Random Jibber Jabber Thread

april

Pickle Queen
you don't care much for sunni it seems.
:eyesmoke:
Just dissapointed she allowed someone else to win...she lost when she got defensive and quit over lord knows what..details are missing..overtime Is always a good thing...if she spoke to her boss the same way as she speaks to members on here i understand what happened.
 

mysunnyboy

Well-Known Member
Just dissapointed she allowed someone else to win...she lost when she got defensive and quit over lord knows what..details are missing..overtime Is always a good thing...if she spoke to her boss the same way as she speaks to members on here i understand what happened.
okee dokee thanks for clearing it up for me :eyesmoke:
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
i really reeeeally want new ink, i have the design and everything, just waiting for the right time :eyesmoke:
Me too. I have the money (thanks to my honey who birthday'd it to me) but not quite the design.... Or the morphine (it is a cultural tradition). I need to get to the library for design help. The morphine'll either happen or not. I'm not looking.
 

dr.gonzo1

Well-Known Member
Cool, as long as you're ok Sunni. I hate confrontations. Did you think of lots of great things to say like 20mins later?
 

ClaytonBigsby

Well-Known Member
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_work_environment

A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP]
A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or reported regulatory violations by management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Employers have tried to force employees to quit by imposing unwarranted discipline, reducing hours, cutting wages, or transferring the complaining employee to a distant work location. The employer and the employee often mistakenly believe that if the employee quits his or her job due to the hostile work environment, the employee cannot get unemployment benefits and cannot sue the employer.
In many states within the USA, this is true; but in others neither is true. [SUP][3][/SUP]
The United States Supreme Court stated in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services,[SUP][4][/SUP] that Title VII is "not a general civility code." Thus, federal law within the USA does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.







 

dr.gonzo1

Well-Known Member
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile_work_environment

A hostile work environment exists when an employee experiences workplace harassment and fears going to work because of the offensive, intimidating, or oppressive atmosphere generated by the harasser.[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP]
A hostile work environment may also be created when management acts in a manner designed to make an employee quit in retaliation for some action. For example, if an employee reported safety violations at work, was injured, attempted to join a union, or reported regulatory violations by management, then their response might be to harass and pressure the employee to quit. Employers have tried to force employees to quit by imposing unwarranted discipline, reducing hours, cutting wages, or transferring the complaining employee to a distant work location. The employer and the employee often mistakenly believe that if the employee quits his or her job due to the hostile work environment, the employee cannot get unemployment benefits and cannot sue the employer.
In many states within the USA, this is true; but in others neither is true. [SUP][3][/SUP]
The United States Supreme Court stated in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services,[SUP][4][/SUP] that Title VII is "not a general civility code." Thus, federal law within the USA does not prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not extremely serious. Rather, the conduct must be so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of the individual's employment. The conditions of employment are altered only if the harassment culminates in a tangible employment action or are sufficiently severe or pervasive.







Wow, easy man. You guys are so quick to litigate.

Just call it a misunderstanding and fight it out bare chest boxing style like our gals do here in the uk.
 

ClaytonBigsby

Well-Known Member
If that was an option, things would be much better here, but if she hit her boss, she would be arrested. Bosses would be much better if you could choke them over a "misunderstanding".
 
Top