanations" and you will see a cavalcade of YOUR experts ACKNOWLEDGING and offering explanations for a hiatus that you claim didn't happen.

You hate science, don't you?
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
All he needs to do is keep repeating there is no hiatus and click his liberal shoes together 3 times and he will be home in fantasy land....
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The scientists didn't refute or debunk the hiatus, THEY EXPLAINED WHAT CAUSED IT.
14 of the 15 hottest years on record were in this century and 2014 was the hottest of all.

THEREFORE
IT
HAS
CONTINUED
GETTING
HOTTER
THEREFORE
THERE
IS
NO
FUCKING
HIATUS
IN
GLOBAL
WARMING
YOU
FUCK
TARD

is fucktard one word?
 
Top